ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
DanKellFla
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1291
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:02 pm
Location: Lake Worth, Florida

Re:

#8061 Postby DanKellFla » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:42 pm

Weatherfreak000 wrote:Ike looks incredible. Should without question be Cat 3 at 10PM.


That CDO and mini eye are pretty similar to Caribbean monsters instead of GOM storms...



I thought it was bombing out last night. There was so much convection around the eye. It should be a Cat 3 already! Or maybe even stronger. Hopefully, there is no intesification just before landfall. Ughh.



CapeVerde.... I bought one of those million candle power flashlights just for that reason.
Last edited by DanKellFla on Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ixolib
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2741
Age: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8062 Postby Ixolib » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:43 pm

terrapintransit wrote:Pressure down to 942.5 mb :eek: :eek:

So, what's the "rate of drop" for the day? How much drop vs. how much time elapsed?
0 likes   

Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2776
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8063 Postby Frank P » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:43 pm

Cape Verde wrote:The thing I hate most about this storm is that it will make landfall at night. A big hurricane is scary during the day when you can see the debris headed toward your house.

At night, you're tired and can't see squat. All you can do is hear. And when the power goes out, you're really on your own.

That's what this is setting up to be.

And the affected ones, like I expect to be, won't be able to get into this forum for any information. It's not a good feeling.


good point.. I am convinced had Katrina hit at night the death toll along the MS coast would be been much much much higher... I experienced Camille at night and it was quite terrifying ...
0 likes   

User avatar
amawea
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 385
Age: 73
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 3:36 pm
Location: Horseshoe Bend, Ar. but from Baytown, Tx

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8064 Postby amawea » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:43 pm

I absolutely do not understand the thinking on that Texas City advice to stay put. They state Ike is going into the Matagorda Bay area like it's eched in stone.
Are they crazy!!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
Cape Verde
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 564
Age: 69
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:53 pm
Location: Houston area

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8065 Postby Cape Verde » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:44 pm

nolecaster wrote:Super, super, super low pressure with no winds. Mind-boggling.

When are these winds going to catch up? They've been lagging way behind since he's first touched Cuba.


I think I can speak for about 4 million people who hope they never do.
0 likes   

User avatar
amawea
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 385
Age: 73
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 3:36 pm
Location: Horseshoe Bend, Ar. but from Baytown, Tx

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8066 Postby amawea » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:44 pm

Post to add that even if it does go to Matagorda I wouldn't want to remain in Texas City!
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8067 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:46 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Ixolib
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2741
Age: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8068 Postby Ixolib » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:46 pm

Frank P wrote:I experienced Camille at night and it was quite terrifying ...
Ditto!! Of course I was only 12 in Camille. In Katrina, I/we (sorry Frank!!) was "way older" but not terrified, just simply dumbfounded!! Numb comes to mind...
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8069 Postby dhweather » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:46 pm

amawea wrote:I absolutely do not understand the thinking on that Texas City advice to stay put. They state Ike is going into the Matagorda Bay area like it's eched in stone.
Are they crazy!!!!


Obviously, they are. Ike has a huge windfield, his pressure is dropping, the entire Texas coast is under a Hurricane Watch and will likely be under a warning tomorrow. Last minute jogs (see Charley) represent why large areas are placed under warnings.
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8070 Postby MiamiensisWx » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:47 pm

Cape Verde wrote:I think I can speak for about 4 million people who hope they never do.

Unfortunately, the large wind radii will still produce a very significant surge in excess of +15-20 feet in some localized locations, regardless of the exact maximum sustained winds at landfall. As Ike intensifies to a major hurricane, the surge may even be larger, even if it weakens significantly prior to landfall. As Katrina and others demonstrated, the surge doesn't decrease if a large wind radii is present.
Last edited by MiamiensisWx on Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Senobia
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 278
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8071 Postby Senobia » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:48 pm

Dang. From what HURAKAN just posted, it looks like the NE side of Ike is gonna rake southern LA before it hits Texas. :eek:
Last edited by Senobia on Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8072 Postby x-y-no » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:48 pm

amawea wrote:I absolutely do not understand the thinking on that Texas City advice to stay put. They state Ike is going into the Matagorda Bay area like it's eched in stone.
Are they crazy!!!!


Assuming that statement was genuine, they clearly spoke too definitively too early. I did check their website and it does not have any recent updates. They do mention a text message notification system. The statement may have come from that.

I would say to anyone in that area that they should not take that as the final word on whether to evacuate.
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#8073 Postby dhweather » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:48 pm

Over in the recon thread, pressure has dropped 5 mb in one hour. That's not a good thing.

942.5mb now.
Last edited by dhweather on Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Annie Oakley
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 12:54 pm
Location: Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8074 Postby Annie Oakley » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:49 pm

HURAKAN wrote:Image


Quite beautiful!
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8075 Postby Wx_Warrior » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:50 pm

Sabine Pass, Tx, now under voluntary @ 6am Thursday morning.
0 likes   

User avatar
lisa0825
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 120
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:05 pm
Location: Texas City

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8076 Postby lisa0825 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:50 pm

dhweather wrote:
amawea wrote:I absolutely do not understand the thinking on that Texas City advice to stay put. They state Ike is going into the Matagorda Bay area like it's eched in stone.
Are they crazy!!!!


Obviously, they are. Ike has a huge windfield, his pressure is dropping, the entire Texas coast is under a Hurricane Watch and will likely be under a warning tomorrow. Last minute jogs (see Charley) represent why large areas are placed under warnings.


I was shocked by the message from Texas City too. I haven't decided yet. I will decide in the morning, and it won't be based on my town's emergency management's opinion. I get better info here for sure! I have my supplies and plywood ready to go.

What I dread most if I decide to evacuate is that I have foster kitties that were feral until tamed, and I am afraid they will revert back to feral if traumatized. I really don't want to have to capture them and get them into cages if I can avoid it, but I certainly won't put us all in danger due to that fear. I'm watching this site, the forecasts, and the models very closely.
0 likes   

User avatar
Melly
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 16
Age: 43
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 6:56 pm
Location: Port Neches, Texas (Southeast Texas)
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8077 Postby Melly » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:51 pm

dhweather wrote:
amawea wrote:I absolutely do not understand the thinking on that Texas City advice to stay put. They state Ike is going into the Matagorda Bay area like it's eched in stone.
Are they crazy!!!!


Obviously, they are. Ike has a huge windfield, his pressure is dropping, the entire Texas coast is under a Hurricane Watch and will likely be under a warning tomorrow. Last minute jogs (see Charley) represent why large areas are placed under warnings.


The weather channel keeps screaming at me they we are under a Hurricane Watch, but like you I'm sure we will be under a warning tomorrow...

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145347
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8078 Postby cycloneye » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:51 pm

The 00:00 UTC Shear forecast from SHIP just came out and is good for Ike to go ahead and continue to intensify as shear will be low.

Code: Select all

SHEAR (KTS)        9     8    10     5     8    11     8     7     1     9    37    48    66


ftp://ftp.tpc.ncep.noaa.gov/atcf/stext/ ... _ships.txt
0 likes   

User avatar
Bunkertor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3397
Joined: Tue May 09, 2006 3:48 pm

#8079 Postby Bunkertor » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:51 pm

Now i get it :lol:
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8080 Postby MiamiensisWx » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:51 pm

MiamiensisWx wrote:
Cape Verde wrote:I think I can speak for about 4 million people who hope they never do.

Unfortunately, the large wind radii will still produce a very significant surge in excess of +15-20 feet in some localized locations, regardless of the exact maximum sustained winds at landfall. As Ike intensifies to a major hurricane, the surge may even be larger, even if it weakens significantly prior to landfall. As Katrina and others demonstrated, the surge doesn't decrease if a large wind radii is present.

Personally, it is becoming increasingly clear that storm surge heights solidly greater than 20 feet are likely in some locales. Of course, the wide swath of strong TS and Cat 1/2 winds is damaging as well.
Last edited by MiamiensisWx on Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests