ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#8141 Postby Dean4Storms » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:26 pm

Isn't there another thread for all this preparation discussion????????????????
0 likes   

rockyman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1967
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:24 pm
Location: Dauphin Island, AL

#8142 Postby rockyman » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:29 pm

Ike is having wide-reaching impacts...Here on Dauphin Island, parts of the West End are already underwater and the worst is yet to come. Below is a water-level map for 3 points along the Alabama coast. The West End of the Island starts flooding at 2 feet and my yard will be wet if/when the water reaches 4 feet (which it might before morning):

Image
0 likes   

pojo
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 8016
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:16 pm
Location: Houston

Re: ATL IKE: Recon Discussion

#8143 Postby pojo » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:30 pm

cycloneye wrote:Anyone knows why the Air Force identifies the flight as=AF303 2009A IKE1 That number 1 besides the name.

because the ARWO had to restart the mission... normally its AF304 1709A IKE... if something happens with the computer or the ground station we have to restart the mission so it would be AF304 1709A IKE1
0 likes   

User avatar
terrapintransit
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 275
Age: 50
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 8:08 pm
Location: Williamsport, Pa

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8144 Postby terrapintransit » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:30 pm

Pressure still falling....941.6 extrapolated
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#8145 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:31 pm

Texans, storm surge will be a huge problem. Hurricane winds extend
115 miles from the center and tropical storm winds 205 miles from the center
based on Jeff L. and NHC. Tampa Bay had a tidal rise of 3 feet flooding
my back yard and putting many roads under water in low lying areas, and we
are 400 MILES AWAY from the center.

IT IS THE RADIUS OF TROPICAL STORM/HURRICANE force winds that will
determine surge. Only a very small area will see Category 4 winds,
probably right at the coast, but the surge will be the issue here.

Now if the eye becomes larger due to an eyewall replacement cycle,
then surge is still a massive problem and wind also becomes a bigger problem.
0 likes   

pablolopez26
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 137
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 5:10 pm

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8146 Postby pablolopez26 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:33 pm

Jeff Masters is live right now...

http://www.hurricanecity.com/live.htm

I have a lot of respect for him.
0 likes   

User avatar
TampaFl
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1904
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 11:23 am
Location: Tampa, FL

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8147 Postby TampaFl » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:34 pm

A good explanation of the blocking ridge was done by S2K's own analyst don sutherland in the TA forum:

viewtopic.php?f=29&t=103074&p=1821781#p1821781[/quote]


Thanks Tolakram - did not see that earlier - will check it out.

Robert 8-)
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29112
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re: Re:

#8148 Postby vbhoutex » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:35 pm

jinftl wrote:No demeaning, no name calling....but that does not mean the observation can not be raised...esp by those in the 'thick of it'....that this type of scenario should have been practiced, synchronized, analyzed, and reviewed by city,county, state officials. There is no reason that things should be helter-skelter at this point if that was done. Only the residents in the path can really tell us that.

Annie Oakley wrote:Everybody! Cut it out! The demeaning of the local authorities etc. There seems to be a trend here to cause dissention berween the people and the authorites-this has to stop! This is the time for everyone in Texas to band together and use their collective heads-do NOT let dissention reign among the ranks. The trend on this board in attitude towards authorities is going south...whoever is propagating this needs to stop right now and give people back their dignity-Texans just carry on and do what you do best..we will get through this and we will help each other-you other panic-mongers need to disperse.


Nothing is helter skelter here in Texas that I am aware of. At this point it all appears to be a well oiled machine that is constantly in motion. Things are much different than the panic that happened with Rita evacs. Some may disagree with when certain things are being done and some probably have no idea what all is being done and is in motion already. Making blanket statements that these officials do not know what they are doing are wrong, plain and simple. Will it all go smoothly? Maybe not, it usually doesn't all work as planned but there are many things in place including contingency plans I am sure.
0 likes   

txag2005
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 229
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:16 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8149 Postby txag2005 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:37 pm

This whole thing seems unreal to me. Massive pressure drop, hurricane force winds that stretch out 100+ miles and hardly any evacuations. I've already made the move to North Houston, but I'm very nervous for the rest of the people in our rather large storm surge zones in Galveston/Harris Counties. At least Brazoria County got a full mandatory evacuation.

I don't see most Houston businesses closed before Friday, and they predict TS force winds during the day Friday.

I really wish this wasn't happening.....
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8150 Postby tolakram » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:37 pm

For those fretting that Ike is going too far north please double check the sat views.

loop:
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t4/loop-ir4.html

Image

Looks pretty close to me.
0 likes   

User avatar
CypressMike
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8151 Postby CypressMike » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:39 pm

txag2005 wrote:This whole thing seems unreal to me. Massive pressure drop, hurricane force winds that stretch out 100+ miles and hardly any evacuations. I've already made the move to North Houston, but I'm very nervous for the rest of the people in our rather large storm surge zones in Galveston/Harris Counties. At least Brazoria County got a full mandatory evacuation.

I don't see most Houston businesses closed before Friday, and they predict TS force winds during the day Friday.

I really wish this wasn't happening.....


I think this entirely intentional. They are slowly ramping up the rhetoric in strategic locations to prevent mass hysteria and huge traffic back-ups. I think they'll get the folks out in time...but just in time. I think they did the same thing in New Orleans for Gustav and it worked great.
0 likes   

User avatar
Janie2006
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1329
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: coastal Ms aka home of the hurricanes

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8152 Postby Janie2006 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:40 pm

Ike is also expanding, so to speak, so there will be the "optical illusions" to watch for as the hurricane chugs into the central Gulf.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ixolib
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2741
Age: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re:

#8153 Postby Ixolib » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:40 pm

dhweather wrote:After Katrina, I reviewed all of the hurricanes that had reached category five intensity in the Gulf. Regardless of intensity at landfall, all but one had a storm surge typical of category five heights.

Please remember this if you are in a low lying area.

EXCELLENT POINT, David... If folks could seriously get a grip on this very concept, that would make all the difference in the world. Low lying, or even up to 30', this is a very real issue that I believe many don't get. I surely didn't "get it" before Katrina, but surely do now. And, given the size of Ike, this will be even more evident at landfall than a much smaller major - say like Camille!!

IF ANYONE HAS QUESTIONS ABOUT SURGE/STORM SIZE/LANDFALL IMPACT, just ask any of us from the MS coast who were there on 08/29/05. We'll be happy to pass on our experiences....
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8154 Postby Dean4Storms » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:42 pm

tolakram wrote:For those fretting that Ike is going too far north please double check the sat views.

loop:
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t4/loop-ir4.html

Image

Looks pretty close to me.


That is an old pic, it is NW of that location in that pic.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145337
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8155 Postby cycloneye » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:42 pm

Lets stay on the topic of Ike and not stray into Texas who does what or not.
0 likes   

6SpeedTA95
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1206
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 3:25 pm
Location: Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8156 Postby 6SpeedTA95 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:43 pm

Dean4Storms wrote:
tolakram wrote:For those fretting that Ike is going too far north please double check the sat views.

loop:
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t4/loop-ir4.html

Image

Looks pretty close to me.


That is an old pic, it is NW of that location in that pic.

The timestamp isn't that old, about an hour.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#8157 Postby RL3AO » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:44 pm

Looking at recon and satellite, it appears that it might be starting to move WNW.
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#8158 Postby Dean4Storms » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:44 pm

I'm looking at a 01:15 pic
0 likes   

txag2005
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 229
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:16 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8159 Postby txag2005 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:45 pm

CypressMike wrote:
txag2005 wrote:This whole thing seems unreal to me. Massive pressure drop, hurricane force winds that stretch out 100+ miles and hardly any evacuations. I've already made the move to North Houston, but I'm very nervous for the rest of the people in our rather large storm surge zones in Galveston/Harris Counties. At least Brazoria County got a full mandatory evacuation.

I don't see most Houston businesses closed before Friday, and they predict TS force winds during the day Friday.

I really wish this wasn't happening.....


I think this entirely intentional. They are slowly ramping up the rhetoric in strategic locations to prevent mass hysteria and huge traffic back-ups. I think they'll get the folks out in time...but just in time. I think they did the same thing in New Orleans for Gustav and it worked great.


That's a great point, as I just checked the Houston metro area traffic maps and everything is clear except for some areas near downtown (prob due to construction). I believe around this time during Rita, the roads were already gridlocked.

That said, it still doesn't help calm the nerves. My only concern with slow or lacking evacs is most businesses will not follow suit until those decisions are made. School and work can keep someone who feels they need to leave from being able that. That's my main concern. Other than that, I agree with what they doing if it helps avoid gridlock and we can ensure coastal areas are evacuated accordingly.
0 likes   

User avatar
Weatherfreak14
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1383
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 3:40 pm
Location: Beaufort, SC
Contact:

Re:

#8160 Postby Weatherfreak14 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:45 pm

RL3AO wrote:Looking at recon and satellite, it appears that it might be starting to move WNW.


I agree, it looks like it is starting to move to the WNW ever so slowly.... It maybe a wobble but i doubt it.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests