Page 1 of 1

Flying Luxury Cruise Ship of the Future

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 9:46 am
by alicia-w
This is not a Blimp. It's a sort of flying Queen Mary 2 that could change the way you think about air travel. It's the Aeroscraft, and when it's completed, it will ferry pampered passengers across continents and oceans as they stroll leisurely about the one-acre cabin or relax in their well-appointed staterooms.

Unlike its dirigible ancestors, the Aeroscraft is not lighter than air. Its 14 million cubic feet of helium hoist only two thirds of the craft's weight.

The rigid and surprisingly aerodynamic body -- driven by huge rearward propellers -- generates enough additional lift to keep the behemoth and its 400-ton payload aloft while cruising.

During takeoff and landing, six turbofan jet engines push the ship up or ease its descent.

This two-football-fields-long concept airship is the brainchild of Igor Pasternak, whose privately-funded California firm, Worldwide Aeros Corporation, is in the early stages of developing a prototype and expects to have one completed by 2010.

Pasternak says several cruise ship companies have expressed interest in the project, and for good reason: The craft would have a range of several thousand miles and, with an estimated top speed of 174 miles per hour, could traverse the continental U.S. in about 18 hours.

During the flight, passengers would peer at national landmarks just 8,000 feet below or, if they weren't captivated by the view, the cavernous interior would easily accommodate such amenities as luxury staterooms, restaurants, even a casino.

To minimize noise, the aft-mounted propellers will be electric, powered by a renewable source such as hydrogen fuel cells. A sophisticated buoyancy-management system will serve the same purpose as trim on an airplane, allowing for precise adjustments in flight dynamics to compensate for outside conditions and passenger movement.

The automated system will draw outside air into compartments throughout the ship and compress it to manage onboard weight.

The company envisions a cargo-carrying version that could deliver a store's worth of merchandise from a centralized distribution center straight to a Wal-Mart parking lot or, because the helium-filled craft will float, a year's worth of supplies to an offshore oil rig.

"You can land on the snow, you can land on the water," Pasternak says. "It's a new vision of what can be done in the air."



Image

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 9:59 am
by Skywatch_NC
Looks like something out of a James Bond movie. 8-)

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 10:01 am
by alicia-w
my first question was why anyone want to take 18 hours to fly across the continental US?

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 10:27 am
by O Town
If it is anything like a luxury cruise ship, which is sounds like it is, the question would be, who wouldn't? :wink:

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 10:30 am
by alicia-w
this is just me talking, but it's bad enough to be stuck in the middle of nowhere with a ton of people, at least you can swim away if it sinks, but to be stuck in an airship? Nobody ever fell 20000 feet out of a Buick. I am not a cruise person. I am not a crowd person. This whole cruise thing doesnt appeal to me at all, sea or air.

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:21 am
by O Town
Ahhh, I was thinking about the saftey issues as well. I like the idea of it, but I don't know about floating over the atlantic in that thing, or any long stretch of ocean. I love being on boats though, big or little. To fish or to gamble and eat. Can't wait to go back on a cruise ship. And if it sank I highly doubt I would make it to shore, but I bet there would be someone there to rescue us, unlike that thing and falling 20,000 feet. But I would be tempted to give it a go, after it has been around about 10 years.

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:34 am
by greeng13
alicia-w wrote:this is just me talking, but it's bad enough to be stuck in the middle of nowhere with a ton of people, at least you can swim away if it sinks, but to be stuck in an airship? Nobody ever fell 20000 feet out of a Buick. I am not a cruise person. I am not a crowd person. This whole cruise thing doesnt appeal to me at all, sea or air.


I thought it said the maximum height of travel is 8000 feet :D

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 12:18 pm
by alicia-w
it's an expression... sheesh....