Page 1 of 1

San Fransisco Earthquakes

Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 11:17 pm
by JonathanBelles
3 in 4 days. I just saw it on the news and the last one was a 3.5. The news said it was weird to have 3 directly in the city in just 4 days.

Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 11:49 pm
by Lindaloo
I certainly hope that is not a sign of a bad one. I am praying!

Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 11:54 pm
by vbhoutex
Lindaloo wrote:I certainly hope that is not a sign of a bad one. I am praying!


Me too!! My Aunt and Uncle live close to there!!!

Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 12:02 am
by JonathanBelles

Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 12:41 am
by wx247
I had not heard about this. I hope things settle down there.

Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:03 am
by Brent
Yeah, I heard about it too. It is quite unusual.

Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:23 am
by wxmann_91
I haven't heard about it, but my uncle and cousins live there.

Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 8:22 am
by conestogo_flood
If there was 3 quakes in SF since Wednesday wouldn't they still be on the map?

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/rec ... 3.-121.php

I think they meant California in general.

Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 10:34 am
by Stephanie
Lindaloo wrote:I certainly hope that is not a sign of a bad one. I am praying!


I hope it isn't an ominous sign either. :eek:

I saw it on the news last night.

Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 10:42 am
by JonathanBelles
conestogo_flood wrote:If there was 3 quakes in SF since Wednesday wouldn't they still be on the map?

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/rec ... 3.-121.php

I think they meant California in general.


technically there are 3 in SF bay

Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 10:48 am
by conestogo_flood
fact789 wrote:
conestogo_flood wrote:If there was 3 quakes in SF since Wednesday wouldn't they still be on the map?

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/rec ... 3.-121.php

I think they meant California in general.


technically there are 3 in SF bay


I meant those 3.0's they were talking about on CNN. The 1.0ers and what not are common.