ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#10381 Postby KWT » Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:59 am

Galveston at 16.7, thats very close to the height of the sea wall, if the track is a little left of the forecast then the surge will top the sea wall.

The main surge however is a little to the east which looks like topping 20-25ft generally.
0 likes   

physicx07
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 215
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 7:46 am
Location: Miami

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10382 Postby physicx07 » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:01 am

Portastorm wrote:Doesn't surprise me at all to see the landfall spot nudged a bit left at the 5 am advisory. Several of us last night saw the trough out in the Great Basin still digging and looking less deep as progged. Latest CIMSS steering flow suggests the same. Perhaps another nudge left or two is in store?

Many here have said when you're within 24 hours of landfall, it's time to throw out the TC models and use globals and real-time (radar, satellite). Are we there yet? Is that even a credible suggestion? I dunno.


And recon too not to mention tide gauges. I think we we're just about in real-time mode IMHO.
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10383 Postby Portastorm » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:06 am

physicx07 wrote:
Portastorm wrote:Doesn't surprise me at all to see the landfall spot nudged a bit left at the 5 am advisory. Several of us last night saw the trough out in the Great Basin still digging and looking less deep as progged. Latest CIMSS steering flow suggests the same. Perhaps another nudge left or two is in store?

Many here have said when you're within 24 hours of landfall, it's time to throw out the TC models and use globals and real-time (radar, satellite). Are we there yet? Is that even a credible suggestion? I dunno.


And recon too not to mention tide gauges. I think we we're just about in real-time mode IMHO.


Yeah, good point there! This is going to be real interesting. The GFS is further left/west than the Euro not only on landfall but also as the storm moves inland. Obviously this will have huge implications. Going to be interesting to see which one nails it, if any.
0 likes   

User avatar
JtSmarts
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1437
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 1:29 pm
Location: Columbia, South Carolina

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10384 Postby JtSmarts » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:06 am

Wow, how far is that 91kt reading from the center, Hurakan?
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10385 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:11 am

JtSmarts wrote:Wow, how far is that 91kt reading from the center, Hurakan?


Image

To the NW of the center.
0 likes   

User avatar
AZRainman
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 146
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 12:48 pm
Location: Sonoran Desert
Contact:

Re:

#10386 Postby AZRainman » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:11 am

KWT wrote:Galveston at 16.7, thats very close to the height of the sea wall, if the track is a little left of the forecast then the surge will top the sea wall.

The main surge however is a little to the east which looks like topping 20-25ft generally.


I not sure if that those maps include actual wave crests or that's just the swell.

My guess is that it doesn't include wave crest height, so they should be slopping over the top quite a bit.
Last edited by AZRainman on Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#10387 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:12 am

Image

Immense Ike.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10388 Postby KWT » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:13 am

physicx07 wrote:
And recon too not to mention tide gauges. I think we we're just about in real-time mode IMHO.


Yeah we are, you can see the outer bands on radar plus the tide is already starting to increase in front of Ike in the Texas region and increasing very rapidly now in LA it seems.

Surge should rapidly increase in the Galveston Bay after 21z.
0 likes   

Txdivermom
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:49 am

Re:

#10389 Postby Txdivermom » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:14 am

physicx07 wrote:KHOU feed showing water climbing up close to the streets on the west end of GLS not protected by the seawall. This is going to be scary when it gets even closer.


I think it is very likely there will be deaths if folks stay in Galveston. Water is already splashing over the seawall from waves and this is NOTHING. West Beach...areas like Jamaica Beach and Sea Isle are already flooding. They said the road out from Sea Isle is only one lane in some places. :eek: If people don't leave...they will die. They believe west beach is pretty much evacuated.

This really looks scary to me. Not looking forward to it.
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re:

#10390 Postby Thunder44 » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:14 am

HURAKAN wrote:Image

Station 42361 - Auger - Garden Banks 426
09 12 5:15 am NNE 91.3 - - - - - 28.83 - 80.6 - 75.2

91 knots! :eek:


That buoy is now reporting 95kts. The anenometer there is 122m high though.

http://ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42361
0 likes   

User avatar
dizzyfish
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1519
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 7:56 am
Location: New Port Richey, FL

Re: IKE / Obs / Preparations / Web Cams / Texas / SW Louisiana

#10391 Postby dizzyfish » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:15 am

I heard on the TV this morning that they have told residents in Houston to shelter in place and not evacuate. Can this be correct???
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#10392 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:15 am

Image

Station 42361 - Auger - Garden Banks 426
Anemometer height: 122 m above site elevation
95.2 knots :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: Re:

#10393 Postby KWT » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:16 am

AZRainman wrote:
I not sure if that those maps include actual wave crests or that's just the swell.

My guess is that it doesn't include wave crest height, so they should be slopping over the top quit a bit.


Of course, the best case for Galveston has to be Ike taking a right wobble before landfall, surge is around 12ft on the western side. Still huge and its still going to cause huge amount of damage to properties near the coast and on the coast on the western side.
0 likes   

User avatar
drezee
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3664
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 12:49 pm
Location: FL

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10394 Postby drezee » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:16 am

95.2kts = 109.8608 mph sustained wind even at 400ft is impressive that far from the center
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re:

#10395 Postby KWT » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:17 am

HURAKAN wrote:Image

Station 42361 - Auger - Garden Banks 426
Anemometer height: 122 m above site elevation
95.2 knots :eek:


Pretty decent winds there despite the elevation, will be interesting to see how much that will increase, what quadrant is that in?
0 likes   

wjs3
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 633
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 7:57 am

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10396 Postby wjs3 » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:17 am

Just a point on that Marine ob of 90+ kts--yes it's impressive, but it needs to be reduced. It's taken at 122 meters--not the meteorological standard of 10M. Here's description from NDBC:

Air temp height: 37 m above site elevation
Anemometer height: 122 m above site elevation
Barometer elevation: 37 m above mean sea level
Water depth: 872 m

edit: Looks like drezee beat me to this point. Sorry!
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#10397 Postby KWT » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:18 am

wjs3, of course but its still not going to be far off cat-2 status despite being a decent way away from the center.
0 likes   

superfly

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10398 Postby superfly » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:19 am

drezee wrote:95.2kts = 109.8608 mph sustained wind even at 400ft is impressive that far from the center


The highest winds are away from the center.
0 likes   

Deputy Van Halen
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 104
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 12:00 am
Location: Texas City, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10399 Postby Deputy Van Halen » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:20 am

jabber wrote:IKE almost looks subtropical... especially with all the winds far from the center. I know hes not its just interseting


You stole my thunder. I was going to say the same thing. There should be a name for this kind of storm. Frances '04 was a similar kind of storm--only cat2 at landfall, but very wide wind swaths.
0 likes   

wjs3
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 633
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 7:57 am

Re:

#10400 Postby wjs3 » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:21 am

KWT wrote:wjs3, of course but its still not going to be far off cat-2 status despite being a decent way away from the center.



Yes, it's an impressive ob. And yes, it's a long way from the center. What an unusual storm.

You mean cat 3, right? 95/96 kts=cat 2/3 border.

WJS3
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests