Page 1 of 1

Nickelback doesn't chance musical expression.

Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:27 am
by Cyclone1
Nickelback never changes.

For the Nickelback fans/haters

As a fan of their older stuff, I found this hilarious.

Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:24 am
by Tstormwatcher
I don't understand? :?: :?:

Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:30 am
by Cyclone1
Two Nickelback songs played simultaneously. They're basically the same song.

Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:36 am
by Squarethecircle
XD

Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:51 pm
by Yankeegirl
ha ha ha ha ha!!! So true!! I liked them when they first came out, but got sick of the same sound they had in every song!

Re:

Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:39 pm
by lurkey
Yankeegirl wrote:ha ha ha ha ha!!! So true!! I liked them when they first came out, but got sick of the same sound they had in every song!



Sorta like Creed. ..

Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:23 am
by Regit
Don't most bands tend to produce songs that sound similar?

Though all it really proves is that the songs are timed similarly.

Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:05 am
by DanKellFla
That is why it is called show BUSINESS and not show ART. If it works for them and people listen too it, that is just how it is. Aerosmith songs in the past 15 years are basically the same as well. And Pink Floyd never did get around to learning that 4th chord.

Re:

Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:17 pm
by Squarethecircle
DanKellFla wrote:That is why it is called show BUSINESS and not show ART. If it works for them and people listen too it, that is just how it is. Aerosmith songs in the past 15 years are basically the same as well. And Pink Floyd never did get around to learning that 4th chord.


Some peoples' lives consisted entirely of humming those same three chords OVER AND OVER AGAIN! It's really annoying.

Re: Nickelback doesn't chance musical expression.

Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:25 pm
by lurkey
. . at least they're not the Spice Girls, Britney Spears or <insert any "boy band" name>. .. . which to me is true bottom of the barrel of American pop or rock music . . .

ETA: I want to clear something up. I did not intend to infer that Nickelback was just some "boy band". I meant 'Nysc, Backstreet Boys, etc. .. . . I enjoy listening to Nickelback. I cringe when I hear 'Nysc, BB etc. . . and Britney Spears is the reason I no longer listen to Top 40 radio. Listening to "Toxic" . . .not once in an hour, but FOUR times on the same station within ONE hour . . . was enough to drive me permanently to the country and rock stations. Actually most of the time, I listen to my iPod that is hooked via FM transmitter.

Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:19 pm
by Cyclone1
Hey, I really like Nickelback. I do. I own their CD's, but everyone has always kinda noticed the vast similarities between those two songs. Nothing wrong with it, just funny.

Plus, I love both of those songs, and I think it sounds wicked awesome when theyre played together.

Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:48 pm
by Squarethecircle
:uarrow: I actually thought that it was one song the first few times.

Re:

Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:11 pm
by arkess7
DanKellFla wrote:That is why it is called show BUSINESS and not show ART. If it works for them and people listen too it, that is just how it is. Aerosmith songs in the past 15 years are basically the same as well. And Pink Floyd never did get around to learning that 4th chord.


Yea I agree.....Nickelback rocks........sounds the same but the words are different but same crap.......about how this or that relationship didnt work! :lol: WELL ISNT THAT LIFE PEOPLE! :grrr: BTW Aerosmith rocks too........my fav by them is "sweet emotion". I was born in 73 and Pink Floyd has always annoyed me/ :eek: :lol: :lol:

Re: Nickelback doesn't chance musical expression.

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:26 pm
by Tstormwatcher
For those who like Nickleback, check this out.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7uSlqI1AVUk&NR=1

Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 1:27 pm
by Cyclone1
XD XD XD That's awesome!