ATL IKE: Models Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Viper54r
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:08 am

Re:

#2721 Postby Viper54r » Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:16 am

superfly wrote:6Z GFS: Ike not picked up by the trough, moving west towards Texas

You're calling that through 114 hrs?
0 likes   

caneman

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#2722 Postby caneman » Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:18 am

Can't see it making it to Tampa unless some major slow down, stall in the GOM occurs but do think Ms. to Panhnadle are very much in play on a NE hook
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#2723 Postby KWT » Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:19 am

Does look like it only moves slightly north of west through 108-120hrs...
0 likes   

User avatar
stormhorn
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 25
Age: 58
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 1:59 pm
Location: Gulf Shores, Al.

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#2724 Postby stormhorn » Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:19 am

caneman wrote:Can't see it making it to Tampa unless some major slow down, stall in the GOM occurs but do think Ms. to Panhnadle are very much in play on a NE hook

NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!! :eek: :eek: :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
stormhorn
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 25
Age: 58
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 1:59 pm
Location: Gulf Shores, Al.

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#2725 Postby stormhorn » Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:22 am

What the He!!?? Went to bed thinking, "Ahhhh...Texas!" Wake up to this blasphemy.
0 likes   

caneman

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#2726 Postby caneman » Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:22 am

can someone please post the run? The sites I use doesn't have the 06 run yet
0 likes   

Viper54r
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:08 am

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#2727 Postby Viper54r » Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:23 am

Same ole 00Z hook between 126 and 144
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#2728 Postby dwg71 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:24 am

144 hours just stalled off sw la coast.
0 likes   

caneman

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#2729 Postby caneman » Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:25 am

stormhorn wrote:What the He!!?? Went to bed thinking, "Ahhhh...Texas!" Wake up to this blasphemy.


One again, you can't get hung up on the 06 run For the last 2 days they've trended East. If you see that trend there with later runs then you have cause for concern, however, it is still many days away.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#2730 Postby Air Force Met » Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:25 am

Ed Mahmoud wrote:6Z GFS even further east than 0Z. The trend has begun, and the trend is Texas friend. I suspect the 12Z models will continue, and my prediction I backed away from, Lake Charles to Tampa, centered on Mobile, would have been a good one if I hadn't gotten nervous.

Very unofficial, Lake Charles to Panama City Beach, centered between Morgan City and Mobile. Very unofficial and quite amateur,



:?:

Its further west. Not sure where you are getting that its further east. Its 200 miles further west at day 6.

00z

Image

06z

Image



00z
Image

06z

Image
0 likes   

caneman

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#2731 Postby caneman » Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:28 am

Models from different ends of the spectrum starting to lock in on an area but still many days away. And that lock in could change by several hundred miles either way within a couple of days.
0 likes   

User avatar
stormhorn
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 25
Age: 58
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 1:59 pm
Location: Gulf Shores, Al.

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#2732 Postby stormhorn » Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:28 am

caneman wrote:
stormhorn wrote:What the He!!?? Went to bed thinking, "Ahhhh...Texas!" Wake up to this blasphemy.


One again, you can't get hung up on the 06 run For the last 2 days they've trended East. If you see that trend there with later runs then you have cause for concern, however, it is still many days away.

Ohhh..Ok?? You don't think it will ACTUALLY go between Miss and Panhandle. :bday:
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#2733 Postby dwg71 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:30 am

156 hours and still off shore
0 likes   

caneman

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#2734 Postby caneman » Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:30 am

stormhorn wrote:
caneman wrote:
stormhorn wrote:What the He!!?? Went to bed thinking, "Ahhhh...Texas!" Wake up to this blasphemy.


One again, you can't get hung up on the 06 run For the last 2 days they've trended East. If you see that trend there with later runs then you have cause for concern, however, it is still many days away.

Ohhh..Ok?? You don't think it will ACTUALLY go between Miss and Panhandle. :bday:



everyone has a guess/opinion. I'm just an amateur who has followed these things for many years. Follow the NHC. Track these things long enough and you will too
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#2735 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:33 am

Air Force Met wrote:
Ed Mahmoud wrote:6Z GFS even further east than 0Z. The trend has begun, and the trend is Texas friend. I suspect the 12Z models will continue, and my prediction I backed away from, Lake Charles to Tampa, centered on Mobile, would have been a good one if I hadn't gotten nervous.

Very unofficial, Lake Charles to Panama City Beach, centered between Morgan City and Mobile. Very unofficial and quite amateur,



:?:

Its further west. Not sure where you are getting that its further east. Its 200 miles further west at day 6.

00z

Image

06z

Image



00z
Image

06z

Image



See edit. I realized I clicked on wrong thingie on FSU experimental page and fixed it before you even posted on the error.
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#2736 Postby dwg71 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:33 am

168 hours and still off shore
0 likes   

superfly

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#2737 Postby superfly » Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:33 am

Stalled off TX/LA border for 2 days.

132h:
Image

174h:
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
stormhorn
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 25
Age: 58
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 1:59 pm
Location: Gulf Shores, Al.

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#2738 Postby stormhorn » Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:35 am

One again, you can't get hung up on the 06 run For the last 2 days they've trended East. If you see that trend there with later runs then you have cause for concern, however, it is still many days away.[/quote]
Ohhh..Ok?? You don't think it will ACTUALLY go between Miss and Panhandle. :bday:[/quote]


everyone has a guess/opinion. I'm just an amateur who has followed these things for many years. Follow the NHC. Track these things long enough and you will too[/quote]
Note where I live :roll: Tracking these things isn't a NEW proposition. :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
vaffie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 898
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:11 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#2739 Postby vaffie » Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:38 am

Interesting to note that it appears on its present heading it will indeed make it to the Caribbean coast. This was only observed for the Euro and the UKMET models. So their more southerly tracks should not be discounted so much as it's current position and track will have longer scale implications for its ultimate track.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#2740 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:41 am

vaffie wrote:Interesting to note that it appears on its present heading it will indeed make it to the Caribbean coast. This was only observed for the Euro and the UKMET models. So their more southerly tracks should not be discounted so much as it's current position and track will have longer scale implications for its ultimate track.



If I saw more convection in the Caribbean than I do now, I might believe it might pull the center into the Caribbean, but I don't. I think Ike may spend a fair amount of time over Cuba. It should be past the mountainous parts, and Cuba is narrow enough it still is getting good ocean air from both sides, but even NHC discussion hinted it would probably be weaker than official forecast.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests