INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
LSU2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1711
Age: 56
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 11:01 pm
Location: Cut Off, Louisiana

Re: Re:

#961 Postby LSU2001 » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:44 pm

wxman57 wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:cannot issue warnings if there is no TC


Hi, all, thought I'd chime in before dinner. I've been looking at this thing since 5am. Derek, your quote above is probably one of the best reasons for the NHC to be lenient and upgrade it to a TD. I do think it has a much better-defined LLC than Grace ever did. What's lacking, as AFM said, is any significant effects over the lease areas. I was surprised the NHC didn't upgrade it at 4pm.

The NHC's primary job is to warn the public of potential threats from tropical cyclones. Sometimes, they may have to "fudge it" a little so that they can accomplish their mission. I've seen it discussed on this thread before that the NHC would upgrade something in the Gulf or near the southeast U.S. coast that they'd never upgrade by Africa or in the open Atlantic. That's because there is a possible threat to the public. In this case, it seems fairly obvious that this will very likely become at least a minimal TS before moving ashore into the lower to mid TX coast Thursday morning. If the NHC waits until 4am to call it a TD, then that's only about 24 hours lead time for any preparations. Why not just call it a TD this afternoon (or this evening, now) a little early to give the public a little extra time to do whatever they have to do? I have great respect for the NHC forecasters, they have a tough job. Must have been a long discussion about what to do this afternoon. But I don't think they'll wait to upgrade it tomorrow morning.

Oh, and my gut feeling says north of Corpus Christi. The LLC will form beneath the ball of convection near 24.8N/90W not out in the open where it was initialized at 00z. Probably a 40-45 mph TS (in small pockets). Nothing too significant.

Doesn't really matter to me much, except that we put out the word to our clients early last Friday about potential development Mon/Tue in the SW Gulf and one client called in to complain that we were "alarmists", saying the NHC was forecasting "no development", as was one private wx company that I won't name here which just repackages NHC advisories. I explained that the NHC was only talking about potential development through Saturday, not through the following week. So it better develop! Come on, Erin! Ok, I'll take a TD 5, if nothing else! ;-)


here ya go bailey,
wxman57 is a pro met
Tim
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 52
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#962 Postby ROCK » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:44 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:
lrak wrote:its a perfect circle moving West right now. :double:
I don't see a west movement ATM. I see a very slow WNW or NW movement.



yep as do I...the BAM models intiated the center wrong in their run- BTW way to far south
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#963 Postby Stratosphere747 » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:49 pm

I think we may need to come under the realization that it's just not developing like many thought. Next advisory/TWO will hopefully gives us a better idea.
0 likes   

User avatar
lrak
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1770
Age: 57
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#964 Postby lrak » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:49 pm

that little blob is no way moving NW.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#965 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:50 pm

lrak wrote:that little blob is no way moving NW.
It's in no way moving due W either. Probably more WNW.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22482
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Re:

#966 Postby wxman57 » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:50 pm

miamicanes177 wrote:
srainhoutx wrote:Great Post wxman57. Tough day at the office? I agree with an advisory classifing this shortly. 24 hours is not enough time for the public to react.
This was called disturbance invest 91L on the 00Z models. Therefore, I put the chances of this being called tropical depression 5 by 10pm tonight at less than 1%


Yeah, saw that. Generally the NHC will call it "Five" vs. "Disturbance" on the model data before upgrading it. Might not in a close call, though.
0 likes   

User avatar
HollynLA
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 836
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:36 pm
Location: South Louisiana

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#967 Postby HollynLA » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:51 pm

I thought they initialized much too far south as well. It looks as though it's smack dab in the middle of the GOM. From everything I've seen though, it's supposed to go to about the central Texas coastline. It's just taking it's sweet time doing that. :hmm:
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22482
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#968 Postby wxman57 » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:54 pm

cpdaman wrote:the only logical thing i can think of for lack of an upgrade is the NHC's belief that this WILL NOT RAPIDLY INTENSIFY

i mean WHAT big Preparations need to be made for a weak-mod tropical storm....snip


I do agree with you there. That's the only reason I could see for the NHC not upgrading it early - if they think it won't develop at all. Otherwise, it would be better to upgrade early vs. late, even though there really aren't any big preparations to make for something so weak.
0 likes   

User avatar
teal61
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 134
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 9:20 pm
Location: Spring, TX

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#969 Postby teal61 » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:54 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:
lrak wrote:that little blob is no way moving NW.
It's in no way moving due W either. Probably more WNW.



More Likely what you see is the cloud shield expanding to the west giving the appearance of a due west movement. Honestly right now its seems to be going nowhere to fast as it organizes. But if there is any movement its to the WNW to NW.
0 likes   

User avatar
weatherrabbit_tx
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 270
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 3:13 pm
Location: Kingwood,Tx
Contact:

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#970 Postby weatherrabbit_tx » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:56 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:
lrak wrote:that little blob is no way moving NW.
It's in no way moving due W either. Probably more WNW.


seems like the "blob" is growing!
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#971 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:56 pm

wxman57 wrote:
cpdaman wrote:the only logical thing i can think of for lack of an upgrade is the NHC's belief that this WILL NOT RAPIDLY INTENSIFY

i mean WHAT big Preparations need to be made for a weak-mod tropical storm....snip


I do agree with you there. That's the only reason I could see for the NHC not upgrading it early - if they think it won't develop at all. Otherwise, it would be better to upgrade early vs. late, even though there really aren't any big preparations to make for something so weak.


It will be upgraded at the time it's has to be upgraded.
Last edited by HURAKAN on Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

superfly
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 938
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 2:13 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA

#972 Postby superfly » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:57 pm

Navy site has this as 05L.NONAME now.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139080
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#973 Postby cycloneye » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:57 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
lrak
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1770
Age: 57
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#974 Postby lrak » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:58 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:
lrak wrote:its a perfect circle moving West right now. :double:
I don't see a west movement ATM. I see a very slow WNW or NW movement.



Ok I did the ruler technique and put it on the lcd and watched the white part of the looped gif. It went straight WEST. :P

Do it yourself, set it on medium and 12 runs. It will move the highest cloud tops in that blob due West.
http://www.ghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/goeseastconusir.html
0 likes   

User avatar
LSU2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1711
Age: 56
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 11:01 pm
Location: Cut Off, Louisiana

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#975 Postby LSU2001 » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:58 pm

must be about to be upgraded maybe 10:30?
Tim
0 likes   

Scorpion

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions NRL has it as NONAME

#976 Postby Scorpion » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:58 pm

TD 5 here we come
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#977 Postby RL3AO » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:59 pm

Nice job NHC.
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4391
Age: 42
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

#978 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:59 pm

Had to be done...Erin you will not live long..
0 likes   

User avatar
LSU2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1711
Age: 56
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 11:01 pm
Location: Cut Off, Louisiana

Re:

#979 Postby LSU2001 » Tue Aug 14, 2007 9:00 pm

DESTRUCTION5 wrote:Had to be done...Erin you will not live long..


GOOD!!! :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
Sean in New Orleans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:26 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA 30.0N 90.0W
Contact:

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#980 Postby Sean in New Orleans » Tue Aug 14, 2007 9:01 pm

lrak wrote:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:
lrak wrote:its a perfect circle moving West right now. :double:
I don't see a west movement ATM. I see a very slow WNW or NW movement.



Ok I did the ruler technique and put it on the lcd and watched the white part of the looped gif. It went straight WEST. :P

Do it yourself, set it on medium and 12 runs. It will move the highest cloud tops in that blob due West.
http://www.ghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/goeseastconusir.html


Where are the clouds moving about 75 to 100 miles to the S. of Galveston? Watch. Why are you watching where it is moving now? Aren't you watching where it will be moving in the future? That's what really matters, IMO. Watch where the clouds seem to be "giving way." It's where the storms go, based on what I've seen.
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 127 guests