Tropical Depression INGRID: Global & BAM Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Tropical Depression INGRID: Global & BAM Models

#1 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Sep 09, 2007 8:17 am

Let the models run here!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139082
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: 91L: Global & BAM Models=First Model Plots Shortly

#2 Postby cycloneye » Sun Sep 09, 2007 8:29 am

477
WHXX01 KWBC 091327
CHGHUR
TROPICAL CYCLONE GUIDANCE MESSAGE
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
1327 UTC SUN SEP 9 2007

DISCLAIMER...NUMERICAL MODELS ARE SUBJECT TO LARGE ERRORS.
PLEASE REFER TO NHC OFFICIAL FORECASTS FOR TROPICAL CYCLONE
AND SUBTROPICAL CYCLONE INFORMATION.

ATLANTIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR

DISTURBANCE INVEST (AL912007) 20070909 1200 UTC

...00 HRS... ...12 HRS... ...24 HRS. .. ...36 HRS...
070909 1200 070910 0000 070910 1200 070911 0000

LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMS 10.0N 33.0W 10.4N 34.6W 10.7N 36.0W 11.1N 37.2W
BAMD 10.0N 33.0W 10.4N 35.1W 10.7N 37.2W 10.8N 39.1W
BAMM 10.0N 33.0W 10.4N 34.9W 10.6N 36.7W 10.9N 38.3W
LBAR 10.0N 33.0W 10.5N 35.4W 10.9N 38.3W 11.5N 41.1W
SHIP 20KTS 26KTS 33KTS 41KTS
DSHP 20KTS 26KTS 33KTS 41KTS

...48 HRS... ...72 HRS... ...96 HRS. .. ..120 HRS...
070911 1200 070912 1200 070913 1200 070914 1200

LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMS 11.7N 38.1W 13.6N 39.5W 16.3N 42.2W 19.1N 46.4W
BAMD 10.9N 40.9W 11.1N 44.0W 11.6N 46.5W 11.9N 48.5W
BAMM 11.1N 39.8W 12.1N 42.1W 13.5N 43.4W 14.7N 45.1W
LBAR 11.9N 43.9W 12.8N 49.2W 13.5N 52.9W 13.5N 55.0W
SHIP 51KTS 66KTS 72KTS 75KTS
DSHP 51KTS 66KTS 72KTS 75KTS

...INITIAL CONDITIONS...
LATCUR = 10.0N LONCUR = 33.0W DIRCUR = 275DEG SPDCUR = 12KT
LATM12 = 9.8N LONM12 = 30.5W DIRM12 = 275DEG SPDM12 = 12KT
LATM24 = 9.6N LONM24 = 28.0W
WNDCUR = 20KT RMAXWD = 60NM WNDM12 = 20KT
CENPRS = 1011MB OUTPRS = 1012MB OUTRAD = 200NM SDEPTH = M
RD34NE = 0NM RD34SE = 0NM RD34SW = 0NM RD34NW = 0NM
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#3 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Sep 09, 2007 8:31 am

The BAM family needs to get together and talk about days 3-5!!!

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139082
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: 91L: Global & BAM Models=First Model Plots Posted

#4 Postby cycloneye » Sun Sep 09, 2007 8:32 am

The only one of the BAM models that go fishing is the BAMS.The rest go west to westnorthwest.
0 likes   

User avatar
Meso
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1608
Age: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: South Africa
Contact:

#5 Postby Meso » Sun Sep 09, 2007 8:34 am

The SHIPS is showing some pretty rapid strengthening,it could be an issue if it moves west.Even if there is a weakness,if it doesn't catch it early,could end up being a small threat for the islands.
0 likes   

User avatar
canegrl04
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2486
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Texas

Re: 91L: Global & BAM Models=First Model Plots Posted

#6 Postby canegrl04 » Sun Sep 09, 2007 8:37 am

I'm anxious to see what GFS,GDFL and NOGAPS show for 91L
0 likes   

User avatar
Meso
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1608
Age: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: South Africa
Contact:

#7 Postby Meso » Sun Sep 09, 2007 8:38 am

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
canegrl04
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2486
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Texas

Re:

#8 Postby canegrl04 » Sun Sep 09, 2007 8:41 am

Meso wrote:Image


Unlike Dean and Felix,initialization points more northward with the models.Looks unlikely to be a CA threat. US or out to sea with this one
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22482
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: 91L: Global & BAM Models=First Model Plots Posted

#9 Postby wxman57 » Sun Sep 09, 2007 8:43 am

High pressure north of 91L is much weaker than with Felix or Dean. This one has a good chance of recurving out to sea. Much better chance of developing than that 90L in the southern Gulf.
0 likes   

User avatar
Gustywind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 12334
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:29 am
Location: Baie-Mahault, GUADELOUPE

#10 Postby Gustywind » Sun Sep 09, 2007 8:53 am

Cycloneye wrote:
"The only one of the BAM models that go fishing is the BAMS.The rest go west to westnorthwest".

I 've noticed that, firts plots does'nt take it far away of the islands Luis... :eek:, to close for comfort hope it will fish quicky because the more west track before his classification in Td in the next 48h put us in a suspicious position. The more it develops quickly is good news for us, but the later meant a little worrying trend...:spam:
Only one model for the fish, doesn't like this for the moment hope this will change in the next 24h!!!
:eek:
0 likes   

O Town
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5203
Age: 50
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Orlando, Florida 28°35'35"N 81°22'55"W

#11 Postby O Town » Sun Sep 09, 2007 8:53 am

Interesting how far apart the BAMs are, they usually are pretty close together.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#12 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Sep 09, 2007 9:16 am

that implies some strong NE shear may occur over the system
0 likes   

User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 52
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

Re: 91L: Global & BAM Models

#13 Postby Vortex » Sun Sep 09, 2007 9:22 am

Agree with Wxman...Given the weakness in later periods as indicated by the globals at this point it's likely to recurve well east of the islands...
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22482
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: 91L: Global & BAM Models

#14 Postby wxman57 » Sun Sep 09, 2007 9:29 am

Even though this is my 14th straight 10-15 hour day shift, I'd take a fish storm out of this. I have a bet with my boss that there are at least 5 named storms in September. Winner buys the other lunch. Had 2 the first week, need 3 more named storms. :woo:

That said, 91L doesn't look like it's going to develop today or tomorrow, or probably the next day. Maybe down the road in 3-4 days. It does look considerably more impressive than 90L.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 52
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: 91L: Global & BAM Models

#15 Postby ROCK » Sun Sep 09, 2007 9:34 am

wxman57 wrote:Even though this is my 14th straight 10-15 hour day shift, I'd take a fish storm out of this. I have a bet with my boss that there are at least 5 named storms in September. Winner buys the other lunch. Had 2 the first week, need 3 more named storms. :woo:

That said, 91L doesn't look like it's going to develop today or tomorrow, or probably the next day. Maybe down the road in 3-4 days. It does look considerably more impressive than 90L.




You might get that lunch with some new activity near the Leeward islands today. That BTW looks a lot better than 90L or 91L at this pont.


but back on topic- 91L does not develope in 4 days your talking a track more westward and a threat to the islands. Dr Masters did say this is a similar synopic set-up as which spawned Dean.
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanetrack
HurricaneTrack.com
HurricaneTrack.com
Posts: 1774
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:46 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

#16 Postby hurricanetrack » Sun Sep 09, 2007 9:37 am

The longer it takes to develop, the more the potential threat to land, generally speaking.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139082
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re:

#17 Postby cycloneye » Sun Sep 09, 2007 9:39 am

hurricanetrack wrote:The longer it takes to develop, the more the potential threat to land, generally speaking.


Agree 100% with that.
0 likes   

User avatar
Gustywind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 12334
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:29 am
Location: Baie-Mahault, GUADELOUPE

#18 Postby Gustywind » Sun Sep 09, 2007 9:44 am

hurricanetrack wrote:
The longer it takes to develop, the more the potential threat to land, generally speaking.

Cycloneye wrote:
Agree 100% with that.

Absolutely guys , hey Luis what are you thougts concerning the path?
0 likes   

User avatar
Gustywind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 12334
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:29 am
Location: Baie-Mahault, GUADELOUPE

#19 Postby Gustywind » Sun Sep 09, 2007 9:47 am

If it develops later i tkink that the chances are higher for a slight threat on our islands...day after day if it continues like that...and apparently no developement before 48-72h...not good, the worst trend for a beginning! :spam:
0 likes   

User avatar
crownweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 576
Age: 49
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:21 am
Location: Sturbridge, Massachusetts
Contact:

#20 Postby crownweather » Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:31 am

* ATLANTIC SHIPS INTENSITY FORECAST *
* GOES/OHC INPUT INCLUDED *
* INVEST AL912007 09/09/07 12 UTC *

TIME (HR) 0 6 12 18 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
V (KT) NO LAND 20 22 26 29 33 41 51 60 66 70 72 73 75
V (KT) LAND 20 22 26 29 33 41 51 60 66 70 72 73 75
V (KT) LGE mod 20 21 22 23 24 28 32 37 43 48 54 58 63

SHEAR (KTS) 6 8 8 11 10 6 9 10 9 8 10 9 5
SHEAR DIR 82 138 73 90 82 76 19 38 35 63 83 126 32
SST (C) 27.6 27.5 27.5 27.5 27.5 27.4 27.4 27.2 27.0 26.8 26.8 26.8 26.9
POT. INT. (KT) 132 130 130 130 130 128 127 125 122 119 119 120 121
ADJ. POT. INT. 132 129 128 128 127 125 123 120 116 112 111 112 112
200 MB T (C) -54.1 -53.3 -53.8 -54.2 -54.1 -53.7 -53.9 -53.6 -53.9 -53.7 -53.8 -53.6 -53.8
TH_E DEV (C) 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 7 8 8 8 9
700-500 MB RH 71 71 69 68 66 66 68 68 71 75 69 69 62
GFS VTEX (KT) 9 9 9 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 LOST LOST LOST
850 MB ENV VOR 76 80 80 67 57 48 49 47 42 21 14 13 11
200 MB DIV 66 74 94 95 73 80 58 84 60 90 61 77 19
LAND (KM) 1630 1602 1582 1560 1544 1544 1476 1394 1345 1346 1363 1384 1352
LAT (DEG N) 10.0 10.2 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.9 11.1 11.5 12.1 12.8 13.5 14.2 14.7
LONG(DEG W) 33.0 34.0 34.9 35.8 36.7 38.3 39.8 41.0 42.1 42.8 43.4 44.0 45.1
STM SPEED (KT) 11 10 9 9 8 8 7 6 6 5 5 5 5
HEAT CONTENT 9 12 10 8 11 11 11 11 11 9 10 10 12

FORECAST TRACK FROM BAMM INITIAL HEADING/SPEED (DEG/KT):275/ 12 CX,CY: -11/ 1
T-12 MAX WIND: 20 PRESSURE OF STEERING LEVEL (MB): 519 (MEAN=625)
GOES IR BRIGHTNESS TEMP. STD DEV. 100-300 KM RAD: 26.4 (MEAN=20.0)
% GOES IR PIXELS WITH T < -20 C 50-200 KM RAD: 47.0 (MEAN=69.0)

INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO INTENSITY CHANGE
6 12 18 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
----------------------------------------------------------
SAMPLE MEAN CHANGE 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 8. 9. 10. 11. 11. 12. 13.
SST POTENTIAL 0. 0. 0. 1. 4. 9. 15. 20. 25. 28. 30. 32.
VERTICAL SHEAR 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 7. 7. 7. 7. 7. 6. 8.
PERSISTENCE 0. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. 0. 0.
200/250 MB TEMP. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 2. 2.
THETA_E EXCESS 0. -1. -1. -1. -2. -3. -4. -6. -7. -9. -9. -10.
700-500 MB RH 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. -1. -1.
GFS VORTEX TENDENCY 0. 0. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -2. -2. -2. -2. -2.
850 MB ENV VORTICITY 0. 1. 1. 1. 2. 2. 2. 3. 2. 2. 2. 2.
200 MB DIVERGENCE 0. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 7. 8. 9. 9. 9. 8.
ZONAL STORM MOTION 0. 0. 1. 1. 1. 2. 2. 2. 3. 3. 3. 4.
STEERING LEVEL PRES 0. 0. 1. 1. 1. 2. 2. 2. 3. 2. 2. 2.
DAYS FROM CLIM. PEAK 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. 1. 2. 2. 2. 2. 2. 2.
----------------------------------------------------------
SUB-TOTAL CHANGE 2. 5. 8. 12. 21. 30. 40. 47. 52. 54. 55. 58.

SATELLITE ADJUSTMENTS ----------------------------------------------------------
MEAN ADJUSTMENT 0. 0. 0. 0. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -2.
GOES IR STD DEV 1. 1. 2. 2. 2. 2. 1. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0.
GOES IR PIXEL COUNT 0. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. 0. 0. 1. 1. 1. 0.
OCEAN HEAT CONTENT 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1.
----------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL ADJUSTMENT 0. 1. 1. 1. 1. 0. 0. -1. -2. -2. -2. -3.
----------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL CHANGE (KT) 2. 6. 9. 13. 21. 31. 40. 46. 50. 52. 53. 55.

** 2007 ATLANTIC RAPID INTENSITY INDEX AL912007 INVEST 09/09/07 12 UTC **
( 25 KT OR MORE MAX WIND INCREASE IN NEXT 24 HR)

12 HR PERSISTENCE (KT): 0.0 Range:-45.0 to 30.0 Scaled/Wgted Val: 0.6/ 0.9
850-200 MB SHEAR (KT) : 8.8 Range: 35.1 to 3.2 Scaled/Wgted Val: 0.8/ 0.6
D200 (10**7s-1) : 80.4 Range:-20.0 to 149.0 Scaled/Wgted Val: 0.6/ 0.5
POT = MPI-VMAX (KT) : 108.6 Range: 8.1 to 130.7 Scaled/Wgted Val: 0.8/ 1.6
850-700 MB REL HUM (%): 76.4 Range: 57.0 to 88.0 Scaled/Wgted Val: 0.6/ 0.2
% area w/pixels <-30 C: 34.0 Range: 17.0 to 100.0 Scaled/Wgted Val: 0.2/ 0.1
STD DEV OF IR BR TEMP : 26.4 Range: 37.5 to 5.3 Scaled/Wgted Val: 0.3/ 0.3

Scaled RI index= 4.0 Prob of RI= 17% is 1.4 times the sample mean(12%)
Discrim RI index= 4.3 Prob of RI= 32% is 2.6 times the sample mean(12%)

## ANNULAR HURRICANE INDEX (AHI) AL912007 INVEST 09/09/07 12 UTC ##
## STORM NOT ANNULAR, SCREENING STEP FAILED, NPASS=4 NFAIL=3 ##
## AHI= 0 (AHI OF 100 IS BEST FIT TO ANN. STRUC., 1 IS MARGINAL, 0 IS NOT ANNULAR) ##
## ANNULAR INDEX RAN NORMALLY
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 125 guests