ATL IKE: Models Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
jeff
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 831
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 6:14 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#2541 Postby jeff » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:00 pm

jeff wrote:
gboudx wrote:
jeff wrote:I hold from Matagorda Bay to Vermillion Bay...narrowing toward the TX/LA state line. That is the best right now at days out. Landfall late Saturday afternoon or early evening. I echo again that well developed Gulf storms moving greater than 8mph tend to track right of NHC and guidance. So if NHC puts this into Matagorda Bay at 400pm Monday...look out upper TX/SW LA coast.


jeff, I get your updates and if you remember, I sent you an email about my folks in SELA using your updates as guides for their own preparations. Right now, they have a hotel booked up here in Rockwall, but they don't want to pull the trigger on that if they don't have to. I won't ask you to tell me if they should or should not leave based on what you stated in the quoted text. But what do you think the affects would be in NOLA with that landfall position?


Likely similar to Rita...We should know much better Tuesday. Will not give the all clear for SE LA as that would be not the correct action...but I feel the threat is more west of that area.


Call me anytime...you have my number
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#2542 Postby Wx_Warrior » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:00 pm

Jeff,

You seem very sure on location several days out and some model uncertainty. What Golden Triangle folks don't understand that traffic wasn't too bad last week leaving for Gustav because this part of Texas was the only area under evac. If Galv and/or Hou has to leave, this could be a nightmare scenario trying to get out.

Here's hoping you are wrong and, I will thank you for being wrong if you are.
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#2543 Postby Dean4Storms » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:00 pm

Man that is a general consensus this far out, what a mess.
0 likes   

User avatar
gboudx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4080
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:39 pm
Location: Rockwall, Tx but from Harvey, La

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#2544 Postby gboudx » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:01 pm

jeff wrote:Call me anytime...you have my number


Very kind of you sir. Thanks again.
0 likes   

jeff
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 831
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 6:14 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#2545 Postby jeff » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:03 pm

Wx_Warrior wrote:Jeff,

You seem very sure on location several days out and some model uncertainty. What Golden Triangle folks don't understand that traffic wasn't too bad last week leaving for Gustav because this part of Texas was the only area under evac. If Galv and/or Hou has to leave, this could be a nightmare scenario trying to get out.

Here's hoping you are wrong and, I will thank you for being wrong if you are.


I am not sure how many people left for Gustav from Jefferson County...it seems that not many left...a lot of wait and see type of action...This will not be the same deal.

Plan is for HOU/GAL not to use US 59 N so SE TX can flow N into US 59 and then it will be contra flowed. That is the plan...if the public does not listen then it will be Rita all over again.
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#2546 Postby HouTXmetro » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:05 pm

Going to be a close call for Houston area either way. Looks like we might be on the clean side of the storm if the storm tends to track right of the guidance and NHC.
0 likes   

jeff
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 831
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 6:14 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re:

#2547 Postby jeff » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:06 pm

HouTXmetro wrote:Going to be a close call for Houston area either way. Looks like we might be on the clean side of the storm if the storm tends to track right of the guidance and NHC.


A hit in SW LA would be like Rita in SE TX with strong TS winds across HOU and Hurricane force across BPT.

A BPT hit would likely put hurricane force winds into at least E Harris.
0 likes   

User avatar
Diva
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 11:46 am
Location: Orange, TX

Re: Re:

#2548 Postby Diva » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:07 pm

Dean4Storms wrote:
Diva wrote:
Dean4Storms wrote:I hate to say it but better this hits near the TX/LA border than just about anywhere within 100 miles east or west of that border.



If you hate to say it then you shouldn't! That's right over my house!! :grr:


I'm sorry, I was just trying to place it at a landfall with the least amount of population. But I understand where you are coming from, been there and done it twice with Ivan and Dennis.


Oh, I understand. I think one thing that people don't realize is that this is the I-10 corridor and, when LA is evacuating west and then we get called for an evacuation as well, it quickly goes from an area of "least amount of population" to an extremely LARGE population. I-10 becomes a literal parking lot of people going nowhere fast.

Question....anyone have an educated guess as to what way Ike will travel once he's made landfall? I realize it's way off but it will have a huge bearing on where I will make evac plans to if/when the need arises.
0 likes   

jwayne
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 242
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 12:33 pm

Re: Re:

#2549 Postby jwayne » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:07 pm

jeff wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:Going to be a close call for Houston area either way. Looks like we might be on the clean side of the storm if the storm tends to track right of the guidance and NHC.


A hit in SW LA would be like Rita in SE TX with strong TS winds across HOU and Hurricane force across BPT.

A BPT hit would likely put hurricane force winds into at least E Harris.


Jeff, one more question: I know it's almost impossible to predict intensity this far out, but are we looking at a realistic possibility of this thing being above a cat 3 or more likely a cat 3 or lower?

thanks
Last edited by jwayne on Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: Re:

#2550 Postby HouTXmetro » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:09 pm

jeff wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:Going to be a close call for Houston area either way. Looks like we might be on the clean side of the storm if the storm tends to track right of the guidance and NHC.


A hit in SW LA would be like Rita in SE TX with strong TS winds across HOU and Hurricane force across BPT.

A BPT hit would likely put hurricane force winds into at least E Harris.


What are your thoughts about the EURO and south Texas? Is it unrealistic?
0 likes   

smw1981
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 253
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 9:04 pm
Location: Alabamer

#2551 Postby smw1981 » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:10 pm

The problem with making statements that predict the exact location a hurricane will hit 5,6, or 7 days out is that everyone in the area will begin to panic when the hurricane is a week away!

If Texas starts a mandatory evac on Wednesday, then on Thursday the storm looks like it's headed more towards LA, imagine the roads/traffic situation. It COULD create a horrible road/getaway situation for the people actually in the direct path of the storm (with millions more people panicing).

And to the person that posted the "If you're not from Texas, you don't understand...", I imagine that everyone who lives on the coast feels that exact same way. I live in north Alabama, and yet I could say the same thing about AGC, MGC, NO, etc...mainly because when they evacuate, they come up here creating horrific traffic 4-5 hours north of the coast. Therefore, I think everyone understands 8-)
0 likes   

jeff
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 831
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 6:14 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: Re:

#2552 Postby jeff » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:12 pm

HouTXmetro wrote:
jeff wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:Going to be a close call for Houston area either way. Looks like we might be on the clean side of the storm if the storm tends to track right of the guidance and NHC.


A hit in SW LA would be like Rita in SE TX with strong TS winds across HOU and Hurricane force across BPT.

A BPT hit would likely put hurricane force winds into at least E Harris.


What are your thoughts about the EURO and south Texas? Is it unrealistic?


It is likely a little too far south...but I think it has the right thinking with the ridge...It has been the benchmark trend setter with this storm...along with the UKMET. I think they will remain aimed at the lower to middle coast with the GFS toward the upper TX/SW LA and the GFDL and HWRF in SW LA or C LA. I could see a little more trending west and then in 2-3 days a slight trend eastward...more experience with Gulf storms this time of year. Still keeps me in my area from Matagorda to Vermillion.
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#2553 Postby Wx_Warrior » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:15 pm

And if Galveston or just west...?
0 likes   

jeff
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 831
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 6:14 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re:

#2554 Postby jeff » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:15 pm

smw1981 wrote:The problem with making statements that predict the exact location a hurricane will hit 5,6, or 7 days out is that everyone in the area will begin to panic when the hurricane is a week away!

If Texas starts a mandatory evac on Wednesday, then on Thursday the storm looks like it's headed more towards LA, imagine the roads/traffic situation. It COULD create a horrible road/getaway situation for the people actually in the direct path of the storm (with millions more people panicing).

And to the person that posted the "If you're not from Texas, you don't understand...", I imagine that everyone who lives on the coast feels that exact same way. I live in north Alabama, and yet I could say the same thing about AGC, MGC, NO, etc...mainly because when they evacuate, they come up here creating horrific traffic 4-5 hours north of the coast. Therefore, I think everyone understands 8-)


Problem is when you have large coastal populations like in Hou/Gal you have to make the call early so you can get everyone out in time. Now with contra-flow the trigger is even sooner so the state can get the exchange points ready and sweep the "inbound lanes" Takes 40 hours to clear GLS county...Trigger is usually H-48 to H-42, but the not public call is made much sooner H-72...so all the resources can be placed in the proper locations
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#2555 Postby Stratosphere747 » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:16 pm

Not to much different that what 57 shared. Track at 11 will most likely imply the threat to the mid and upper Texas coast.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22985
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Re:

#2556 Postby wxman57 » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:18 pm

jwayne wrote:
Jeff, one more question: I know it's almost impossible to predict intensity this far out, but are we looking at a realistic possibility of this thing being above a cat 3 or more likely a cat 3 or lower?

thanks


I would think it has a better chance of being weaker than a 3. We'll have to see what's left of Ike after spending 36 hours over Cuba. It can take a hurricane quite a few days to recover from such an extended time over land.
0 likes   

jeff
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 831
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 6:14 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: Re:

#2557 Postby jeff » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:18 pm

jwayne wrote:
jeff wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:Going to be a close call for Houston area either way. Looks like we might be on the clean side of the storm if the storm tends to track right of the guidance and NHC.


A hit in SW LA would be like Rita in SE TX with strong TS winds across HOU and Hurricane force across BPT.

A BPT hit would likely put hurricane force winds into at least E Harris.


Jeff, one more question: I know it's almost impossible to predict intensity this far out, but are we looking at a realistic possibility of this thing being above a cat 3 or more likely a cat 3 or lower?

thanks


I think a cat 3 looks generally good...low end likely. Could be a cat 4 or a cat 2. Will have to see what Cuba does...but there is plenty of time for Ike to rebuild its inner core over the Gulf and besides some dry air entrainment which happens in the Gulf this time of year...everything else look good to go...moreso than Gustav. However, some storms are not able to rebuild their inner cores as easily as others.. ie Isidore 2002.
0 likes   

sphelps8681
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 785
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 5:37 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow

Re:

#2558 Postby sphelps8681 » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:20 pm

smw1981 wrote:The problem with making statements that predict the exact location a hurricane will hit 5,6, or 7 days out is that everyone in the area will begin to panic when the hurricane is a week away!

If Texas starts a mandatory evac on Wednesday, then on Thursday the storm looks like it's headed more towards LA, imagine the roads/traffic situation. It COULD create a horrible road/getaway situation for the people actually in the direct path of the storm (with millions more people panicing).

And to the person that posted the "If you're not from Texas, you don't understand...", I imagine that everyone who lives on the coast feels that exact same way. I live in north Alabama, and yet I could say the same thing about AGC, MGC, NO, etc...mainly because when they evacuate, they come up here creating horrific traffic 4-5 hours north of the coast. Therefore, I think everyone understands 8-)


I evacuated for Gustav and the thing did not even come here. We evacuated to the Toledo Bend area not knowing it would eventually head there. Ended up evacuating again from there back home. I would do it again. But evacuations take time. We will need a start on Wednesday, for the forcast for Friday will be TS force winds from what I understand. If it comes here. I heard Beaumont takes around 32 hours to evacuate. I don't want to hurry up and get out evac.
0 likes   

jeff
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 831
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 6:14 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: Re:

#2559 Postby jeff » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:21 pm

sphelps8681 wrote:
smw1981 wrote:The problem with making statements that predict the exact location a hurricane will hit 5,6, or 7 days out is that everyone in the area will begin to panic when the hurricane is a week away!

If Texas starts a mandatory evac on Wednesday, then on Thursday the storm looks like it's headed more towards LA, imagine the roads/traffic situation. It COULD create a horrible road/getaway situation for the people actually in the direct path of the storm (with millions more people panicing).

And to the person that posted the "If you're not from Texas, you don't understand...", I imagine that everyone who lives on the coast feels that exact same way. I live in north Alabama, and yet I could say the same thing about AGC, MGC, NO, etc...mainly because when they evacuate, they come up here creating horrific traffic 4-5 hours north of the coast. Therefore, I think everyone understands 8-)


I evacuated for Gustav and the thing did not even come here. We evacuated to the Toledo Bend area not knowing it would eventually head there. Ended up evacuating again from there back home. I would do it again. But evacuations take time. We will need a start on Wednesday, for the forcast for Friday will be TS force winds from what I understand. If it comes here. I heard Beaumont takes around 32 hours to evacuate. I don't want to hurry up and get out evac.


This is what I say at my hurricane presentations "If you live on the coast...you must be willing to evacuate and have nothing happen."
0 likes   

User avatar
Texashawk
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 579
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:50 am
Location: Missouri City, TX (Houston)

Re:

#2560 Postby Texashawk » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:24 pm

smw1981 wrote:The problem with making statements that predict the exact location a hurricane will hit 5,6, or 7 days out is that everyone in the area will begin to panic when the hurricane is a week away!

If Texas starts a mandatory evac on Wednesday, then on Thursday the storm looks like it's headed more towards LA, imagine the roads/traffic situation. It COULD create a horrible road/getaway situation for the people actually in the direct path of the storm (with millions more people panicing).

And to the person that posted the "If you're not from Texas, you don't understand...", I imagine that everyone who lives on the coast feels that exact same way. I live in north Alabama, and yet I could say the same thing about AGC, MGC, NO, etc...mainly because when they evacuate, they come up here creating horrific traffic 4-5 hours north of the coast. Therefore, I think everyone understands 8-)



If you're referring to my post, I didn't mean it in the sense that we just understand better than others. I meant it in the sense that we have an enormous population to move, more than most population centers along the coast, and the logistics for such a move must be set in motion well in advance and it changes the scope of a very large area. Again, no offense intended, just I don't know that people truly understand just how many people live on the UTX coast.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests