vaffie wrote:I just can't believe that the center is projected to go over Houston exactly.
As should be obvious by now... it's a BAD IDEA™ to focus solely on the forecast line.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
vaffie wrote:I just can't believe that the center is projected to go over Houston exactly.
wxman57 wrote:
Just plotted the 00Z models. Threw out NAM and NOGAPS, kept the better consensus models, HWRF, and GFDL. Tight consensus for Galveston Bay.
hwego7 wrote:Is this because the NHC would make a mistake in overstating the winds or that the measurement instrument would be flawed?wxman57 wrote:Even if it makes hurricane strength, I don't think any obs will register over around 65 sustained.
jeff wrote: Speed up please.
Diva wrote:jeff wrote: Speed up please.
I'll second that! This is like watching a really bad movie. Maybe that's why it's seems to me like this won't make landfall until much later in the day tomorrow than they are forecasting.
wxman57 wrote:Derek Ortt wrote:chances of a hurricane, while not unrealistic, are only about 5-10% now. I do not see a scenario where this exceeds 70KT
Tell you what, after Humberto last year I'd go a good bit higher on this storm with 18 more hours over water temps near 90 degrees. I had 50% on my last forecast. We've been going 75 mph since yesterday for landfall. See no reason to change. However, any 75 mph winds would be in a tiny area offshore. No such winds over land. It would only be a hurricane in name only, really.
I still can't believe the NHC has been forecasting 70 mph winds prior to landfall and no hurricane warning. They must not want to trigger an evacuation, maybe?
Just plotted the 00Z models. Threw out NAM and NOGAPS, kept the better consensus models, HWRF, and GFDL. Tight consensus for Galveston Bay.
hurrican19 wrote:I sure hope for the Austin area's sake, that this thing goes just south of them, that would give them the best chance of rain, which is very desperately needed over there.
txag2005 wrote:According to the evacuation maps, Galveston is the mandatory evac zone for Cat 1 and 2 hurricanes. Since when do they not evacuate until a Cat 3?
http://www.houstontx.gov/oem/images/2008evacmap.pdf
HouTXmetro wrote:Ed looks sick tonight as usual.
physicx07 wrote:The Weather Channel was there today talking to him apparently, and they reported that that is now their policy. Maybe those maps are old. I think they felt burned with Rita or something and perhaps the mayor wants to get re-elected before the next hurricane comes through and wipes out his constituents.txag2005 wrote:According to the evacuation maps, Galveston is the mandatory evac zone for Cat 1 and 2 hurricanes. Since when do they not evacuate until a Cat 3?
http://www.houstontx.gov/oem/images/2008evacmap.pdf
wxman57 wrote:The more I look at Edouard tonight, the more I'm thinking the NHC will make a track shift east at 10, maybe to just east of Houston. If that's the case, then Houston would go through the much weaker western part of the storm. Hardly any TS winds on that side, none to the SW of the center. May have to water my lawn if that's the case.
O Town wrote:physicx07 wrote:The Weather Channel was there today talking to him apparently, and they reported that that is now their policy. Maybe those maps are old. I think they felt burned with Rita or something and perhaps the mayor wants to get re-elected before the next hurricane comes through and wipes out his constituents.txag2005 wrote:According to the evacuation maps, Galveston is the mandatory evac zone for Cat 1 and 2 hurricanes. Since when do they not evacuate until a Cat 3?
http://www.houstontx.gov/oem/images/2008evacmap.pdf
The map has an expiration date of June 2009 on the bottom right corner.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests