ATL: Tropical Depression Dolly

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1921 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:15 pm

Now, back to 94L:

Image
0 likes   

Cryomaniac
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1289
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:26 pm
Location: Newark, Nottinghamshire, UK
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L=Special Statement=No TD at this time

#1922 Postby Cryomaniac » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:16 pm

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:I laugh at all that forecasted this season to have more then 15 storms.


That's not a sensible thing to say in July.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L=Special Statement=No TD at this time

#1923 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:17 pm

I'm sorry, but 15-20 knot shear over a strong cat4 or cat5 hurricane would cause it to weaken. No more and no less. A tropical storm like Alison, Barry 2001, Arlene where very much sheared tropical cyclones and they where tropical storms. Tell me where I'm wrong?
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#1924 Postby KWT » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:19 pm

Still looks disorganised Huakan, a little convective wart has formed near 60W but the main convection is still running ahead of where the sharp wave is at the moment. another sure sign of shear present on this system.

Pro mets are pro mets for a reason ho hum....
Last edited by KWT on Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: Re:

#1925 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:21 pm

RL3AO wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:that is so far from the truth

15.5KT of shear is about the mean shear for intensifying tropical storms. It is about the mean shear for weakening major hurricanes

Now tell me that one is not more shear resistant than the other


Question. How often is the shear being caused at the lower levels (the Caribbean now) than at the upper levels? And did your research look at just the shear (200mb-850mb?), or did it also look at if the shear was caused at the upper, middle, or lower levels? Hopefully that made sense.


I looked at 200-850 from SHIPS. I also only considered magnitude. Westerly shear can be caused by either strong low easterlies or upper westerlies. A sheared environment also occurs if there are strong upper easterlies but weak low level easterlies
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1926 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:24 pm

Image

We must get back to 94L. If you want to communicate personally with another member, use the PM. Please, it's nonesense to lose your temper on such a disturbance. Back to 94L.
0 likes   

User avatar
Innotech
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1031
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 5:32 pm
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L=Special Statement=No TD at this time

#1927 Postby Innotech » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:25 pm

personally I just think that shear is shear. Whether it is a developing depression or a full on hurricane, shear is going to affect it. I do think it would also depend on what level the shear is at because weak and strong storms are affected at varying heights, so really it could go both ways. It also depends on where on the storm the shear affects it, because shear going a certain direction can actually intensify a cyclonic rotation, if what Ive seen in the past has any merit.
0 likes   

CajunMama
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 10791
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:57 pm
Location: 30.22N, 92.05W Lafayette, LA

#1928 Postby CajunMama » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:25 pm

ok...i've got a list started of a few that will be getting suspensions without warnings if this doesn't stop. No one wants to read your bickering. Take off the board.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

Re:

#1929 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:26 pm

HURAKAN wrote:Image

We must get back to 94L. If you want to communicate personally with another member, use the PM. Please, it's nonesense to lose your temper on such a disturbance. Back to 94L.



94L looks bad at the moment. I can understand why the nhc did not upgrade it.
0 likes   

mattpetre
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 510
Age: 53
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:20 pm
Location: Missouri City,TX & Galleria
Contact:

#1930 Postby mattpetre » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:27 pm

Here's my unofficial last opinion on this subject until tomorrow morning. Invest XXXL (that blob to the west of 94L) has created a more favorable environment at this point. 94L will and has already been a TS and may be more depending on quite a few synoptic factors that we have yet to see. I really though it would just be a Mexico event, but my now created -removed- self is seeing a GOM threat that should make some Pro-Mets eat many words. We'll see... I'm just sick of a discussion board that is supposed to be about love of the weather turning into a discussion board that is more about some peoples love of themselves whether they be pro or am... I've seen this before in sports, hobby, job, and life in general. Grow up and love one another... 94L will be Cristobal / Cat 3 hurricane, if I am wrong I will not return to this board. So good riddance for you, right?
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#1931 Postby southerngale » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:27 pm

Let's drop the political references before it gets out of hand, as it usually does. There's nothing wrong with debating... just do it with respect.

cat5canes77... be careful. You're pushing it.

Btw, Matt... freedom of speech doesn't apply here. It's a private forum.


Now let's get back on topic. Future irrelevant posts may be deleted.
0 likes   

User avatar
Innotech
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1031
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 5:32 pm
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L=Special Statement=No TD at this time

#1932 Postby Innotech » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:29 pm

the storm is pretty much proving the point that shear can affect a developing storm just as much as a hurricane. I personally do think this storm will survive and develop, but it is embedded in the westerlies and will likely end up in Nicaragua. At that point I will also agree that it WILL be a danger to that country with regards to mudslides. I do not refute that.
0 likes   

User avatar
Gustywind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 12334
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:29 am
Location: Baie-Mahault, GUADELOUPE

#1933 Postby Gustywind » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:32 pm

James Wilson, Lead Meteorologist, The Weather Channel
6:01 p.m. ET 7/16/2008
Elsewhere in the Atlantic, Air Force Reserve Hurricane Hunters have investigated a disturbance nearing the Windward Islands. The westward-moving disturbance has gained a significant amount of convection the past 24 hours. However, the Hurricane Hunters were only able to find a broad area of low pressure and not a well defined center. This feature will continue to be watched closely to see if it can make it to a tropical depression. Heavy showers and squally winds can be expected across the Windward Islands through tonight into early Thursday.
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#1934 Postby southerngale » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:35 pm

Latest troll is now gone. :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
Noles2006
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 424
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:57 am
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L=Special Statement=No TD at this time

#1935 Postby Noles2006 » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:36 pm

That got ugly in a hurry... kinda like 94L.
0 likes   

mattpetre
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 510
Age: 53
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:20 pm
Location: Missouri City,TX & Galleria
Contact:

#1936 Postby mattpetre » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:36 pm

Am I gon3 now? I just typed a 100 word defense and got the "You cannot read messages in this forum message."
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re:

#1937 Postby RL3AO » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:37 pm

mattpetre wrote:Am I gon3 now? I just typed a 100 word defense and got the "You cannot read messages in this forum message."


Your still here.
0 likes   

User avatar
Innotech
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1031
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 5:32 pm
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L=Special Statement=No TD at this time

#1938 Postby Innotech » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:38 pm

I apologize if I added a bit of tension earlier with my sarcastic remark about the wind knocking over a table, but I really dont htink this storm is a threat at all AT PRESENT TIME. however that could, of course, change quickly.
0 likes   

mattpetre
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 510
Age: 53
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:20 pm
Location: Missouri City,TX & Galleria
Contact:

#1939 Postby mattpetre » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:38 pm

0 likes   

Cryomaniac
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1289
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:26 pm
Location: Newark, Nottinghamshire, UK
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L=Special Statement=No TD at this time

#1940 Postby Cryomaniac » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:40 pm

Noles2006 wrote:That got ugly in a hurry... kinda like 94L.

:lol: yeah.

The following is the opinion of Cryomaniac, and is not based on any evidence, meteorological, economic or otherwise. As such it shouldn't be used for any purpose.

I think that this could still be upgraded at 11, but it's looking less likely. If it is upgraded then it wont last all that long unless the shear lets up ahead of it, which is possible.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest