ATL IKE: Models Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: Re:

#1321 Postby gatorcane » Fri Sep 05, 2008 10:59 pm

ROCK wrote:
gatorcane wrote::uarrow:

Ike traversing the high terrain of Cuba and getting ripped apart at 66 hours.



that is a good thing.... :D


it may be an open wave by the time it emerges on this run...(kidding of course)
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1322 Postby ROCK » Fri Sep 05, 2008 10:59 pm

Chigger_Lopez wrote:If Ike continues SW for that long or longer, would that not give it time to be picked up by a possible trough? Just a bad thought.



yes....look at the 500mb heights.....strong ridging....
0 likes   

Chigger_Lopez
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 10:11 pm
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1323 Postby Chigger_Lopez » Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:00 pm

otowntiger wrote:Is there a chance that once he gets in the GOM that he hook nne or ne due to the coming down? I see a couple of the models possibly less reiable ones showing some odd hooking at the end of their runs. Are they seeing something close to feasible?


I was thinking the exact same thing. Would that not give the storm more time to find the weakness that Airforce and Wxman were talking about last night. Albeit west of the peninsula and much further South. . . Just thinking out loud
0 likes   

Sihara
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 137
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1324 Postby Sihara » Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:00 pm

I was looking at the GFS on this site:
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfstc2.c ... =Animation

It was the 2008090518 - if I'm right about what I was looking at, it was very scary for the FL's W coast! Is this run plausible, or does a later run suggest otherwise? I guess I'm trying to find reasons not to believe what I think I saw.

Please excuse my newbie questions - I asked this once before but left out the operative words :oops: It was this: is it possible that, with Ike's WSW motion, it can get far enough south not to be pulled north by a weakness in the ridge? Does anyone have any idea - or is that highly unlikely.


Still feeling a bit ill after seeing that GFS run.
0 likes   

User avatar
Windy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1628
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 10:13 pm

Re: Re:

#1325 Postby Windy » Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:00 pm

ROCK wrote:
gatorcane wrote::uarrow:

Ike traversing the high terrain of Cuba and getting ripped apart at 66 hours.



that is a good thing.... :D


Well, maybe not so great for the Cubans.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1326 Postby gatorcane » Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:01 pm

Sihara wrote:I was looking at the GFS on this site:
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfstc2.c ... =Animation

It was the 2008090518 - if I'm right about what I was looking at, it was very scary for the FL's W coast! Is this run plausible, or does a later run suggest otherwise? I guess I'm trying to find reasons not to believe what I think I saw.

Please excuse my newbie questions - I asked this once before but left out the operative words :oops: It was this: is it possible that, with Ike's WSW motion, it can get far enough south not to be pulled north by a weakness in the ridge? Does anyone have any idea - or is that highly unlikely.


Still feeling a bit ill after seeing that GFS run.


That's the 18Z GFS, 00 GFS is way left and south of this run so maybe you'll feel better.

of course we are only out to 66 hours...
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1327 Postby ROCK » Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:02 pm

Sihara wrote:I was looking at the GFS on this site:
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfstc2.c ... =Animation

It was the 2008090518 - if I'm right about what I was looking at, it was very scary for the FL's W coast! Is this run plausible, or does a later run suggest otherwise? I guess I'm trying to find reasons not to believe what I think I saw.

Please excuse my newbie questions - I asked this once before but left out the operative words :oops: It was this: is it possible that, with Ike's WSW motion, it can get far enough south not to be pulled north by a weakness in the ridge? Does anyone have any idea - or is that highly unlikely.


Still feeling a bit ill after seeing that GFS run.



the new one is coming in 0z run.....that is the 18z....old run....that site will not update for awhile...


stick around here and get up to the minute play by play by Gatorcane on the 0z run..... :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#1328 Postby gatorcane » Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:03 pm

emerging off the Western tip of Cuba much weaker at 84 hours...I'm heading signing off.
0 likes   

jhpigott
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 570
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:09 pm
Location: North Palm Beach, Florida

#1329 Postby jhpigott » Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:04 pm

wasn't Max Mayfield on earlier today talking about the "windshield wiper" effect of these models swinging back and forth . . . looks like these "windshield wipers" are stuck in one direction -SW
0 likes   

User avatar
thetruesms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 844
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Tallahasee, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1330 Postby thetruesms » Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:05 pm

gatorcane wrote:
Sihara wrote:I was looking at the GFS on this site:
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfstc2.c ... =Animation

It was the 2008090518 - if I'm right about what I was looking at, it was very scary for the FL's W coast! Is this run plausible, or does a later run suggest otherwise? I guess I'm trying to find reasons not to believe what I think I saw.

Please excuse my newbie questions - I asked this once before but left out the operative words :oops: It was this: is it possible that, with Ike's WSW motion, it can get far enough south not to be pulled north by a weakness in the ridge? Does anyone have any idea - or is that highly unlikely.


Still feeling a bit ill after seeing that GFS run.

That's the 18Z GFS, 00 GFS is way left and south of this run so maybe you'll feel better.

of course we are only out to 66 hours...
Something that makes me feel more confident in this run is that it is lacking the random 6-12 hour N/NNE jumps that the 18Z run had . . . at least, so far.
Last edited by thetruesms on Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re:

#1331 Postby ROCK » Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:05 pm

gatorcane wrote:emerging off the Western tip of Cuba much weaker at 84 hours...I'm heading signing off.



isle of youth again...boy those poor people are getting hammered this year...they get a cat 4 with Gus and now probably cat 1 in Ike.....ugh....
0 likes   

User avatar
TreasureIslandFLGal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1581
Age: 57
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 6:16 pm
Location: Clearwater, Florida ~3 miles from the coast now. We finally moved safely off the barrier island!

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1332 Postby TreasureIslandFLGal » Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:05 pm

my concern is that even if it goes further south this run, that by the time it gets back out over water and into the gulf, whatever it saw earlier that made it take a hard right turn, will still be there and still cause the same outcome...a right turn into western florida...albeit a little later than originally pegged. was it s trough or a front? -those things usually dip pretty low in the gulf to cause such a radical turn. -or maybe the 2 ridges really join together and it gets funnelled up into a peak inbetween the two that occurs over Florida? -but the path remains blocked to further north movement?? just thinking aloud....
0 likes   

Sihara
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 137
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1333 Postby Sihara » Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:06 pm

gatorcane wrote:That's the 18Z GFS, 00 GFS is way left and south of this run so maybe you'll feel better.

of course we are only out to 66 hours...



Thank you for the welcome news, gatorcane - but yeah, I guess it's still early, things can change rapidly.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1334 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:07 pm

Maybe it'll hit Veracruz, die inland, and then the remnant moisture will come up and rain on my yard.


Maybe a hint of w-casting there. Maybe

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
tpr1967
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 185
Age: 58
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2003 8:37 pm
Location: Palmetto,FL

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1335 Postby tpr1967 » Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:09 pm

2nd shortwave over nw turned ike in 18z run see what happens here.
Ed Mahmoud wrote:Maybe it'll hit Veracruz, die inland, and then the remnant moisture will come up and rain on my yard.


Maybe a hint of w-casting there. Maybe

Image
0 likes   

Chigger_Lopez
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 10:11 pm
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1336 Postby Chigger_Lopez » Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:09 pm

TreasureIslandFLGal wrote:my concern is that even if it goes further south this run, that by the time it gets back out over water and into the gulf, whatever it saw earlier that made it take a hard right turn, will still be there and still cause the same outcome...a right turn into western florida...albeit a little later than originally pegged. was it s trough or a front? -those things usually dip pretty low in the gulf to cause such a radical turn. -or maybe the 2 ridges really join together and it gets funnelled up into a peak inbetween the two that occurs over Florida? -but the path remains blocked to further north movement?? just thinking aloud....


The thought process would make sense to me. It was always a matter of timing, but sooner or later it would want to go poleward into a weakness in the ridge. Very few thought it could pull a Felix or Dean at this time of the year. The extended SW move buys it more time to find such weakness that some thought would happen east of FL
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1337 Postby ROCK » Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:10 pm

Ed Mahmoud wrote:Maybe it'll hit Veracruz, die inland, and then the remnant moisture will come up and rain on my yard.


Maybe a hint of w-casting there. Maybe

Image



Hey Ed, I thought of you today as I mowed my yard.....popp :lol: ed opened an ice cold shiner afterwards....sure tasted good...
0 likes   

User avatar
tpr1967
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 185
Age: 58
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2003 8:37 pm
Location: Palmetto,FL

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1338 Postby tpr1967 » Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:13 pm

Surface feature at 84 hrs about the same place on west tip cuba maybe a tad south.
0 likes   

User avatar
Windy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1628
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 10:13 pm

Re: Re:

#1339 Postby Windy » Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:14 pm

Image

Quite far west at 108 hours.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1340 Postby ROCK » Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:15 pm

tpr1967 wrote:Surface feature at 84 hrs about the same place on west tip cuba maybe a tad south.


http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... 0_108l.gif

surface entering the SGOM.....
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests