ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
artist
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9792
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: West Palm

Re: ATL Hurricane IKE - Discussion

#1161 Postby artist » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:05 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
wxman57 wrote:03Z NHC track had day 4 point exactly the same (22.5N/72W) and day 4 point nudged right from 23.5N/76W to 24N/75.5W. Slower and a slight nudge right as expected.

Bed time!



Yep...that was very predictable.


question for you or any of the mets here (and thanks for answering our questions)

What was the setup that drove Andrew into s Florida?
0 likes   

User avatar
CourierPR
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1335
Age: 71
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Pompano Beach, Florida

Re:

#1162 Postby CourierPR » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:07 pm

gatorcane wrote:I'm becoming more confident that AFM is right...they may just keep nudging it north each advisory until finally Florida is in the clear...



The models might also swing back west. The certainty of some of the statements made tonight is astounding with regard to Ike's future track.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#1163 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:10 pm

How strong will Ike get I wonder?
0 likes   

User avatar
Jevo
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1729
Age: 47
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:45 pm
Location: The Flemish Cap
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion

#1164 Postby Jevo » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:10 pm

You do have to admire the NHC's "Path of least regret" methodology. It is to put everyone at a heightened sense of awareness.. as we have already seen from our SC/NC friends this evening. I do agree it is a very responsible thing to do especially with a storm as dangers as Ike is at this time.

A senior hurricane specialist that I will not name for obvious reasons said something to me that I found very amusing during the '07 FLGHC "Any model guidance 4+ days out is like throwing darts blind-folded" Sure you know which direction it is going, but its accuracy leaves something to be desired. He followed up with "Why do you think we are sticking with the 3 day cone and publishing the 5 day as experimental"

It is always in the discussion language as well.. Such as tonight

THE
LINGERING QUESTION THAT REMAINS AT THE LONGER RANGE IS WHEN IKE
WILL MOVE AROUND THE WESTERN PERIPHERY OF THE RIDGE. THE
MODEL SPREAD REMAINS QUITE LARGE AT DAYS 4 AND 5


I would like to see them put up a G-IV and start sampeling the upper levels tomorrow... As they intended I think that everyone from the GOM to Ne needs to pay attention
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL Hurricane IKE - Discussion

#1165 Postby Air Force Met » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:11 pm

artist wrote: question for you or any of the mets here (and thanks for answering our questions)

What was the setup that drove Andrew into s Florida?


A 596 DM high was sitting off the coasts of NC/VA and ridging into SC/GA...and into the NE GoM.

I should have stated...a 596DM high at 500MB.
Last edited by Air Force Met on Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Windtalker1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 523
Age: 37
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:00 am
Location: Mesa, Arizona

Re: ATL Hurricane IKE - Discussion

#1166 Postby Windtalker1 » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:11 pm

artist wrote:
Air Force Met wrote:
wxman57 wrote:03Z NHC track had day 4 point exactly the same (22.5N/72W) and day 4 point nudged right from 23.5N/76W to 24N/75.5W. Slower and a slight nudge right as expected.

Bed time!



Yep...that was very predictable.


question for you or any of the mets here (and thanks for answering our questions)

What was the setup that drove Andrew into s Florida?


An upper low east of Bermuda steered Andrew more to the north and weakened the
system. On the 21st, the southern extent of the upper trough pinched off into a new
upper low to Andrew's southwest, creating a much more favorable upper level
environment. This development, in combination with a surface high near the southeast
coast of the United States, turned Andrew more to the west and rapid strengthening
ensued. In 42 hours, Andrew had strengthen from essentially a strong tropical wave
northeast of the Caribbean to a major hurricane as it continued to barrel westward
towards Florida.

(sorry I'm not a Met)
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22980
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Re:

#1167 Postby wxman57 » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:12 pm

CourierPR wrote:
gatorcane wrote:I'm becoming more confident that AFM is right...they may just keep nudging it north each advisory until finally Florida is in the clear...



The models might also swing back west. The certainty of some of the statements made tonight is astounding with regard to Ike's future track.


Yes, models could trend back west. Who is certain of Ike's track? I haven't seen any such statements. Seeing trends in model guidance is not a statement of certainty in a track, it's simply an observation.
0 likes   

User avatar
artist
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9792
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: West Palm

#1168 Postby artist » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:14 pm

thanks AirForce met and windtalker for your answers.
0 likes   

cpdaman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:44 am
Location: SPB county (gulf stream)

Re: Re:

#1169 Postby cpdaman » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:15 pm

wxman57 wrote:
CourierPR wrote:
gatorcane wrote:I'm becoming more confident that AFM is right...they may just keep nudging it north each advisory until finally Florida is in the clear...



The models might also swing back west. The certainty of some of the statements made tonight is astounding with regard to Ike's future track.


Yes, models could trend back west. Who is certain of Ike's track? I haven't seen any such statements. Seeing trends in model guidance is not a statement of certainty in a track, it's simply an observation.


wxman not to pester you

but i heard you mention the carolina's for ike in the hanna thread

i very much respect your insights track wise

i was not sure if you were saying they need to watch it or wether you are confident it will go there
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20011
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion

#1170 Postby tolakram » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:15 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Windtalker1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 523
Age: 37
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:00 am
Location: Mesa, Arizona

Re:

#1171 Postby Windtalker1 » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:15 pm

artist wrote:thanks AirForce met and windtalker for your answers.


Your welcome. Found the answer on Google :)
0 likes   

User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

Fort Lauderdale Hurricane 1947-same time of year. good analo

#1172 Postby Vortex » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:17 pm

Last edited by Vortex on Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: Re:

#1173 Postby Air Force Met » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:18 pm

CourierPR wrote:
gatorcane wrote:I'm becoming more confident that AFM is right...they may just keep nudging it north each advisory until finally Florida is in the clear...



The models might also swing back west. The certainty of some of the statements made tonight is astounding with regard to Ike's future track.


Can you point to any posts which stated "this will" do this...or "this will not" hit here or there?

I haven't seen them. I haven't seen any "certain" statements...just observations (as Chris said) on what it looks like now.

More confident does not mean certain. I don't think anyone is that foolish when it comes to tracks and hurricanes.
0 likes   

User avatar
Jevo
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1729
Age: 47
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:45 pm
Location: The Flemish Cap
Contact:

Re: Re:

#1174 Postby Jevo » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:20 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
CourierPR wrote:
gatorcane wrote:I'm becoming more confident that AFM is right...they may just keep nudging it north each advisory until finally Florida is in the clear...



The models might also swing back west. The certainty of some of the statements made tonight is astounding with regard to Ike's future track.


Can you point to any posts which stated "this will" do this...or "this will not" hit here or there?

I haven't seen them. I haven't seen any "certain" statements...just observations (as Chris said) on what it looks like now.

More confident does not mean certain. I don't think anyone is that foolish when it comes to tracks and hurricanes.


Here's some spaghetti for ya
Image

Also looks like Gonzo (The G4) is going up today... that may get some better info for Ike's model runs as well
FLIGHT TWO -- NOAA 49
A. 05/0000Z
B. NOAA9 1008A HANNA
C. 04/1730Z
D. NA
E. NA
F. 41,000 TO 45,000 FT
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: Re:

#1175 Postby Air Force Met » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:21 pm

Windtalker1 wrote:
artist wrote:thanks AirForce met and windtalker for your answers.


Your welcome. Found the answer on Google :)


Was forecasting Andrew from Ft Hood, TX. So...remembered :)

Worked 54 hrs straight. I was younger then.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5313
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion

#1176 Postby Ptarmigan » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:21 pm

Wow! Ike is now a Category 4 hurricane. I am not surprised about it.
Last edited by Ptarmigan on Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

foladar
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion

#1177 Postby foladar » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:21 pm

question .. when would recon go into Ike? not too familar with that aspect. and when would next models be done?
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion

#1178 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:22 pm

Ptarmigan wrote:Wow! Ike is not a Category 4 hurricane. I am not surprised about it.


Not a Category 4 - what do you think it is? Category 5?
0 likes   

User avatar
BigA
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:56 pm

Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion

#1179 Postby BigA » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:22 pm

Any idea on how much the shear will knock this thing down during the next three days?
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion

#1180 Postby Bocadude85 » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:24 pm

so it seems i will be safe here..... thats good news was starting to get nervous
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests