Back to the Moon and on to Mars

Discuss Astronomy, Geology and other related subjects like Earthquakes, Volcanos, Tsunami's and other Natural events around the world.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 63
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Back to the Moon and on to Mars

#1 Postby x-y-no » Mon Apr 07, 2008 12:26 pm

Did anyone else watch last night's 60 minutes segment on progress towards a manned return to the Moon and eventually a manned mission to Mars?

Overall, I thought it was good, although I wish they would have spent some time on the scientific value of a permanent base on the Moon. The Moon is far superior to orbit as a site for both visual and radio telescopes (especially radio, since the far side of the Moon is completely free of man-made radio signals.)

Don't get me wrong - I'd like to see an eventual mission to Mars as well, but the Moon is much more than just a stepping stone on that path.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#2 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Apr 07, 2008 12:31 pm

I think we should get established in the Moon before going to colonize other celestial objects. The Moon should be the base to everything. We can construct all spacecrafts there and it takes very little effort to get them moving toward their targets.
0 likes   

Cryomaniac
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1289
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:26 pm
Location: Newark, Nottinghamshire, UK
Contact:

Re:

#3 Postby Cryomaniac » Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:25 am

HURAKAN wrote:I think we should get established in the Moon before going to colonize other celestial objects. The Moon should be the base to everything. We can construct all spacecrafts there and it takes very little effort to get them moving toward their targets.


That would be a good idea. I'm all for assembling space craft in orbit, because of that fact.
0 likes   

User avatar
Cyclenall
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6627
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

#4 Postby Cyclenall » Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:34 pm

I saw a really good one on CBC Newsworld in Canada about future man trips to Mars. The ending was really quite something, it explained how to make it livable in the future (terraforming).

On that program, it explained why it would cost more to build bases on the moon to then go to Mars. They said it was just better to do it from Earth.
0 likes   

User avatar
gigabite
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 916
Age: 70
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 4:09 pm
Location: Naples, Florida

#5 Postby gigabite » Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:19 pm

First I think that the power satellite should be deployed and the power beamed to Mars, because the first step to colonization is power. If you are going to mine the asteroid belt you need power besides the power satellite can be placed at L1, (a Lagrangian point outside the moons atmosphere between the earth and sun) acting as a de facto parasol limiting global warming.

Of course a small amount of power could be peeled off and used to pay off the space program, the national debt, and every student loan on the planet.




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian_point
0 likes   

User avatar
Matt-hurricanewatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11649
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Portland,OR
Contact:

Re: Back to the Moon and on to Mars

#6 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Fri Apr 11, 2008 1:11 am

I don't believe we will have a base on the moon intill 2050. The politics sucks for it right now. Hell, I don't believe we will even land on the moon intill 2020 or after.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: Back to the Moon and on to Mars

#7 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:26 pm

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:I don't believe we will have a base on the moon intill 2050. The politics sucks for it right now. Hell, I don't believe we will even land on the moon intill 2020 or after.


I must agree based on the current economical situation.
0 likes   

User avatar
Matt-hurricanewatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11649
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Portland,OR
Contact:

Re: Back to the Moon and on to Mars

#8 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:54 pm

I believe China will land on the moon first. :wink:
0 likes   


Return to “Astronomy and Geology”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 100 guests