Page 1 of 1
The oldest person in the world has died on 1/24/07
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:39 pm
by cycloneye
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:55 pm
by kevin
Now we are children of the crisis of civilization.
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:39 am
by coriolis
Kevin, are you talking about WWI?
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 8:24 am
by TexasStooge
May he rest in peace.
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:49 pm
by kevin
coriolis wrote:Kevin, are you talking about WWI?
Yep. I'm afraid that as years go by people will begin to be overwhelmed by the numbers and general society won't have a clue what the years 1914-1945 meant.
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 8:14 pm
by brunota2003
kevin wrote:coriolis wrote:Kevin, are you talking about WWI?
Yep. I'm afraid that as years go by people will begin to be overwhelmed by the numbers and general society won't have a clue what the years 1914-1945 meant.
people have a hard time remembering what event took place in 2003...or (if your not into history or weren't there for the event) 1986. Feb 1, 2003 and Jan 28, 1986.
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:30 am
by Ixolib
Meaning no disrespect, isn't it true that the "headline" for this story cannot ever really be correct or factual?
I mean, as soon as the oldest person dies, he/she is no longer the oldest person since that title instantly transfered to the "living" oldest person.
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:58 pm
by cycloneye
Ixolib wrote:Meaning no disrespect, isn't it true that the "headline" for this story cannot ever really be correct or factual?
I mean, as soon as the oldest person dies, he/she is no longer the oldest person since that title instantly transfered to the "living" oldest person.
I edited the title to add the date of death.
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 6:14 pm
by coriolis
Ixolib wrote:Meaning no disrespect, isn't it true that the "headline" for this story cannot ever really be correct or factual?
I mean, as soon as the oldest person dies, he/she is no longer the oldest person since that title instantly transfered to the "living" oldest person.
Yes that is true. Thanks for clarifying that.
That's one title that people won't die for.
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:38 am
by Regit
Ixolib wrote:Meaning no disrespect, isn't it true that the "headline" for this story cannot ever really be correct or factual?
I mean, as soon as the oldest person dies, he/she is no longer the oldest person since that title instantly transfered to the "living" oldest person.
The title given to a person in an obituary is the title they had immediately prior to the time of death, so it's both journalistically and gramatically correct.
