Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions & Images

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#121 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:50 pm

So far this system has not shown sings of organization, but nonetheless, I have to agree on the fact that tomorrow is the peak of the hurricane season and it's September, anything can happen. Something that I have to give it is persistance. More or less it has persisted over the past few days.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 53
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#122 Postby ROCK » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:51 pm

Update: just by looking at the latest vis.....anyone see that circulation to the north of the main blob off the Yuc? looks to be moving north.....
0 likes   

User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 66
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

Re:

#123 Postby srainhoutx » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:54 pm

HURAKAN wrote:So far this system has not shown sings of organization, but nonetheless, I have to agree on the fact that tomorrow is the peak of the hurricane season and it's September, anything can happen. Something that I have to give it is persistance. More or less it has persisted over the past few days.


I have to agree with persistence.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5273
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#124 Postby Ptarmigan » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:57 pm

Ivanhater wrote:CMC sends 90L north to Mobile Pensacola area FWIW

Image


They can take all the moisture because they really need it.
0 likes   

mattpetre
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 510
Age: 52
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:20 pm
Location: Missouri City,TX & Galleria
Contact:

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#125 Postby mattpetre » Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:05 pm

ROCK wrote:
mattpetre wrote:
ROCK wrote:looking at the vis and can't understand why this has T#'s that high...if anything it should be to weak...maybe they got mixed up with all the invests....I am looking at the vis and see nothing remotely at the surface....has good upper air divergence but no low level convergence....

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... g8dvg.html


I disagree in that from the visibles before this began to pop again there was some convergence going on just north of the Yucatan. I think it was very localized, but seemed to be maintaining something at the lower levels for almost 24 hours now.



Matt, I guess we agree to disagree... :D but if you look at the last Qscat (decending pass) not much of any surface reflection going on except maybe off the Cuba west coast. This is backed up by the CIMSS low level convergance map......the area in question has good upper air divergence but is lacking surface support....


Yes, and if I weren't using a little bit of just gut feeling here, I very well might be in total agreement with you because the Quikscat doesn't seem to agree with my interpretations of the visibles either... so I may just be seeing something that isn't there... wait and see.
0 likes   

User avatar
hriverajr
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 786
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 12:16 am

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#126 Postby hriverajr » Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:17 pm

I just don't see it moving straight north.. more of a texas thing I think.. if it develops.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#127 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:20 pm

I do not have the slightest clue as to how one could get a T 1.5/1.5 out of this mess
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 33
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#128 Postby JonathanBelles » Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:21 pm

http://www.srh.noaa.gov/productview.php ... &version=0

http://www.srh.noaa.gov/forecast/MapCli ... &map.y=150

Things are starting to pop here. The chances of rain went from 30 to 60% for today and 70% tomorrow.

Talking to MSH in chat and his chances went up too. I'm now thinking that cold front might get well into FL.
0 likes   

fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

Re:

#129 Postby fasterdisaster » Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:26 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:I do not have the slightest clue as to how one could get a T 1.5/1.5 out of this mess


I agree. This is one of the worst looking invests I have ever seen. The conditions sure aren't great, and this looking like garbage sure isn't helping.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 53
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re:

#130 Postby ROCK » Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:27 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:I do not have the slightest clue as to how one could get a T 1.5/1.5 out of this mess



yeah, thinking that myself....if anything it should be "too weak"....
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139095
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#131 Postby cycloneye » Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:28 pm

I would put that 1.5/1.5 to 91L.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31390
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#132 Postby KWT » Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:30 pm

Yeah I agree, this looks a real mess, they've mixed up 91L and 90L, they should really be the other way round, I'm sure of it!!
i'm not sure its the worst invest I've seen though, there have been worse!
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 53
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#133 Postby ROCK » Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:43 pm

again...... anyone care to comment on what looks to be a weak exposed surface low at 25N and 88W??....convection be sheard off to the sw....looks to be moving north...I think Lyons mentioned something to this effect earlier today....


http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-vis.html
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#134 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:59 pm

Of the three Invests, this is by far the worst. It has little chance of developing right now.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10348
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#135 Postby Sanibel » Sun Sep 09, 2007 3:01 pm

Remember, the main Gulf is ready for a real cyclone instead of those ragged TS's.
0 likes   

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5248
Age: 40
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

Re:

#136 Postby PTrackerLA » Sun Sep 09, 2007 3:04 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:Of the three Invests, this is by far the worst. It has little chance of developing right now.


Not so sure about that. I see what appears to be an LLC trying to develop north of the Yucatan and convection has increased in this area and the Yucatan channel this afternoon. I don't think it will have the opportunity to become a hurricane but I would not be surprised to see a TS out of this. I'd also bank on 91L and 92L become named storms as well.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5594
Age: 36
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#137 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Sun Sep 09, 2007 3:05 pm

Convection has increased. I have no idea
where this will go...the synoptics are too confusing.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#138 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun Sep 09, 2007 3:07 pm

I just looked at QuikSCAT - http://manati.orbit.nesdis.noaa.gov/dat ... MBds19.png - and there is nothing remotely resembling a circulation in there.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139095
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#139 Postby cycloneye » Sun Sep 09, 2007 3:08 pm

Image

Convection has increased but no LLC seen.

Image
0 likes   

fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

Re: Re:

#140 Postby fasterdisaster » Sun Sep 09, 2007 3:19 pm

PTrackerLA wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:Of the three Invests, this is by far the worst. It has little chance of developing right now.


Not so sure about that. I see what appears to be an LLC trying to develop north of the Yucatan and convection has increased in this area and the Yucatan channel this afternoon. I don't think it will have the opportunity to become a hurricane but I would not be surprised to see a TS out of this. I'd also bank on 91L and 92L become named storms as well.


I see no low-level-center whatsoever, and convection doesn't matter at all if there is no discernible organization above that of my workroom desk.
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests