ATL IKE: Models Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
tpr1967
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 185
Age: 58
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2003 8:37 pm
Location: Palmetto,FL

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1261 Postby tpr1967 » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:07 pm

A 597 dm ridge near bermuda. Check for yourselves. Seems pretty strong to me.

http://weather.uwyo.edu/cgi-bin/soundin ... STNM=78016
0 likes   

User avatar
artist
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9792
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: West Palm

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1262 Postby artist » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:09 pm

tpr1967 wrote:A 597 dm ridge near bermuda. Check for yourselves. Seems pretty strong to me.

http://weather.uwyo.edu/cgi-bin/soundin ... STNM=78016

can you interpret that for me please! :cheesy:
0 likes   

User avatar
tpr1967
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 185
Age: 58
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2003 8:37 pm
Location: Palmetto,FL

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1263 Postby tpr1967 » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:11 pm

Well the 18z run of the GFS only shows 594 at 0000Z. So it is under estimating the 500mb ridge.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re:

#1264 Postby x-y-no » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:11 pm

bucman1 wrote:are there other models juming on boards with the GFS deep layer trough solution?


Well, troughs will always come along eventually. But as far as I'm aware, it's only the GFS that traps Ike long enough to have that turn him into the western coast of the Florida peninsula. I wouldn't fret much about that possibility yet.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1265 Postby x-y-no » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:15 pm

tpr1967 wrote:A 597 dm ridge near bermuda. Check for yourselves. Seems pretty strong to me.

http://weather.uwyo.edu/cgi-bin/soundin ... STNM=78016



I don't think there's much debate about there being a very strong ridge. The issue is whether it's tilted in front of Ike strongly enough to steer him as far south as a number of the models say - I don't think it looks like that. I don't see Ike doing more than grazing the northern coast of Cuba.
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#1266 Postby HouTXmetro » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:17 pm

WSW Motion appears to have started.

viewtopic.php?f=59&t=102848&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=1260
0 likes   

User avatar
amawea
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 385
Age: 73
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 3:36 pm
Location: Horseshoe Bend, Ar. but from Baytown, Tx

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1267 Postby amawea » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:19 pm

Thanks for the link to an excellent site Timeflow.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1268 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:20 pm

Water vapor loop

The trough to the Northeast and ridge on top seem to be following Ike. Note also the protective Wsterlies remain well established over all but extreme South Texas.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10147
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1269 Postby Blown Away » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:22 pm

Ed Mahmoud wrote:Water vapor loop

The trough to the Northeast and ridge on top seem to be following Ike. Note also the protective Wsterlies remain well established over all but extreme South Texas.


Ed do you think the hurricane season is pretty much over with for Texas? :D
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22980
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1270 Postby wxman57 » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:22 pm

amawea wrote:Thanks for the link to an excellent site Timeflow.


I notice their error cone is incorrect, like the cones on S2K. The error cone is actually a series of circles representing the 66.6% 5-year error at each forecast point. The day 5 error is a circle about 750 miles across. So the end point of the cone is a circle, it's not a flat line. The error can be nearly 400 miles ahead of the 5-day point, too.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10147
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1271 Postby Blown Away » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:26 pm

wxman57 wrote:
amawea wrote:Thanks for the link to an excellent site Timeflow.


I notice their error cone is incorrect, like the cones on S2K. The error cone is actually a series of circles representing the 66.6% 5-year error at each forecast point. The day 5 error is a circle about 750 miles across. So the end point of the cone is a circle, it's not a flat line. The error can be nearly 400 miles ahead of the 5-day point, too.


Wxman57, would you say at this point the probability of Ike landfalling on Florida's east coast from Homestead N is very low?
0 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6367
Age: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1272 Postby boca » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:34 pm

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.[/quote]

I'm starting to think that S FL mainland will be spared from Ike.That high is too strong for Ike to turn NW south of Florida but it will make it into the GOM and be a NGOM problem eventually.
0 likes   

User avatar
MississippiHurricane
ChatStaff
ChatStaff
Posts: 648
Age: 40
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 12:20 am
Location: Hanover, Maryland
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1273 Postby MississippiHurricane » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:35 pm

How can you be so sure its headed for Texas? IMO its still way to early to call that yet. NO ONE is out of the woods yet and we all know how fast things DO change. Everyone just needs to watch this over the next few days and just make sure you have all of your supplies ready to go just in case.
0 likes   

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

#1274 Postby Evil Jeremy » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:35 pm

Burn1, I am going to tell you the same thing that everyone is being told tonight. No one is safe yet. No one is in the clear. Such statments are misleading.
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1275 Postby Stratosphere747 » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:36 pm

Could be a decent shift to the S and W at 10.

Image
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1276 Postby SouthFLTropics » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:36 pm

All this tracking of Fay, Gustav, Hanna, and now Ike has worn me out. I guess it has caught up to me because now I'm sick :sick: ...I guess I should get some rest tonight and let the model and wobble watching go to others. Hopefully Ike will continue to go South under us and I won't have to worry about getting preps ready on Sunday/Monday.

SFT
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1277 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:40 pm

MississippiHurricane wrote:How can you be so sure its headed for Texas? IMO its still way to early to call that yet. NO ONE is out of the woods yet and we all know how fast things DO change. Everyone just needs to watch this over the next few days and just make sure you have all of your supplies ready to go just in case.



I did not call for this to come anywhere near Texas.
0 likes   

User avatar
thetruesms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 844
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Tallahasee, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1278 Postby thetruesms » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:40 pm

tpr1967 wrote:Well the 18z run of the GFS only shows 594 at 0000Z. So it is under estimating the 500mb ridge.
Bermuda is well within the 594 dm isopleth, so I would find it more likely that it is higher than 594 dm. All I can tell for sure is that it there is not a large enough area of 600 dm heights to warrant drawing a 600 isopleth. Without seeing the value of the grid point nearest Bermuda, it may very well have predicted a 597 dm height. In the end, a 3 dm underestimation is still only on the order of 10^-3, and is likely negligible.
0 likes   

User avatar
zeusman
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: DFW TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1279 Postby zeusman » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:41 pm

Ed Mahmoud wrote:Water vapor loop

The trough to the Northeast and ridge on top seem to be following Ike. Note also the protective Wsterlies remain well established over all but extreme South Texas.



Protective westerlies?? Protecting where from what?

You can note from this WV loop that ridge axis is beginning a tilt from southwest to northeast orientation (not due north and south)
0 likes   

User avatar
haml8
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 188
Age: 49
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: Katy, Texas
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1280 Postby haml8 » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:42 pm

Burn1 wrote:Me say a Galveston landing with ridging builing back up over midwest.....

Silence!!!!! We'll have none of that prognosticating here!! :) j/k
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests