ATL HANNA: Extratropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139603
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: Invest 95L in East Atlantic

#21 Postby cycloneye » Thu Aug 21, 2008 9:26 pm

Here are both invests.

Image
0 likes   

pojo
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 8016
Age: 42
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:16 pm
Location: Houston

Re: ATL: Invest 95L in East Atlantic

#22 Postby pojo » Thu Aug 21, 2008 9:39 pm

we were looking at this system today and wondering why NHC hadn't put the INVEST 95L tag on it......

painfully obvious of either an MLC or LLC...

If we don't go for 94L there is a good chance of flying 95L or both.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10348
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: Invest 95L in East Atlantic

#23 Postby Sanibel » Thu Aug 21, 2008 9:43 pm

95L looks like it is curling up in those last frames. Longitude near 40W.

Should get a Floater on the next report.
0 likes   

User avatar
GeneratorPower
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1648
Age: 44
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:48 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

#24 Postby GeneratorPower » Thu Aug 21, 2008 9:45 pm

I think it's pretty likely NHC had their hands full with Fay and didn't want to begin tracking 95L until they *had* to. Hence the delay.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: Invest 95L in East Atlantic

#25 Postby RL3AO » Thu Aug 21, 2008 9:49 pm

pojo wrote:we were looking at this system today and wondering why NHC hadn't put the INVEST 95L tag on it......

painfully obvious of either an MLC or LLC...

If we don't go for 94L there is a good chance of flying 95L or both.


Looks like you guys will stay busy for quite a while. Of course its not a surprise as its getting into late August.
0 likes   

fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

#26 Postby fasterdisaster » Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:05 am

I'm kinda beginning to wonder if 94L and 95L are going to eat each other apart.
0 likes   

User avatar
BigA
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:56 pm

Re: ATL: Invest 95L in Central Atlantic

#27 Postby BigA » Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:08 am

I can't imagine that they would both cause the destruction of the other one, but it is certainly possible that the system that develops first (if either does) would absorb or destroy the laggard.
0 likes   

Scorpion

#28 Postby Scorpion » Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:14 am

I would think that if 94L developed then 95L would wait until it was in the Western Caribbean or Gulf to develop.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5566
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re:

#29 Postby cheezyWXguy » Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:20 am

Scorpion wrote:I would think that if 94L developed then 95L would wait until it was in the Western Caribbean or Gulf to develop.

I dont know. I think both 94 and 95 can develop. 94 has a pretty small circulation and they appear JUST far enough away from each other not to hinder each other too much. Although 94L could be the reason why theres more shear predicted for 95L than 94L
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4833
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: ATL: Invest 95L in East Atlantic

#30 Postby ConvergenceZone » Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:28 am

pojo wrote:we were looking at this system today and wondering why NHC hadn't put the INVEST 95L tag on it......

painfully obvious of either an MLC or LLC...

If we don't go for 94L there is a good chance of flying 95L or both.



I think it's so cool to have an actual hurricane hunter on the board....You guys do a fantastic job by the way, especially considering the everchanging oceanic environments that you have to fly into.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: Re:

#31 Postby RL3AO » Fri Aug 22, 2008 1:00 am

RL3AO wrote:
Cyclenall wrote:I was waiting a long time for this to be tagged 95L. It looked awesome yesterday and still looks good today. Will the NHC mention it by 2:00 am?


They tagged it as an invest so there is no reason for them not to mention it.



Shows what I know. No mention in the 2am TWO.
0 likes   

User avatar
Cyclenall
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6628
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

#32 Postby Cyclenall » Fri Aug 22, 2008 1:43 am

The NHC doesn't like this system. It has looked better than 94L for the past 38 hours and not a letter typed in the TWO.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31391
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#33 Postby KWT » Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:15 am

Wow the Atlantic has come to life, this invest is also looking pretty likely I think to develop.

All these can develop, remember 1995 when we had 4 storms all develop pretty much in a row across the mid Atlantic.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#34 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:40 am

Link to buoy 41026: http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=41026

Reporting WSW winds.
0 likes   

User avatar
gerrit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:47 pm
Location: Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: Invest 95L in Central Atlantic

#35 Postby gerrit » Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:43 am

I'm confused... 95L isn't mentioned on the NHC site nor or the Navy tropical weather site.
Who is naming invests? :?:
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31391
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#36 Postby KWT » Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:52 am

This is looking increasingly impressive now and its held this presentation for a long time now with deep convection, think the chances are this one develops into a system sometime within the next 48hrs.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139603
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: Invest 95L in Central Atlantic

#37 Postby cycloneye » Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:54 am

gerrit wrote:I'm confused... 95L isn't mentioned on the NHC site nor or the Navy tropical weather site.
Who is naming invests? :?:


Maybe a computer malfunction at NRL? Anyway,from ATCF is where all invests are activated and deactivated,all by automated computers.Here is the site from that. By the way NRL still has Isselle there after days of last advisory.

http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/atcf_web/index.html
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3297
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

Re:

#38 Postby fci » Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:59 am

GeneratorPower wrote:I think it's pretty likely NHC had their hands full with Fay and didn't want to begin tracking 95L until they *had* to. Hence the delay.


This issue comes up almost every time there is a named storm and an invest.

I just don't subscribe to the belief that the attention span at the NHC does not allow for multiple systems to be observed and forecasted at once.

I respectfully disagree with that contention.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31391
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#39 Postby KWT » Fri Aug 22, 2008 6:00 am

Yeah I think there is no reason to rush to upgrade this system for a while yet but it does look increasingly good right now and has gained a little bit of latitude. Would think this has a good chance of developing, prehaps sooner then 94L.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22506
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: Invest 95L in Central Atlantic

#40 Postby wxman57 » Fri Aug 22, 2008 6:10 am

Invest 95L is gone from the MRY web site as an invest. I think they're looking at the wrong area for possible development. 95L is part of a wave axis that extends northward to 20N. 95L is the base of the wave. But it's the top part of the wave that typically breaks off and develops. Yesterday, we could clearly see a large rotation at the "crest" of the wave. Look up near 18N/38W, there is convection firing over the broad LLC now. That's the area to watch for potential development.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests