TC Bertha
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 37
- Age: 32
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 12:52 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania, USA
- Contact:
Re: Re:
soonertwister wrote:You are missing my point.
Forecast position 7/3 through 7/7:
20.0N 46.5W 07/0600Z 03/0900Z
19.0N 48.0W 07/0600Z 04/0900Z
19.0N 49.3W 07/0600Z 05/0900Z
18.7N 49.5W 07/0600Z 06/0900Z
Actual:
19.3N 50.2W 07/0900Z 07/0900Z
Bertha is:
-0.7N +3.7W from Thursday
+0.3N +1.5W from Friday
+0.3N +0.9W from Saturday
+0.6N +0.7W from Sunday
Bertha's center reformed under the MLC in the last 24 hours. Adjusting for that, the actual deviation over four days (plus 3 hours) is more like -1.1N +3.6W from forecast. How is that not clearly deviation to the west?
Perhaps you could use the ATCF points which are 06z to do your comparisons, rather than the 09z analyses?
0 likes
Re:
WmE wrote:Is it undergoing an ERC or why did the eye get obscured?
Take a look at the IR loops to get a better view. IMO, it was just the combination of the big blowup of convection wrapping around and the moderate southerly shear effecting the storm. I'm guessing it will clear up in within the next couple of hours. Didn't look anything like an ERC to me because the original eye was never that well defined and there hasn't appeared to be a second eyewall (or even a complete main eyewall) in the microwave images.
0 likes
Re: Re:
Seele wrote:WmE wrote:Is it undergoing an ERC or why did the eye get obscured?
Take a look at the IR loops to get a better view. IMO, it was just the combination of the big blowup of convection wrapping around and the moderate southerly shear effecting the storm. I'm guessing it will clear up in within the next couple of hours. Didn't look anything like an ERC to me because the original eye was never that well defined and there hasn't appeared to be a second eyewall (or even a complete main eyewall) in the microwave images.
Yep, thanks for clarification.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 2:52 pm
Re: Re:
Chacor wrote:soonertwister wrote:You are missing my point.
Forecast position 7/3 through 7/7:
20.0N 46.5W 07/0600Z 03/0900Z
19.0N 48.0W 07/0600Z 04/0900Z
19.0N 49.3W 07/0600Z 05/0900Z
18.7N 49.5W 07/0600Z 06/0900Z
Actual:
19.3N 50.2W 07/0900Z 07/0900Z
Bertha is:
-0.7N +3.7W from Thursday
+0.3N +1.5W from Friday
+0.3N +0.9W from Saturday
+0.6N +0.7W from Sunday
Bertha's center reformed under the MLC in the last 24 hours. Adjusting for that, the actual deviation over four days (plus 3 hours) is more like -1.1N +3.6W from forecast. How is that not clearly deviation to the west?
Perhaps you could use the ATCF points which are 06z to do your comparisons, rather than the 09z analyses?
Because the official forecasts were convenent to me, and 3 hours basically seemed irrelevant. so maybe in 3 hours Bertha moved 0.2N 0.8W. So now you have a difference that was more like -0.9N +2.8W from forecast. That's maybe -27N +170W nautical miles from forecast. That's still significant. Of course forecast track will be closer to actual as each forecast point becomes closer to the current time. But the forecast track has been tending to the left and has not been static.
0 likes
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 6108
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: Re:
WmE wrote:Mecklenburg wrote:WmE wrote:Is it undergoing an ERC or why did the eye get obscured?
what do you mean? the eye didn't get obscured
Look at the IR. The eye cooled significantly.
ERC=eyewall replacement cycle.
Dont worry about IR when determining a developing eye...visible clearly shows that its just haze in the eye which is fairly high up, thus creating the illusion that the eye is dissipating. This is usually a sign of intensification, and the eye looks its best yet on visible, so there is no ERC to worry about.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 2:52 pm
Re:
djones65 wrote:Again, soonertwister, it appears from what you posted at the end of page 117 that Bertha is tracking a little north of the NHC forecasts if anything...
It's not. The motion has been faster. It's significantly farther west and a little north. If you adjust for yesterdays LLC relocation of roughly +0.3N or +0.4N and 0.0W or -0.1W from the relocation, it's even more westerly. The LLC relocation didn't change the relative track at all.
0 likes
Re: Hurricane Bertha in Central Atlantic
Bertha seems to be on a more NW heading (add lat/lon grid to see):
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-vis.html
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-vis.html
0 likes
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 6108
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: Hurricane Bertha in Central Atlantic
Frank2 wrote:Bertha seems to be on a more northerly heading:
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-vis.html
I thought so too, but it appears to have just been a wobble, and it looks to be back on its previous w-wnw heading
0 likes
- 'CaneFreak
- Category 5
- Posts: 1486
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
- Location: New Bern, NC
Re: Hurricane Bertha in Central Atlantic
Frank2 wrote:Bertha seems to be on a more NW heading (add lat/lon grid to see):
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-vis.html
Its stairstepping Frank.....like it has for 500 to 600 miles now...nm...yeah...more like about 290 or so now....
Last edited by 'CaneFreak on Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Re: Hurricane Bertha in Central Atlantic
Frank2 wrote:Bertha seems to be on a more NW heading (add lat/lon grid to see):
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-vis.html
definitely more west northwest now.
0 likes
- Category 5
- Category 5
- Posts: 10074
- Age: 35
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
- Location: New Brunswick, NJ
- Contact:
- dixiebreeze
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5140
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
- Location: crystal river, fla.
Re: Hurricane Bertha in Central Atlantic
07/1145 UTC 19.4N 50.7W T4.5/4.5 BERTHA -- Atlantic Ocean
Cat 2 coming up
Cat 2 coming up
0 likes
- littlevince
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:45 am
- Location: Portugal
Re: Re:
Seele wrote:Take a look at the IR loops to get a better view. IMO, it was just the combination of the big blowup of convection wrapping around and the moderate southerly shear effecting the storm. I'm guessing it will clear up in within the next couple of hours. Didn't look anything like an ERC to me because the original eye was never that well defined and there hasn't appeared to be a second eyewall (or even a complete main eyewall) in the microwave images.
By the way, was this an ERC early today ?

Loop: http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/9859 ... r05oa3.gif
0 likes
- Category 5
- Category 5
- Posts: 10074
- Age: 35
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
- Location: New Brunswick, NJ
- Contact:
Re: Hurricane Bertha in Central Atlantic
cycloneye wrote:A very nice looking hurricane:
Steady strengthening since yesterday is clearly continuing. Certainly going to be Category 2 at 5pm.
0 likes
- Category 5
- Category 5
- Posts: 10074
- Age: 35
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
- Location: New Brunswick, NJ
- Contact:
Re: Re:
littlevince wrote:Seele wrote:Take a look at the IR loops to get a better view. IMO, it was just the combination of the big blowup of convection wrapping around and the moderate southerly shear effecting the storm. I'm guessing it will clear up in within the next couple of hours. Didn't look anything like an ERC to me because the original eye was never that well defined and there hasn't appeared to be a second eyewall (or even a complete main eyewall) in the microwave images.
By the way, was this an ERC early today ?
Loop: http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/9859 ... r05oa3.gif
Doesn't look like it. They usually take considerably longer then that also.
0 likes
- george_r_1961
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 3171
- Age: 64
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 9:14 pm
- Location: Hampton, Virginia
Re:
Scorpion wrote:It's an absolute travesty that there are no scheduled recon flights into this system. This is at least 90 kt right now.
Its not going to threaten land for several days if at all. With the high cost of fuel im sure they are being more selective as to what systems are investigated.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests