CAT 5 Hurricane Dean - Archived threads

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

Re: Re:

#7521 Postby Stratosphere747 » Sat Aug 18, 2007 12:58 am

Air Force Met wrote:
Stratosphere747 wrote:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:BTW, for anybody just clicking onto this thread. You can see an image of the new GFS, UKMET and GFDL runs on page 141.


Shows a Mexico LF....;)


Also shows a 360 mile shift to the north over the previous run and it keeps the upper low further south and closer to Dean...as some of the other models do (which have been showing a more WNW/NW motion at the end).


Dang it AFM...

Trying to keep the natives is check...;)
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

Re: Major Hurricane DEAN: (11PM page 192) Discussions, Analysis

#7522 Postby senorpepr » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:01 am

WxGuy1 wrote:Anyone happen to know the eye temperature from a Wilma VDM?



URNT12 KNHC 190835
VORTEX DATA MESSAGE
A. 19/08:00:30Z
B. 17 deg 03 min N
082 deg 20 min W
C. 700 mb 2082 m
D. NA kt
E. NA deg nm
F. 320 deg 166 kt
G. 221 deg 003 nm
H. 884 mb
I. 10 C/ 3073 m
J. 24 C/ 3043 m
K. 10 C/ NA
L. CLOSED
M. C4
N. 12345/ 7
O. 0.02 / 1 nm
P. AF308 0724A WILMA OB 16
MAX FL WIND 168 KT SE QUAD 06:10:20 Z
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: Hurricane DEAN: Global Models

#7523 Postby Air Force Met » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:01 am

Clint_TX wrote:Nelson you sure are the taskmaster!


Isn't it past your bed time Clint? :lol:

As for the question on where I think it will go...I would like the models to stop flipping around and get a little better handle on the upper low before I commit to anything. But...my first instinct...and what I've been briefing because the bosses have been asking...is B/W Corpus and Matagorda. I initially said "Probably the same place as Erin."

We need to pay attention to the upper low...that is the 400 lb Gorilla in this equation. I don't trust the GFS because 1) it is looking at a weak system and steering it that way...and Dean ins't weak...and 2) It handles upper lows pretty awfully.
0 likes   

MWatkins
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:51 pm
Location: SE Florida
Contact:

Re: Hurricane DEAN: Global Models

#7524 Postby MWatkins » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:02 am

0Z UKMET initialization is an apparent disaster...at 14.3N? Then...amazingly...the cyclone travels 1.7 degrees N in 12 hours and is up at 16N?

Why? Is the model tracking the wrong bogused center?

Or is the text product just that unreliable?

MW
0 likes   

Scorpion

#7525 Postby Scorpion » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:03 am

Food for thought... fast moving hurricanes tend to bring alot more momentum upon landfall than slow movers. They don't weaken nearly as fast upon landfall nor do they have as much time to ingest dry air or shallower waters. It would not surprise me at all to see Dean hit as a 4 or 5 at Texas
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#7526 Postby wxmann_91 » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:03 am

I don't think the 10% reduction factor really works here, since the cloud tops are rather warm and the strongest gusts may not be brought down to the sfc. What does SFMR say?

To WxGuy1, Emily was declared a Cat 5 in reanalysis, during which the pressure bottomed out at *only* 929 mb. With the high background pressures, I wouldn't rule out a weird pressure-wind relationship out of this storm.
0 likes   

User avatar
Clint_TX
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu May 01, 2003 8:31 am

Re: Hurricane DEAN: Global Models

#7527 Postby Clint_TX » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:04 am

Air Force Met wrote:
Clint_TX wrote:Nelson you sure are the taskmaster!


Isn't it past your bed time Clint? :lol:

As for the question on where I think it will go...I would like the models to stop flipping around and get a little better handle on the upper low before I commit to anything. But...my first instinct...and what I've been briefing because the bosses have been asking...is B/W Corpus and Matagorda. I initially said "Probably the same place as Erin."

We need to pay attention to the upper low...that is the 400 lb Gorilla in this equation. I don't trust the GFS because 1) it is looking at a weak system and steering it that way...and Dean ins't weak...and 2) It handles upper lows pretty awfully.



All signs point to a large healthy storm come landfall right?
0 likes   

User avatar
Recurve
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1640
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:59 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: Major Hurricane DEAN: (11PM page 192) Discussions, Analysis

#7528 Postby Recurve » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:05 am

Image
0 likes   

la wave
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:58 pm

#7529 Postby la wave » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:05 am

Pixals are usually square. They do not represent supernatural icons like crosses,etc. Weather is based on science and reason, not supernatural beliefs. Please, let's keep it that way. Thank you
0 likes   

TTheriot1975
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 113
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:12 pm
Location: Southeast Texas

#7530 Postby TTheriot1975 » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:06 am

AFM....Do you think that Galveston or SETX could still be in the path?

Also...if it hits Matagorda..with it being such a powerful storm, what would the effects be in Port Arthur?
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: Hurricane DEAN: Global Models

#7531 Postby Air Force Met » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:06 am

Clint_TX wrote:
Air Force Met wrote:
Clint_TX wrote:Nelson you sure are the taskmaster!


Isn't it past your bed time Clint? :lol:

As for the question on where I think it will go...I would like the models to stop flipping around and get a little better handle on the upper low before I commit to anything. But...my first instinct...and what I've been briefing because the bosses have been asking...is B/W Corpus and Matagorda. I initially said "Probably the same place as Erin."

We need to pay attention to the upper low...that is the 400 lb Gorilla in this equation. I don't trust the GFS because 1) it is looking at a weak system and steering it that way...and Dean ins't weak...and 2) It handles upper lows pretty awfully.



All signs point to a large healthy storm come landfall right?


Well...if it's large I could see it getting knocked down a category by some dry air entrainment as it nears the coast.
0 likes   

mgpetre
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:20 pm

#7532 Postby mgpetre » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:08 am

I think AFM is a better forecaster than I am by leaps and bounds, but to see him agree that it will be very close to Erin's path just scares the b'jesus out of me.... I pray if it is correct that Dean will have dissipated some by then. Long week that's for sure. And to think I have to try and do code tomorrow. Good night all.
0 likes   

User avatar
Recurve
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1640
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:59 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: Major Hurricane DEAN: (11PM page 192) Discussions, Analysis

#7533 Postby Recurve » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:08 am

:uarrow: ??????
What are you referring to?
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: Hurricane DEAN: Global Models

#7534 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:09 am

If the GFDL landfall and intensity were both correct, Galveston would get a cat 3 strike, or the equivalent of the last big direct hit, 1983's Alicia.
Last edited by Ed Mahmoud on Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

mgpetre
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:20 pm

Re:

#7535 Postby mgpetre » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:10 am

la wave wrote:Pixals are usually square. They do not represent supernatural icons like crosses,etc. Weather is based on science and reason, not supernatural beliefs. Please, let's keep it that way. Thank you


Still, pixels or not, that was a rare image. Science and religion always meet in the face of disaster, calamity and suffering.

Good night all and good luck to all in the island of Jamaica.
0 likes   

User avatar
mobilebay
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1853
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 1:22 am
Location: Mobile, Alabama

does anyone have the link to

#7536 Postby mobilebay » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:10 am

the buoy that the NHC was referring to in the last discussion?
0 likes   

TTheriot1975
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 113
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:12 pm
Location: Southeast Texas

#7537 Postby TTheriot1975 » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:11 am

AFM....Do you think that Galveston or SETX could still be in the path?

Also...if it hits Matagorda..with it being such a powerful storm, what would the effects be in Port Arthur?
0 likes   

User avatar
Recurve
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1640
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:59 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: Major Hurricane DEAN: (11PM page 192) Discussions, Analysis

#7538 Postby Recurve » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:13 am

I'm baffled. Where was the post that veered this to pixels and religion?
0 likes   

mgpetre
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:20 pm

Re: Hurricane DEAN: Global Models

#7539 Postby mgpetre » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:14 am

Ed Mahmoud wrote:If the GFDL landfall and intensity were both correct, Galveston would get a cat 3 strike, or the equivalent of the last big direct hit, 1983's Alicia.


I've got a feeling that Alicia pales in comparison in many ways. I've read a little about its history and she was not that big really and was very fast moving. I think Dean (2007) as a cat 3 would be much more devastating...
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurrilurker
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 728
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 3:32 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: Major Hurricane DEAN: (11PM page 192) Discussions, Analysis

#7540 Postby Hurrilurker » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:14 am

Recurve wrote:I'm baffled. Where was the post that veered this to pixels and religion?
Someone saw a cross shape in the eye on one of the sat images. And probably a face in a pastry too!
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests