ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
bob rulz
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1704
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: Re:

#9201 Postby bob rulz » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:48 pm

Brent wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:looks like the never ending EWRC may FINALLY be ending


Nice to hear from a pro. This storm has been confusing me for days.


You and everyone else.

So my understanding is that this will weaken slightly in the short term but once the inner eyewall has completely collapsed it will start to strengthen again right?

I mean, that's how it usually works in an EWRC but this is a very strange storm and I'm getting conflicted reports...
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20012
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9202 Postby tolakram » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:48 pm

It appears convection is trying to wrap around now. If the plane entered from the NW then the missing inner wind max might be explained by this.

The arrow indicates motion on the loop, not pointing at anything.

Image
Last edited by tolakram on Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
gboudx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4080
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:39 pm
Location: Rockwall, Tx but from Harvey, La

#9203 Postby gboudx » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:48 pm

Question for a pro. I'd put this on the TA Forum thread, but no pro's appear to be reading it.

Is Lowell "fighting" off the trough that is building south through Cali? Help me understand what this water vapor map is showing me.

http://www.weather.gov/sat_loop.php?image=wv&hours=6
0 likes   

User avatar
Raider Power
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 45
Age: 60
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 4:20 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9204 Postby Raider Power » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:48 pm

Txdivermom wrote:
Cape Verde wrote:Local television is showing massive traffic backups trying to exit Galveston. The inbound lanes are still inbound and there are people driving into Galveston. I don't know what they're thinking, because I don't think there is enough time to get back out. They need to open the contraflow lanes right now.



I think contra flow was only supposed to start a little before Conroe. That wont help this. I -45 outside my window (near Little York) is moving well.


Contraflowing the lanes right now coming out of Galveston would be a bad idea. People are leaving work early to get to their homes for final prep and remember it is not just Galveston where people are headed to for preparations. They are going to Friendswood, Clear Lake, Webster, etc. To contraflow now would be to divert a massive amount of traffic to local roads and would cause a great deal of problems. Contraflow will now be best to do around 6 PM I think.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re:

#9205 Postby KWT » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:49 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:looks like the never ending EWRC may FINALLY be ending


Yep this confirms there:

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... hr_24.html

What bad timing, its already got the huge surge and for it to ramp up now would give it little time for any structual changes to wekaen it... :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
zaqxsw75050
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 4:21 pm
Location: Hong Kong

Re:

#9206 Postby zaqxsw75050 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:52 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:looks like the never ending EWRC may FINALLY be ending


Correct if I am wrong, but is that mean Ike will start to take off in intensity?
0 likes   

bob rulz
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1704
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: Re:

#9207 Postby bob rulz » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:53 pm

zaqxsw75050 wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:looks like the never ending EWRC may FINALLY be ending


Correct if I am wrong, but is that mean Ike will start to take off in intensity?


After this brief stabilization/weakening period I would assume that's the forecast.
0 likes   

rainman
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 8:42 am
Location: Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9208 Postby rainman » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:54 pm

intensification is likely if indeed the EWRC is ending
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#9209 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:55 pm

Dropsonde supports an intensity increase to 90 kt.
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9210 Postby clfenwi » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:56 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
clfenwi wrote:
Ptarmigan wrote:Is Hurricane Ike the lowest pressure that is not a major hurricane since it has a central pressure of 944 mb and 100 mph winds?


Gloria of 1985 had 944 mb and 80 kt (and slightly later had 944/85 like Ike does now)

http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/atl ... /track.dat

Wilma before the plunge was 945/95

http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/atl ... /track.dat

Only other comparable situation I could find was Gilbert coming off the Yucatan, 949/90, 950/85, but went on to be 25 knots stronger with only a slight drop in pressure .

http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/atl ... /track.dat


That 945/95 from Wilma was a mere guess before the jaw dropper came in so it was most likely wrong - it was 954/85 then tumbled to 901/130 at next report (so it was likely about 925/115 at that advisory). Gloria was likely 942/90 at NC landfall. Also Katrina was as low as 940 during the ERC with a generous 100 kt (not supported by any Recon).


Good points all.

RE Wilma, what is on the Unisys website is what the advisory info was at that time, the official report shows 946/130 at that time, so scratch Wilma from that list.

And indeed, when Katrina was at 940 mb during the ERC, it was satellite estimates that propped up the intensity of 100 kts, not recon (see http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/di ... .017.shtml?)
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#9211 Postby RL3AO » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:56 pm

FWIW, the VDM center is about 13 miles right of forecast track.
0 likes   

User avatar
Lowpressure
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2032
Age: 58
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 9:17 am
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina

Re:

#9212 Postby Lowpressure » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:57 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:Dropsonde supports an intensity increase to 90 kt.

The pressure is so low, you would think the wind has to catch up at some point and it may happen rather quickly, unfortunately.
0 likes   

Txdivermom
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:49 am

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9213 Postby Txdivermom » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:57 pm

Nexus wrote:
lys3rg0 wrote:
Cape Verde wrote:Local television is showing massive traffic backups trying to exit Galveston. The inbound lanes are still inbound and there are people driving into Galveston. I don't know what they're thinking, because I don't think there is enough time to get back out. They need to open the contraflow lanes right now.


Anyone got that Galveston exit traffic camera link bookmarked? I seem to have lost it... it was posted around page 400 some hours ago...


Yes:

http://traffic.houstontranstar.org/cctv ... IH-45_Gulf


And choose Tiki Island or 71st to get near the causeway. Tiki Island is looking at the causeway.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38095
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9214 Postby Brent » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:57 pm

IKE HAS MADE A SMALL JOG TO THE NORTHWEST OVER THE PAST FEW
HOURS
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re:

#9215 Postby KWT » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:58 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:Dropsonde supports an intensity increase to 90 kt.


Yep found 89kts, so indeed the winds should be upped to 90kts, looks like Ike is ever so slowly strengthening right now but if the inner issues are getting sorted out then this will strengthen faster.
0 likes   

User avatar
amawea
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 385
Age: 73
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 3:36 pm
Location: Horseshoe Bend, Ar. but from Baytown, Tx

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9216 Postby amawea » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:58 pm

I see very little dry air ahead of Ike, especially in Texas. The moisture from the Pacific tropical system is coming in over Texas.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t4/loop-wv.html
0 likes   

rtd2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 12:45 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: Re:

#9217 Postby rtd2 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:58 pm

Lowpressure wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:Dropsonde supports an intensity increase to 90 kt.

The pressure is so low, you would think the wind has to catch up at some point and it may happen rather quickly, unfortunately.




pressure has been on the rise last few recons

URNT12 KNHC 111749
VORTEX DATA MESSAGE AL092008
A. 11/17:21:30Z
B. 25 deg 47 min N
088 deg 43 min W
C. 700 mb 2705 m
D. 55 kt
E. 307 deg 98 nm
F. 058 deg 075 kt
G. 306 deg 087 nm
H. 953 mb
I. 10 C/ 3049 m
J. 16 C/ 3040 m
K. 16 C/ NA
L. OPEN NW
M. C8
N. 12345/7
O. 0.02 / 3 nm
P. AF303 2709A IKE OB 06
MAX FL WIND 75 KT NW QUAD 16:56:10 Z
MAX FL TEMP 17 C, 302 / 50NM
MAX OUTBOUND AMD MAX FL WIND 87 KT SE QUAD 1732Z
SFC CNTR WITHIN 5NM OF FL CNTR

8 nm eyewall open NW side. No mention of an outer eyewall.
0 likes   

shawn67
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 143
Age: 58
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 3:03 pm
Location: Fresno, CA

Re:

#9218 Postby shawn67 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:59 pm

RL3AO wrote:FWIW, the VDM center is about 13 miles right of forecast track.


Doesnt a repositioning of the eye often occur as these ERC conclude?

The eye is dead...long live the eye :(
0 likes   

Txdivermom
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:49 am

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9219 Postby Txdivermom » Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:00 pm

Raider Power wrote:
Txdivermom wrote:
Cape Verde wrote:Local television is showing massive traffic backups trying to exit Galveston. The inbound lanes are still inbound and there are people driving into Galveston. I don't know what they're thinking, because I don't think there is enough time to get back out. They need to open the contraflow lanes right now.



I think contra flow was only supposed to start a little before Conroe. That wont help this. I -45 outside my window (near Little York) is moving well.


Contraflowing the lanes right now coming out of Galveston would be a bad idea. People are leaving work early to get to their homes for final prep and remember it is not just Galveston where people are headed to for preparations. They are going to Friendswood, Clear Lake, Webster, etc. To contraflow now would be to divert a massive amount of traffic to local roads and would cause a great deal of problems. Contraflow will now be best to do around 6 PM I think.


I totally agree with you. Everything seems to be moving really well right now, I think. And starting contra flow to the north is the right thing to do. Some people may only be going to stay with someone in N Houston. If contra is opened, they will have to travel far up the interstate.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9220 Postby KWT » Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:02 pm

Brent wrote:IKE HAS MADE A SMALL JOG TO THE NORTHWEST OVER THE PAST FEW
HOURS


Not good for the Galveston region given every jog is starting to make a difference in terms of eventual landfall, hopefully that trend corrects itself.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest