Page 1 of 1

Charlie blew it

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 10:16 am
by j
Don't want to trick anyone...so read on if you think Teresa Heinze Kerry is fair game to rag on. :)

From: http://www.ralphbristol.com

Sorry Charlie. You blew it. ABC's Charles Gibson sat down with Teresa Heinz Kerry for an interview that played on Good Morning America today and failed to ask the only two questions that would have made the interview interesting for the audience and a great promo for ABC.



Just before the Gibson/Kerry interview, ABC aired a story about some other explosive Teresa quotes, these from the past and aimed at Senator Ted Kennedy and the Democratic Party. In a book published in 1975, when she was married to Republican Congressman John Heinz of Pennsylvania, the outspoken political wife said of Kennedy, "I know some couples who stay together only for politics. If Ted Kennedy holds on to that marriage just for the Catholic vote, as some people say he does, then I think he's a perfect bastard." Heinz said she "didn't trust" President Richard M. Nixon but added, "Ted Kennedy I don't trust either.'' She also said, "The Democratic machine in this country is putrid."



Charlie failed to ask Teresa about those comments at all, and he missed the only pertinent question regarding her "shove it" comment that she made just two days ago.



· Charlie: Mrs. Kerry, that I know of, I have never been told to shove it. Do you regret it?

· Teresa: No

· Charlie: Are we too polite in politics?



What!!! That's not the right question. The right question is, "Now that you have had a chance to review the tape and you know that you did in fact use the word 'un-American' to describe some of the 'political traits' in this country, would you now elaborate on what you meant, or do you want me to 'shove it' too?"



Having suffered that disappointment I eagerly awaited the Kennedy question, which also never came. The reason I monitored ABC was because Drudge told me that Charlie was going to ask the question. I thought he was getting to it during this exchange:



· Charlie: "You were married to a very prominent Republican at one point. Has your thinking changed significantly given the different circumstances you're in now?"

· Teresa: "No, not at all, not at all."



What an opening! I could almost hear Charlie jump in with, "Does that mean you still think Ted Kennedy is a 'perfect bastard' and that the Democratic machine is 'putrid?'" But, alas, the question never came. Instead, Charlie came back with, "What do you think of George W. Bush?" Huh?



Katie Couric of NBC also conducted an interview with Mrs. Kerry that aired this morning. To her credit, Katie did repeat Mrs. Kerry's quote that contained the phrase "un-American traits." Mrs. Kerry answered "And that's a lot different than un-American activities." That's not much of an answer, but at least Katie did ask her the question. I have no idea whether Katie was aware of the other story at the time she interviewed Mrs. Kerry.



I'm not actually sure if Charlie knew of the other story at the time he conducted his interview with Mrs. Kerry, but if not, he should have told us so, to excuse himself for missing such an obvious question. We know he was aware of it when he introduced his interview on Good Morning America.



Because of the question he did ask:

"You were married to a very prominent Republican at one point. Has your thinking changed significantly given the different circumstances you're in now?"
And Mrs. Kerry's answer.

"No, not at all, not at all."


We are left to assume that Teresa Heinz Kerry still believes that Ted Kennedy is a "perfect bastard" and the Democratic machine is "putrid." One would think Mrs. Kerry would like to clear that up.

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 10:49 am
by Lindaloo
Flip Flop. lol. She and Kerry are a perfect match.

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 10:59 am
by TexasStooge
Lindaloo wrote:Flip Flop. lol. She and Kerry are a perfect match.

LOL!!!!!!!!!! :lol:

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:34 am
by Guest
A quote from 30 years ago....Big Deal....I am sure Bush/Cheney do not want us dragging up quotes from the early and mid 70's

A non-starter and a clear act of GOP desperation IMO.

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 4:06 pm
by southerngale
Desperation? lol
Why is it "desperation" or "grasping" when Republicans bring up the past but it shows the real character of the person if Democrats bring it up?

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 4:10 pm
by Lindaloo
southerngale wrote:Desperation? lol
Why is it "desperation" or "grasping" when Republicans bring up the past but it shows the real character of the person if Democrats bring it up?


Don't you know that is the way it is when they have no argument?

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 4:14 pm
by Guest
Lindaloo wrote:
southerngale wrote:Desperation? lol
Why is it "desperation" or "grasping" when Republicans bring up the past but it shows the real character of the person if Democrats bring it up?


Don't you know that is the way it is when they have no argument?


I do have an argument, Lindaloo.

My argument is that it is a non-issue.

It is something said by someone 30 years ago and clearly irrelevant to the election.

Is that what you do when YOU have no argument, attack the arguer and not the argument??

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 4:18 pm
by Guest
southerngale wrote:Desperation? lol
Why is it "desperation" or "grasping" when Republicans bring up the past but it shows the real character of the person if Democrats bring it up?


Not always true....Not all of Democrats on this board buy the lefty talking points on every single issue, the way MOST of the Republicans on this board do of the right.

Bush told Al Hunt to go F$$K Himself in 1988 in front of his kids.

Do I care now?? No.

Does it show his character now that he did coke, got a Dui and evaded the draft?

no.

Non-issues.

people change.

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 5:00 pm
by Lindaloo
So Ted kennedy has changed? Um ooooookay and alrighty then.

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 5:02 pm
by Guest
Lindaloo wrote:So Ted kennedy has changed? Um ooooookay and alrighty then.


I believe that he has IMO.

But how you infer from my post that because people change that everybody has changed is beyond me. Terrible argument IMO.

By your logic, if people do not change then I guess you think W is still a coke using alcoholic.

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 5:17 pm
by Lindaloo
zwyts wrote:
Lindaloo wrote:So Ted kennedy has changed? Um ooooookay and alrighty then.


I believe that he has IMO.

But how you infer from my post that because people change that everybody has changed is beyond me. Terrible argument IMO.

By your logic, if people do not change then I guess you think W is still a coke using alcoholic.


Opinions vary on both points. And HUH?! :roll:

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 5:21 pm
by Kiko
zwyts wrote:By your logic, if people do not change then I guess you think W is still a coke using alcoholic.


Good point zwyts.

Even if the quotes are 30 years old, I would agree with Teresa on this one:

...said of Kennedy, "I know some couples who stay together only for politics. If Ted Kennedy holds on to that marriage just for the Catholic vote, as some people say he does, then I think he's a perfect bastard."


He didn't though, did he? Hold onto the marriage. Guess he has changed.

As far as her statement about the Democratic Party... guess she saw the light. ;) ;)