ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#5681 Postby jinftl » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:07 pm

Excerpt from article below on "shade evacuation" problem

http://blogs.chron.com/sciguy/archives/2007/08/should_you_stay_1.html

Now, should you go?

The answer lies in where you live, and the extent to which you are comfortable with the structure of your home. Following so closely after Hurricane Katrina, Rita prompted a lot of people to evacuate who normally might not have.

Prior to Rita, during a "successful" evacuation, officials planned to get 70 percent to 80 percent of residents out of evacuation zones. Of those who would evacuate, officials planned, about 10 percent to 20 percent would "shadow evacuees" not from the recommended zones. During Rita 85 percent to 90 percent of people left from evacuation zones, and more than half of everyone who left -- 1.5 million people -- were shadow evacuees. That, in part, explains the gridlock.

At the beginning of this year city and county officials took pains to urge residents who live outside of the surge zone to seriously consider not evacuating. Who lives in the surge zone?.


mpic wrote:
Jessie wrote:How many miles inland is the City of Houston? Years ago I lived in the Clear Creek area and I remember Galveston was 30 miles South and Houston was 30 miles North. Is that wrong? We don't evacuate in Mobile either unless we're in areas that flood. My house (according to Google Earth) is 20 miles from the Gulf. I wish so badly that the news would do segments on who should not evacuate when a storm is approaching. They act like the whole city is going to be blown down and that is just not true. I went through Frederic and my house didn't move an inch during the storm ---- the sliding glass doors were a problem, but that was it. The news should tell people what trees are most vulnerable during a storm and also why you cover windows --- it's not to keep the rug dry :-) People wouldn't panic so much if they were given a little bit more information.


Totally agree I live 20 miles north of Gal and 6 miles from the Bay. Clear Lake flooded badly with Alicia ( where Nasa is and is now Houston). Heck, it floods with just a major rain storm. They DO need better communication and you can bet that I will be voicing it after this is over and the same garbage happens again.

Back on topic...is that ridge moving west at all or did I miss it?
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3999
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

Re:

#5682 Postby AJC3 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:07 pm

dwg71 wrote:AJ3 that loops shows a lot of dry air coming into the center near the end...


That's what I was talking about when I said the moat that had been surrounding the remnant inner core was starting to clear out everything inside the outer convective ring.


Here's some more Ike stuff I put together...Pico San Juan radar loop (5 3/4 hrs) out 345 PM

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
TampaFl
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1904
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 11:23 am
Location: Tampa, FL

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#5683 Postby TampaFl » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:08 pm

Ridge is still holding very strong - WOW!


Image
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#5684 Postby dwg71 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:09 pm

What does that mean AJ3 in regards to strengthening/weakening?
0 likes   

User avatar
haml8
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 188
Age: 49
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: Katy, Texas
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#5685 Postby haml8 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:09 pm

TampaFl wrote:Ridge is still holding very strong - WOW!


Image


Which layer is that? (in MBs)
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#5686 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:10 pm

Image
0 likes   

rtd2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 12:45 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#5687 Postby rtd2 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:11 pm

haml8 wrote:
TampaFl wrote:Ridge is still holding very strong - WOW!


Image


Which layer is that? (in MBs)




looks to be 300-850
0 likes   

jhpigott
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 570
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:09 pm
Location: North Palm Beach, Florida

#5688 Postby jhpigott » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:12 pm

looks like Ike is thinking about heading inland again . . .
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4822
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#5689 Postby ronjon » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:13 pm

definite W-NW movement - might even be a wobble NW - Ike might be headed inland now.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re:

#5690 Postby gatorcane » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:13 pm

jhpigott wrote:looks like Ike is thinking about heading inland again . . .


yeah seems to be a noticeable NW wobble...and Ike is almost inland
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#5691 Postby KWT » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:14 pm

Well I can see a WNW breifly BUT the key thing here is not to follow the tight inner core as that is weakening(though it seems to be holding steady now as that WNW wobble has shifted the outer eyewall even more over land) and the outer eyewall is trying to take over, so the actual center will probably be quite loose now and as long as that larger eye feature remains in place then it will still take in energy from the south even if it does rake the coast.
0 likes   

User avatar
haml8
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 188
Age: 49
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: Katy, Texas
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#5692 Postby haml8 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:15 pm

Ed, what is JB saying... looking at the model that they provide it seems that SETX Texas is on their mind and they are split between SETX and South texas padre etc..
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#5693 Postby dwg71 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:15 pm

Any guesses on a track change or intensity at 5PM.

I would think they would have to move track further south, especially mid track. They might have final point inland around 28.5N 95W or they may leave it just offshore.

Intesity will generously be set at 70KTS
0 likes   

User avatar
Weatherfreak14
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1383
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 3:40 pm
Location: Beaufort, SC
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#5694 Postby Weatherfreak14 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:18 pm

ronjon wrote:definite W-NW movement - might even be a wobble NW - Ike might be headed inland now.


Looks like it will be back on shore agin in the next hour or so. Hopefully it stays on for the rest of the way.
0 likes   

User avatar
mpic
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 622
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Splendora, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#5695 Postby mpic » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:19 pm

jinftl wrote:Excerpt from article below on "shade evacuation" problem

http://blogs.chron.com/sciguy/archives/2007/08/should_you_stay_1.html

Now, should you go?

The answer lies in where you live, and the extent to which you are comfortable with the structure of your home. Following so closely after Hurricane Katrina, Rita prompted a lot of people to evacuate who normally might not have.

Prior to Rita, during a "successful" evacuation, officials planned to get 70 percent to 80 percent of residents out of evacuation zones. Of those who would evacuate, officials planned, about 10 percent to 20 percent would "shadow evacuees" not from the recommended zones. During Rita 85 percent to 90 percent of people left from evacuation zones, and more than half of everyone who left -- 1.5 million people -- were shadow evacuees. That, in part, explains the gridlock.

At the beginning of this year city and county officials took pains to urge residents who live outside of the surge zone to seriously consider not evacuating. Who lives in the surge zone?.


mpic wrote:
Jessie wrote:How many miles inland is the City of Houston? Years ago I lived in the Clear Creek area and I remember Galveston was 30 miles South and Houston was 30 miles North. Is that wrong? We don't evacuate in Mobile either unless we're in areas that flood. My house (according to Google Earth) is 20 miles from the Gulf. I wish so badly that the news would do segments on who should not evacuate when a storm is approaching. They act like the whole city is going to be blown down and that is just not true. I went through Frederic and my house didn't move an inch during the storm ---- the sliding glass doors were a problem, but that was it. The news should tell people what trees are most vulnerable during a storm and also why you cover windows --- it's not to keep the rug dry :-) People wouldn't panic so much if they were given a little bit more information.


Totally agree I live 20 miles north of Gal and 6 miles from the Bay. Clear Lake flooded badly with Alicia ( where Nasa is and is now Houston). Heck, it floods with just a major rain storm. They DO need better communication and you can bet that I will be voicing it after this is over and the same garbage happens again.

Back on topic...is that ridge moving west at all or did I miss it?


As you can see, most of Houston does not. I live on that line between 146 and I-45 in the yellow area (zone A) on the NE side.
0 likes   

caneman

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#5696 Postby caneman » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:19 pm

Stay safe Texans if it come your way. Another day or two tracking like this wil lbe real cause for concern but a 50-100 mile shift even just 24 hours out can make all the difference in the world. Charley shifted just East of us and from what I'm told people in this area didn't even know it had passed due to us being on the West side with dry air. Of course, I evacuated right into Charley. Don't make that mistake. :oops:
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#5697 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:20 pm

haml8 wrote:Ed, what is JB saying... looking at the model that they provide it seems that SETX Texas is on their mind and they are split between SETX and South texas padre etc..



On the video, he barely mentioned Ike except to draw a very quick line towards Louisiana, but it wasn't a thoughtfully drawn out line. (I know the difference). No column update since early morning. Yesterday he was (not) liking Louisiana, and the inference from the quickie line was still Louisiana, but it is almost like he doesn't want to make a forecast.


I'd think, if it were coming anywhere near Houston, in his opinion, he wouldn't be shy about writing about it. Ditto any big coastal city, New York, Philly, Miami, NOLA, Houston. He usually isn't shy about pushing that.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re:

#5698 Postby KWT » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:21 pm

dwg71 wrote:Any guesses on a track change or intensity at 5PM.

I would think they would have to move track further south, especially mid track. They might have final point inland around 28.5N 95W or they may leave it just offshore.

Intesity will generously be set at 70KTS


Agreed they may even lower it to 65kts based on what recon has been showing recently.

The problem for Ike is that inner core is disrupted. Not through land but through the fact it was jsut starting an EWRC as it was coming overland and that seems to have just allowed the system to wind down pretty readily.

That should mean a pretty powerful hurricane.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#5699 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:21 pm

I know my house is safely inland, and the only tree in the yard might smash the garage, but not the house. But my wife spent a week w/o electricity during Alicia, and has made it clear she never wants to do that again.
0 likes   

User avatar
mpic
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 622
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Splendora, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#5700 Postby mpic » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:21 pm

caneman wrote:Stay safe Texans if it come your way. Another day or two tracking like this wil lbe real cause for concern but a 50-100 mile shift even just 24 hours out can make all the difference in the world. Charley shifted just East of us and from what I'm told people in this area didn't even know it had passed due to us being on the West side with dry air. Of course, I evacuated right into Charley. Don't make that mistake. :oops:


Thanks caneman...I made that same mistake and went east to Woodville north of Beaumont for Rita. This time I'm going straight north 100 miles. Off to pack up the truck again and will be back on later.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests