ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
wicked_wx_watcher
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 53
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 12:56 pm
Location: Clear Lake City/Webster, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8261 Postby wicked_wx_watcher » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:47 pm

Currently, the only thing happening in Jefferson County is the voluntary evac of Sabine Pass and other low lying areas. We did hear a rumor however that a mandatory evac for SETX could be called as early as 6:00AM tomorrow. Some area businesses and trade schools closed early today based on that info. On the other hand, my son had football practice this afternoon so go figure.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8262 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:48 pm

LSU2001 wrote:
bayoubebe wrote:
SMNederlandTX wrote:TWC just said Ike is moving NNW....I thought someone on here said he was moving WNW?


ugh-oh, NNW?? How will this effect the LA. coast now?


They must have screwed up and said NNW meaning WNW. At best it is heading slightly north of WNW to South of Northwest. There is absolutly no indication of a NNW motion. IMHO.
Tim



Don't you love the TWC? I miss John Hope.
0 likes   

Senobia
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 278
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8263 Postby Senobia » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:48 pm

Wx_Warrior wrote:It's getting scary in the Golden Triangle....Nothing organized as of yet, schools are still on for tomorrow. EMO is telling people they don't have to resources to get them out and this could be a "go or stay if you want to" type deal tomorrow.


Okay, are you posting links to this stuff? You've been popping in and out with bits and pieces of info..none of which I have heard before.

I know you're in the media to some degree (I forget to which), but where can other people go to hear what you're hearing?
0 likes   

User avatar
Ixolib
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2741
Age: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8264 Postby Ixolib » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:48 pm

MiamiensisWx wrote:
Ixolib wrote:
jinftl wrote:Skyscrapers in Ft. Lauderdale had their windows blown out from sustained borderline cat 1/2 winds in Wilma. I'd hate to see the result of Houston's dealing with even marginal cat 3 winds.
Fortunately, though, the damage was superficial - not structural. Quick and easy to fix. Looks bad - and would BE bad if you get sliced by a piece of falling glass.

Generally speaking, structures "closer to the ground" do just fine in most cases, even in cat 3/4 winds. Sure, they take a hit with the wind, but for the most part, they remain structurally sound. Again, quick and easy to fix. This, of course, is not including tornados and mini-vortices. With those, all bets are off!!

But surge is a whole different beast. Not quick to fix, not easy to fix, renders most structures it enters to be inhabitable, and often times, condemed.

While Wilma did her deed, much of her damage was not to a point where it rendered dwellings "structurally" impaired because her impact was primarily wind only. If surge had been an issue with Wilma, she'd still be in the news today!!!

Hide from the wind, but run from the water...

Andrew, Hugo, Dean, Felix, and Janet survivors would beg to differ with that statement if they resided in poorly constructed structures. Keep in mind that the costs for replacements/addendums due to wind damage (including broken windows, lost tiles, etc.) are significant as well.

I've always wondered why people who choose to live in hurricane prone areas think it's okay to live in poorly constructed structures. Kinda goes with my thinking on those who choose to live in hurricane prone areas that are already below sea level.

I'm not saying wind damage isn't expensive to recover from - at least from the homeowner's perspective. I'm simply saying it's generaly not a "life changing" event like surge is.

I'll bet there were pool enclosures that were destroyed during Wilma that netted a pretty good return from the insurance companys for some!!! I mean, there are some pool enclosures in Miami/Dade that cost enough for me to build a whole house and live comfortably ever after!!
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#8265 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:49 pm

New advisory out....still south of Houston.
0 likes   

User avatar
gboudx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4080
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:39 pm
Location: Rockwall, Tx but from Harvey, La

#8266 Postby gboudx » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:49 pm

Just in from Jeff.
Mandatory Evacuation Order for all evac. zones in Brazoria County at 800am Thursday.

Mandatory Evacuation Orders for areas S of I-35 in Matagorda County.

Mandatory Evacuation Order for W end Galveston, Bolivar, Kemah, Dickinson, and other low lying areas of Galveston County starting at 800am Thursday.

All Tolls are waived on all Harris County Toll Roads
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

Re:

#8267 Postby dwg71 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:50 pm

Stormcenter wrote:New advisory out....still south of Houston.

not by much
0 likes   

User avatar
Emmett_Brown
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1432
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Sarasota FL

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8268 Postby Emmett_Brown » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:50 pm

Last few images on IR show what looks like some shear eating into the W half of the storm again, like this morning. Also, looks like he has slowed again.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: Re:

#8269 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:50 pm

O Town wrote:
HarlequinBoy wrote:
deltadog03 wrote:If that steering is right it will have to move generally NW.....Thats why I havn't changed my map for landfall yet....



Where is your map? I'd like to see it.


Thanks!

Maybe hes speaking of this one.


viewtopic.php?f=29&t=103095



One pro-met who keeps Texas on the weak side, anyway.
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8270 Postby MiamiensisWx » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:50 pm

MiamiensisWx wrote:
Ixolib wrote:Fortunately, though, the damage was superficial - not structural. Quick and easy to fix. Looks bad - and would BE bad if you get sliced by a piece of falling glass.

Generally speaking, structures "closer to the ground" do just fine in most cases, even in cat 3/4 winds. Sure, they take a hit with the wind, but for the most part, they remain structurally sound. Again, quick and easy to fix. This, of course, is not including tornados and mini-vortices. With those, all bets are off!!

But surge is a whole different beast. Not quick to fix, not easy to fix, renders most structures it enters to be inhabitable, and often times, condemed.

While Wilma did her deed, much of her damage was not to a point where it rendered dwellings "structurally" impaired because her impact was primarily wind only. If surge had been an issue with Wilma, she'd still be in the news today!!!

Hide from the wind, but run from the water...

Andrew, Hugo, Dean, Felix, and Janet survivors would beg to differ with that statement if they resided in poorly constructed structures. Even well constructed structures received wind damage during these TCs, though they remained intact during the ordeals. Keep in mind that the costs for replacements/addendums due to wind damage (including broken windows, lost tiles, etc.) are significant as well.

I think it is dangerous to downplay surge AND wind... strong TS/Cat 1 winds can cause significant structural damage to unsound/poorly constructed buildings/residences.

Corozal Town, Belize after the eyewall of Hurricane Janet in 1955:

http://www.northernbelize.com/grc/hist_recent05.jpg

Lakes by the Bay (poorly attached roofs) after Hurricane Andrew's eyewall near Homestead, Florida in 1992:

http://1-22infantry.org/history/andrew2.jpg

The Wilma photographs from Fort Lauderdale are valid as well...

Thanks for the response.
0 likes   

User avatar
MHurricanes
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 102
Age: 73
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 2:05 pm
Location: Altamonte Springs, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8271 Postby MHurricanes » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:52 pm

superdeluxe wrote:
MHurricanes wrote:
terrapintransit wrote:Pressure 940.5..........


During a live interview a few minutes ago on HurricaneCity.com, Jeff Masters said there's a 30 to 50 percent chance that Ike will continue to strengthen all the way to landfall. He said the "Wilma-like" storm is so large that it will probably shield itself from any shear or dry air that might try to weaken it prior to landfall.

- MHurricanes



MH, i know you said this was live, but is there a archived link to this on his website?




Jeff is no longer being interviewed, but the host is providing is plenty of the latest information about Ike.
0 likes   

Javlin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1620
Age: 64
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 7:58 pm
Location: ms gulf coast

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8272 Postby Javlin » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:52 pm

MiamiensisWx wrote:
Ixolib wrote:
jinftl wrote:Skyscrapers in Ft. Lauderdale had their windows blown out from sustained borderline cat 1/2 winds in Wilma. I'd hate to see the result of Houston's dealing with even marginal cat 3 winds.
Fortunately, though, the damage was superficial - not structural. Quick and easy to fix. Looks bad - and would BE bad if you get sliced by a piece of falling glass.

Generally speaking, structures "closer to the ground" do just fine in most cases, even in cat 3/4 winds. Sure, they take a hit with the wind, but for the most part, they remain structurally sound. Again, quick and easy to fix. This, of course, is not including tornados and mini-vortices. With those, all bets are off!!

But surge is a whole different beast. Not quick to fix, not easy to fix, renders most structures it enters to be inhabitable, and often times, condemed.

While Wilma did her deed, much of her damage was not to a point where it rendered dwellings "structurally" impaired because her impact was primarily wind only. If surge had been an issue with Wilma, she'd still be in the news today!!!

Hide from the wind, but run from the water...

Andrew, Hugo, Dean, Felix, and Janet survivors would beg to differ with that statement if they resided in poorly constructed structures. Even well constructed structures received wind damage during these TCs, though they remained intact during the ordeals. Keep in mind that the costs for replacements/addendums due to wind damage (including broken windows, lost tiles, etc.) are significant as well.

I think it is dangerous to downplay surge AND wind... strong TS/Cat 1 winds can cause significant structural damage to unsound/poorly constructed buildings/residences.


A true Cat 5 will wipe out just about anything But Ixolib and I have been through camille to katrina on the coast and water KILLS and we are talking about better constructed homes here.
0 likes   

Senobia
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 278
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8273 Postby Senobia » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:53 pm

Ixolib wrote:I've always wondered why people who choose to live in hurricane prone areas think it's okay to live in poorly constructed structures. Kinda goes with my thinking on those who choose to live in hurricane prone areas that are already below sea level.


Choose your wording carefully. Some of us were born here of no fault of our own..and have not yet been afforded with the opportunity in life to move on to points on higher ground.

Further, some of us have not been afforded with the opportunity in life to live in newly constructed mega-homes made of materials with the highest safety rating.

Some of us are forced to do the best we can with what we have where we are..which isn't much.
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8274 Postby MiamiensisWx » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:54 pm

Javlin wrote:A true Cat 5 will wipe out just about anything But Ixolib and I have been through camille to katrina on the coast and water KILLS and we are talking about better constructed homes here.

I certainly agree with you and Ixolib in regards to surge... I have emphasized the surge threat in preceding posts. I was merely emphasizing that wind damage is significant (in different ways) as well - I experienced Wilma and other TCs in SE FL...
0 likes   

User avatar
gboudx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4080
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:39 pm
Location: Rockwall, Tx but from Harvey, La

#8275 Postby gboudx » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:54 pm

10pm update from jeff.

viewtopic.php?f=29&t=103096&p=1823418#p1823418

He says 80-100mph sustained in Harris. Surge levels increased above earlier estimates.
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#8276 Postby deltadog03 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:55 pm

0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re:

#8277 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:55 pm

deltadog03 wrote:the weakness is STILLL there....

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic2/real ... oom=&time=



It's not going to happen.
0 likes   

User avatar
SMNederlandTX
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 57
Age: 50
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 7:02 pm
Location: Nederland, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8278 Postby SMNederlandTX » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:56 pm

Jim Cantore just said it was moving NW at 7mph on TWC.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8279 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:56 pm

SMNederlandTX wrote:Jim Cantore just said it was moving NW at 7mph on TWC.



That's the NHC info.
0 likes   

User avatar
SMNederlandTX
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 57
Age: 50
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 7:02 pm
Location: Nederland, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#8280 Postby SMNederlandTX » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:58 pm

Yes, that is where he said it came from.....it slowed down, didn't it? Thought it was at 8mph at the last update.

Stormcenter wrote:
SMNederlandTX wrote:Jim Cantore just said it was moving NW at 7mph on TWC.



That's the NHC info.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests