Myanmar / TC NARGIS (TC 01B) Update: 84,500 dead

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
hurricanetrack
HurricaneTrack.com
HurricaneTrack.com
Posts: 1781
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:46 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

Myanmar Cyclone

#381 Postby hurricanetrack » Tue May 06, 2008 7:48 am

It seems that the death toll from the weekend cyclone that struck Myanmar is rising to absurd levels. My question is that: what is the cause of all the deaths? Storm surge? It am not seeing the cause mentioned. I assume it is surge since Myanmar is in the NE corner of the Bay of Bengal. Any insight from you all on this tragic event would be helpful.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: Bay of Bengal: NARGIS (TC 01B) Update=22,000 dead

#382 Postby RL3AO » Tue May 06, 2008 7:48 am

0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: Bay of Bengal: NARGIS (TC 01B) Update=22,000 dead

#383 Postby HURAKAN » Tue May 06, 2008 7:51 am

Cyclones, hurricanes and typhoons

Code: Select all

Death Toll  ↓    Event  ↓    Location  ↓    Date  ↓
500,000 500,000    Bhola cyclone    Bangladesh    1970
300,000 300,000    1839 Coringa cyclone    India    1839
300,000 300,000    cyclone    Vietnam    1881
300,000 300,000[1]    1737 Calcutta cyclone    India    1737
229,000 229,000    Super Typhoon Nina - contributed to Banqiao Dam failure    China    1975
200,000 200,000[2]    1876 Bengal cyclone    present day Bangladesh    1876
138,866 138,866    1991 Bangladesh cyclone    Bangladesh    1991
060,000 60,000    1922 Swatow Typhoon    China    1922
060,000 60,000    1864 Calcutta cyclone    India    1864
050,000 50,000    1912 Wenzhou typhoon    China    1912
040,000 40,000    1942 Bengal Calcutta cyclone    India    1942
015,000 22,464+    Tropical Cyclone Nargis    Myanmar    2008


Nargis becomes the 12th deadliest cyclone in history.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34001
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#384 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue May 06, 2008 8:14 am

This is like 12 Katrinas now...
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143923
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Bay of Bengal: NARGIS (TC 01B) Update=22,000 dead

#385 Postby cycloneye » Tue May 06, 2008 8:17 am

50,000+

:uarrow: More very sad news.HURAKAN,now up to ten.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#386 Postby Chacor » Tue May 06, 2008 8:19 am

Somehow, CNN have managed to get a correspondent into Burma, into Bogalay to be precise. CNN says he described seeing houses flattened for 35 km. The minister is saying 95% of homes in Bogalay (pop. 190,000) had been destroyed.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#387 Postby Chacor » Tue May 06, 2008 8:19 am

That's a "fear", not a confirmed report. The official confirmed toll right now is still 22,000+. Until it's confirmed, it's not a wise idea to say 50,000 dead in the topic title.
0 likes   

StormspinnerD2

#388 Postby StormspinnerD2 » Tue May 06, 2008 8:21 am

50,000+ deaths are feared, that's not the actual report. The latest number was at least 22,464.

Also, Hello32020 posted that already.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 42
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#389 Postby senorpepr » Tue May 06, 2008 8:49 am

Chacor wrote:Reports coming in that a minister is saying most of the deaths were caused by a 12-foot tidal surge.


viewtopic.php?f=59&t=100816&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=360
0 likes   

Typhoon Hunter
WesternPacificWeather.com
WesternPacificWeather.com
Posts: 1221
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:37 am
Location: Tokyo
Contact:

Re: Myanmar Cyclone

#390 Postby Typhoon Hunter » Tue May 06, 2008 8:55 am

Wikipedia have an article running on Nargis at the moment. The before and after satellite shots show that VAST areas have been innundated by the storm surge and thus killed tens of thousands.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclone_Nargis
0 likes   

Typhoon Hunter
WesternPacificWeather.com
WesternPacificWeather.com
Posts: 1221
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:37 am
Location: Tokyo
Contact:

Re: Bay of Bengal: NARGIS (TC 01B) Update=+22,000 dead

#391 Postby Typhoon Hunter » Tue May 06, 2008 9:06 am

Looking at those before and after pics posted below the area of flooding is insane and I guess responsible for the majority of deaths. Surely the angle of landfall has huge spread floods over a larger length of coasline. The area east of Yangon from Pegu to Moulmein looks underwater. Correct me if I'm wrong but this would not have happened if Nargis had made landfall at a right angle at the mouths of the Irrawaddy?
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanetrack
HurricaneTrack.com
HurricaneTrack.com
Posts: 1781
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:46 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

#392 Postby hurricanetrack » Tue May 06, 2008 9:27 am

Excellent information. Not a catastrophic surge in terms of height, Katrina was double that is many areas. Yet we hear that scores of people are gone. What went wrong? How can this still happen in such a modern age?
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#393 Postby Derek Ortt » Tue May 06, 2008 9:33 am

the whole coastline may not have been flooded, but had it struck at a right angle, the surge almost certainly would have been over 20 feet instead of 12 feet and stronger winds may have been felt in Rangoon
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#394 Postby Derek Ortt » Tue May 06, 2008 10:08 am

may have been a combination of the two.

I wonder if many people tried to seek shelter in the upper portions of their structures outside of the surge only to have those parts blown away. The same thing would have happened had Katrina not been severely sheared at the time of landfall
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#395 Postby RL3AO » Tue May 06, 2008 10:25 am

It sounds like the impact on rice crops was really bad.
0 likes   

User avatar
somethingfunny
ChatStaff
ChatStaff
Posts: 3926
Age: 36
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:30 pm
Location: McKinney, Texas

Re: Myanmar Cyclone

#396 Postby somethingfunny » Tue May 06, 2008 10:39 am

Also remember that Myanmar's rulers never issued warnings of the storm's impending landfall so millions of people who might have evacuated a similar storm in another country were unaware of the danger

Most of the responsibility falls on the junta, but remember that even if they had issued a timely warning and ordered an evacuation of the coast.....if Myanmar's military rulers ordered YOU to leave your home and get on a transport headed inland....what would you have done? Except for the lucky few with black-market sattelite connections who could have seen the (surprisingly adequate) forecasts coming from India's IMD....anybody in their right mind would have taken their chances with the cyclone given the choice, I imagine.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 42
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

Re:

#397 Postby senorpepr » Tue May 06, 2008 10:52 am

RL3AO wrote:It sounds like the impact on rice crops was really bad.


I was thinking about this yesterday. There has already been an impact to the jasmine rice production in this part of the world. After Nargis, rice prices are bound to rise even further, especially impacting the markets in SE and E Asia.
0 likes   

User avatar
Rachell
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 6
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 7:36 am
Location: Shenzhen,PRC
Contact:

#398 Postby Rachell » Tue May 06, 2008 11:09 am

sorry to hear that :eek:

However, it's the time for them to wake up, the week CYCLONE and TIDE protection is to be blamed.The condition will be better if NARGIS made landfall in other places such as CHINA- -At least the number of death won't be so ridiculous :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#399 Postby KWT » Tue May 06, 2008 11:16 am

Wow this is truely turning into a shocking disaster, 50,000 deaths sadly probably is realistic and to think like Derek said it could have been even worse in terms of impact.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#400 Postby HURAKAN » Tue May 06, 2008 12:28 pm

We can clearly say that this has been the deadliest cyclone since the 1991 Bangladesh Cyclone.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests