STORM2K

http://www.usmagazine.com/blog/index.php

Oh lovely joy.

jason0509 wrote:http://www.usmagazine.com/blog/index.php

Yes, but can we trust US magaziine? Their headlines are too close to what the National Enquirer runs each week, for me at least to trust them.

I'll wait for TV Guide, People and/or CNN to confirm. But it's not going to make my day.

If she is, I want to tell her - seriously, cross the legs honey and come up with a headache!

If she is, so be it. It isn't like she doesnt have the means to take care of them. Seems like she would have got back in shape though before spitting out another kid.

US Weekly has been right more often than not, although they have been screaming that she's pregnant since December so eventually they'll get it right.

She might have the means to take care of them, but clearly not the common sense. That dude already has THREE KIDS and NO JOB. And that gene pool is just....a puddle.

Isn't her other kid 7 months old?

And once again, K-Fed would be yelling "Po-po Push".

Wonder if she has FIGURED out what CAUSES this CONDITION? I seriously DOUBT IT......"Oops she did it AGAIN!"

Holy crap! I assume she was having sex before meeting this dude, so she must have known about condoms then right????

Yuck. Kids.

maybe she can repopulate new orleans!! i hope its a girl this time

It's not that strange. She probably wants to have all her kids at one time. This way when she's had as many as she wants (probably 2?) she can get back in shape and start up her career again.

^It's bad for her body if she really is pregnant, because she had a c-section. You need time to heal up after one of those and 7 months doesn't cut it (AMA recommends at least 18 months). Too soon and the mother risks complications during a second c-section.

She keeps this up and her belly will hang right down there with her husband's pants.

rainstorm wrote:maybe she can repopulate new orleans!! i hope its a girl this time

NO!

Miss Mary wrote:Yes, but can we trust US magaziine? Their headlines are too close to what the National Enquirer runs each week, for me at least to trust them.

I'm pretty sure it is. She is clearly pregnant in the picture.

You got to feel a little sorry for those kids. I mean she has no common sense at all...Also I was in the store in saw a paper that said the first one was brain damaged. Sad.

HurryKane wrote:^It's bad for her body if she really is pregnant, because she had a c-section. You need time to heal up after one of those and 7 months doesn't cut it (AMA recommends at least 18 months). Too soon and the mother risks complications during a second c-section.

She keeps this up and her belly will hang right down there with her husband's pants.

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:...I was in the store in saw a paper that said the first one was brain damaged. Sad.

Do you believe everything you read in a paper at the store?

HurryKane wrote:She keeps this up and her belly will hang right down there with her husband's pants.

Wonderful.

Britney have you ever heard of a Condom? What about a pill?