ATL GUSTAV: Tropical Depression - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Derek Ortt

#1121 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:03 am

looks like the circ is still in the mid levels

do NOT discount a SF threat from this one. This very well could threaten the area. It should move NW for a couple of more days until it moves past the weakness in the ridge
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

Re: ATL: Invest 94L=SSD Dvorak T Numbers 2.5/2.5

#1122 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:06 am

Unless the system is moving slowly or is a moderate tropical storm. I would pay little atention to quickscat. I think it did this to a cat5 hurricane to a few years ago.

There is a difference between this and fay. That is the lower level clouds at very low levels are showing a closed LLC. While Fay had very little of that, more at the mid levels.
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re: ATL: Invest 94L=SSD Dvorak T Numbers 2.5/2.5

#1123 Postby Thunder44 » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:09 am

SouthFloridaWx, the timestamp on the bottom of the QS image is 10:39 UTC. Today's date is also on top.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#1124 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:12 am

the forward speed does not make it hard for QS to pick up a circ

what could make it hard is if it is a small circulation
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re: ATL: Invest 94L in Central Caribbean Sea

#1125 Postby Thunder44 » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:15 am

cheezyWXguy wrote:
Thunder44 wrote:
sevenleft wrote:LLC? What LLC?
Image


This will probably keep TPC from upgrading it before the plane gets there this afternoon. It might need some more time to get organized at the surface.

Nope. We saw the same thing in Bertha when it was a major. Quikscat is a satellite, and sometimes cannot see all the way to the surface when rain is extremely heavy. Therefore, this and Bertha were portrayed as open waves, even though Bertha did and this one likely does have a llc.


This isn't at the stage of development that Bertha was at the time. I haven't looked at surface obs or studied visible imagery yet. So I haven't really made my own determination yet. But I think TPC will wait knowing how they have acted in the past. Then again, they have been less predictable this year. :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1126 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:15 am

Lower Levels:
Image

Upper Levels:
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145412
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: Invest 94L=SSD Dvorak T Numbers 2.5/2.5

#1127 Postby cycloneye » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:15 am

what could make it hard is if it is a small circulation


And that is what recon will find out this afternoon to see if there is a tiny closed LLC or not.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

Re: ATL: Invest 94L=SSD Dvorak T Numbers 2.5/2.5

#1128 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:16 am

There was reports out of south America of a west wind to its south. I would say wait intil recon comes in. This has 10 times the inflow as fay ever had before DR. IN that is a sign of a developing closed LLC.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22980
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#1129 Postby wxman57 » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:19 am

Derek Ortt wrote:the forward speed does not make it hard for QS to pick up a circ

what could make it hard is if it is a small circulation


Or if the LLC is obscured by rain. QS can't see well through rain.

Just looking at it this morning, it does appear to be located west of all the 06Z model guidance but its forward speed is slower than yesterday and it's on more of a WNW track toward Jamaica to western Haiti. That western track toward the Yucatan is looking less likely. Good for the NW Gulf, bad for Florida, possibly. Latest GFDL has a very Fay-like track across Cuba to near the Keys by Saturday then northward. No way I'm very confident in a track at this point. It could even turn north across eastern Cuba or Haiti and head out to sea.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1130 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:19 am

Image

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1131 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:21 am

invest_RENUMBER_al942008_al072008.ren
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145412
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: Invest 94L in Central Caribbean Sea

#1132 Postby cycloneye » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:22 am

:uarrow: We have TD 7.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

Re:

#1133 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:22 am

HURAKAN wrote:invest_RENUMBER_al942008_al072008.ren



07L=nhc going for it!
0 likes   

User avatar
bvigal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2276
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 8:49 am
Location: British Virgin Islands
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 94L in Central Caribbean Sea

#1134 Postby bvigal » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:24 am

This is the best-looking nothing I've ever seen. As little as 2 years ago, this would have been called a TD late last night or early this morning, and few would have criticized the decision. Now the U.S. media hype and hysteria is a deciding factor in declaring storms, as NHC needs to postpone as long as possible printing a storm track and cone. I'm so sick of the U.S. media I could barf! They really run the country now, them and the lawyers.
edit: Well I see they've decided it's a TD, good!
0 likes   

User avatar
CourierPR
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1335
Age: 71
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Pompano Beach, Florida

Re: 94L invest_RENUMBER_al942008_al072008.ren=TD7 at 11 AM

#1135 Postby CourierPR » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:25 am

Might we see a 1964 Hurricane Cleo redux?
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#1136 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:25 am

not in the atcf guidance file yet... just ran a c-shells cript to get the models and it was not there yet
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#1137 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:25 am

are we sure it wont be Gustav at 11. This likely has TS winds
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re:

#1138 Postby gatorcane » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:27 am

Derek Ortt wrote:are we sure it wont be Gustav at 11. This likely has TS winds


I think we have Gustav at 11. If not by 11 definitely by 5EST.

Impressive to say the least:
Image
Last edited by gatorcane on Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#1139 Postby deltadog03 » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:27 am

Well, one thing that the QS did show were some 40kt wind barbs..That were not contaminated by rain....I would say we might have Gustav...
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: 94L invest_RENUMBER_al942008_al072008.ren=TD7 at 11 AM

#1140 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:27 am

Station MGIP4 - 9759110 - Magueyes Islands, PR
17.972 N 67.047 W (17°58'18" N 67°2'48" W)

Code: Select all

MM    DD    TIME
(ADT)         WDIR    WSPD
kts    GST
kts    WVHT
ft    DPD
sec    APD
sec    MWD    PRES
in    PTDY
in    ATMP
°F    WTMP
°F    DEWP
°F    SAL
psu    VIS
mi    TIDE
ft
08   25   9:48 am        SSW   4.1   7.0   -   -   -   -   29.91   -   81.0   85.5   -   -   -   -
08   25   9:42 am        SW   5.1   8.9   -   -   -   -   29.90   -   80.4   85.5   -   -   -   -
08   25   9:36 am        SW   2.9   6.0   -   -   -   -   29.90   -   80.6   85.5   -   -   -   -
08   25   9:30 am        SSW   1.9   5.1   -   -   -   -   29.89   -   80.4   85.5   -   -   -   -
08   25   9:24 am        SSW   1.9   5.1   -   -   -   -   29.89   -   80.2   85.5   -   -   -   -
08   25   9:18 am        SW   2.9   5.1   -   -   -   -   29.89   -   80.2   85.5   -   -   -   -
08   25   9:12 am        SW   1.0   6.0   -   -   -   -   29.89   -   80.4   85.5   -   -   -   -
08   25   9:06 am        SSW   2.9   6.0   -   -   -   -   29.89   -   80.1   85.5   -   -   -   -
08   25   8:54 am        SW   1.9   6.0   -   -   -   -   29.89   -   80.2   85.5   -   -   -   -
08   25   8:48 am        SW   1.9   6.0   -   -   -   -   29.89   -   80.1   85.5   -   -   -   -
08   25   8:42 am        SW   4.1   8.9   -   -   -   -   29.89   -   80.1   85.5   -   -   -   -
08   25   8:36 am        SW   4.1   7.0   -   -   -   -   29.89   -   80.2   85.5   -   -   -   -
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests