Debating whether to see “United 93”
Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 9:57 am
There has been much discussion (everywhere) about whether we should see this movie. I agree with this columnist (Ralph Bristow) who contends we should force ourselves to see it, even if we don't want to.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debating whether to see “United 93”
I haven’t decided yet whether I’m going to see the movie, “United 93,” about the plane that crashed in a field in Pennsylvania instead of into the U.S. Capital or the White House because of the brave men and women who overpowered the terrorists who took over the plan, and died in the process.
If you are ambivalent about the war on terrorism, you should see “United 93,” but I’m not. I understand and fully support the war. I have no misgivings about our effort to defeat al Qaeda and its supporters, no matter how long it takes.
“United 93” is described as a “painful tribute” to the passengers on the flight. AP reports: Rarely has a film, however critically praised, promised so much agony for viewers. "United 93" is 106 minutes of unrelenting pain with few precedents in cinematic history.
I suspect I would find “United 93” to be a very interesting, but depressing, movie. I generally don’t want movies to depress me. I also don’t believe I need to witness the horror to understand and appreciate it.
But, there is a part of me that says I should go see the movie to help honor those who were the first to fight back. The people on United Flight 93 weren’t just people who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. They were people who were in the wrong place at the wrong time, and made a difference by fighting back, preventing an even bigger disaster, dying in the process, and inspiring others. They are more than victims. They are real heroes.
Their story should be told, and it has been – in a gut-wrenching movie that pulls no punches. Perhaps we should force ourselves to see it, even if we don’t want to.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debating whether to see “United 93”
I haven’t decided yet whether I’m going to see the movie, “United 93,” about the plane that crashed in a field in Pennsylvania instead of into the U.S. Capital or the White House because of the brave men and women who overpowered the terrorists who took over the plan, and died in the process.
If you are ambivalent about the war on terrorism, you should see “United 93,” but I’m not. I understand and fully support the war. I have no misgivings about our effort to defeat al Qaeda and its supporters, no matter how long it takes.
“United 93” is described as a “painful tribute” to the passengers on the flight. AP reports: Rarely has a film, however critically praised, promised so much agony for viewers. "United 93" is 106 minutes of unrelenting pain with few precedents in cinematic history.
I suspect I would find “United 93” to be a very interesting, but depressing, movie. I generally don’t want movies to depress me. I also don’t believe I need to witness the horror to understand and appreciate it.
But, there is a part of me that says I should go see the movie to help honor those who were the first to fight back. The people on United Flight 93 weren’t just people who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. They were people who were in the wrong place at the wrong time, and made a difference by fighting back, preventing an even bigger disaster, dying in the process, and inspiring others. They are more than victims. They are real heroes.
Their story should be told, and it has been – in a gut-wrenching movie that pulls no punches. Perhaps we should force ourselves to see it, even if we don’t want to.