ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Pebbles
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1994
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 1:42 pm
Location: New Lenox, IL (SW of Chicago)

#9621 Postby Pebbles » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:02 pm

I'm looking at the current sat loops and thinking there's an awefully lot of dry air getting pulled in there and I was thinking this was suppose to ease up. Any Met's care to comment? Is that indeed dry air? Where's it coming from? Anything that makes you think it will continue or discontinue over the next 24hours?

Edit: Last frame of loops i was looking at.
Image
Last edited by Pebbles on Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9622 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:02 pm

64 nm Southn of Dauphin, AL.

Image


My gut is Ike doesn't get much stronger, but with seas like that so far from the center, and the coast road South of San Luis Pass in Brazoria County already impassable, it really doesn't need to get any stronger. I'm also hearing second hand from our pumper near Gueydan that water is at LA 14 in places.


I'd evacuate if I was in an evacuation zone...
0 likes   

User avatar
angelwing
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4462
Age: 64
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 3:06 pm
Location: Kulpsville, PA

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9623 Postby angelwing » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:03 pm

Ok, my friend lives 50 miles from the coast south of interstate 10 and he has told me he's not leaving...is it going to reach him? Al he has told me is that he is expecting winds but I am worried about storm surge and he is being stubborn and is going to stay...I have no clue about the layout there, so am I worrying for nothing?
0 likes   

fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9624 Postby fasterdisaster » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:04 pm

Txdivermom wrote:Andrew was so costly because it hit both FL and LA. It did some pretty major damage in LA in addition to FL. (and yes, I know FL was devasted, but this awful storm double dipped)


I think only 1B of the 26B was from Louisiana though (not saying it wasn't bad in LA!)
0 likes   

Rod Hagen
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 237
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 6:22 am
Location: Lives in Melbourne, works in N Queensland

#9625 Postby Rod Hagen » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:04 pm

From the visual loop at http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t4/loop-vis.html it certainly seems to have turned more to the west again. Pretty much running along 26ºN in fact.
0 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneQueen
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1011
Age: 79
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:36 pm
Location: No. Naples, Fl (Vanderbilt Beach area)

Re:

#9626 Postby HurricaneQueen » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:05 pm

Annie Oakley wrote:We have incoming surge, rainfall and lots of tree and powerline
damage...why people would want to stay is beyond me. Except maybe they don't think their animals will be okay? They really need to be in touch with the local emergency coordinators who have prepped for situations like these and who have the full financial and logistic support of the State and Federal governments. Call 211 and express your concern! The Texas Governor's Office of Emergency Management has stated that they will 'leave nobody behind'. If you don't let someone know what you need then they cannot be there for you. Call 211 or 311 Texans! We are down to 16 hours or so...



Well said, Annie. Unfortunately, in here we are preaching to the choir. I don't pretend to know what kind of public announcements are being made in TX and LA but I would think (hope) they would be getting the most important implications and the seriousness of the situation facing them out to the general public. I understand to a certain extent the complacency and denial. This is made more complicated if they have pets who would not do well if separated from their owners. Unfortunately, if they stay in high risk areas they may find themselves separated only to come together on "rainbow bridge".

Both fear and ignorance are great paralyzers and I suppose many are suffering from one or both. IMHO, very strong language from the highest authorities is needed to try to get through to those who are risking all by not leaving.

My thoughts and prayers are with ALL who may suffer the devastating effects of Ike.

Lynn

Sorry for OT but this is where my thoughts are tonight.
Last edited by HurricaneQueen on Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9627 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:05 pm

Look at this loop


Clouds near the center rotating much slower than the clouds around it. Weirod.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38099
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9628 Postby Brent » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:06 pm

angelwing wrote:Ok, my friend lives 50 miles from the coast south of interstate 10 and he has told me he's not leaving...is it going to reach him? Al he has told me is that he is expecting winds but I am worried about storm surge and he is being stubborn and is going to stay...I have no clue about the layout there, so am I worrying for nothing?


What city is it? 50 miles inland is certainly safe from surge though(Katrina's only went 5 miles inland or so), assuming it's not close to Galveston Bay or something.
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9629 Postby tailgater » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:08 pm

Image
Eye is starting to show itself. Still a little open on the western edge.
0 likes   

fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9630 Postby fasterdisaster » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:09 pm

Ed Mahmoud wrote:Look at this loop


Clouds near the center rotating much slower than the clouds around it. Weirod.


That's because it's the eye.
0 likes   

User avatar
amawea
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 385
Age: 73
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 3:36 pm
Location: Horseshoe Bend, Ar. but from Baytown, Tx

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9631 Postby amawea » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:09 pm

In studying that sat. loop I believe you can just begin to make out some convection around what may be the new eye forming.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9632 Postby Sanibel » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:10 pm

Eye is starting to show itself. Still a little open on the western edge.



Glad someone else is seeing that. The eye is a small little tight eye just showing up under the finger of convection on the south part of the eye. Hazy but obvious. A mean looking eye.

It is tracking on trop points even though the upper eye that is moving out from above it looks west.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#9633 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:12 pm

I just cannot believe how big this storm is! Tropical force winds extend out 275 miles?! That's insane!
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9634 Postby jinftl » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:14 pm

$1 billion of Andrew's $25 billion in damage was done in LA according to NHC report....plus andrew is not the only storm on the list to have multiple landfallas or areas of impac. Katrina, Rita, and Betsy did damage in Florida before their gulf landfalls.

Not surprising...the more areas a storm hits, the damage adds up.

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1992andrew.html


Txdivermom wrote:
gatorcane wrote:
fasterdisaster wrote:

This is adjusted for inflation just so everyone knows.


7 of those top 10 costliest systems made landfall in Florida with Katrina only as a CAT 1 though.


Andrew was so costly because it hit both FL and LA. It did some pretty major damage in LA in addition to FL. (and yes, I know FL was devasted, but this awful storm double dipped)
0 likes   

User avatar
Pebbles
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1994
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 1:42 pm
Location: New Lenox, IL (SW of Chicago)

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9635 Postby Pebbles » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:14 pm

Ed Mahmoud wrote:Look at this loop
Clouds near the center rotating much slower than the clouds around it. Weirod.


Wow that is bizarre. Humm my totally noneducated thoughts is this will cause the windfield to continue to expand? I usually am pretty confident on what I'm seeing on most storms but this whole set up is so unusual it has me stumped. The hurricane is just not acting like a normal storm. The core is just... as you said WEIROD!
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9636 Postby RL3AO » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:14 pm

Ed Mahmoud wrote:Look at this loop


Clouds near the center rotating much slower than the clouds around it. Weirod.


Wouldn't that be normal? It would be like the inside horse on a carousel go slower than the outside horse because it has to cover less distance in the same amount of time?
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9637 Postby jinftl » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:16 pm

Not that andrew was not bad in LA....shows how really bad he was in FL. 96 cents of every dollar of damage from andrew was in florida.

fasterdisaster wrote:
Txdivermom wrote:Andrew was so costly because it hit both FL and LA. It did some pretty major damage in LA in addition to FL. (and yes, I know FL was devasted, but this awful storm double dipped)


I think only 1B of the 26B was from Louisiana though (not saying it wasn't bad in LA!)
0 likes   

User avatar
TSmith274
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 756
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 1:11 am
Location: New Orleans, La.

#9638 Postby TSmith274 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:16 pm

Ray Nagin just said that there are hotel rooms available in New Orleans and that he's worked a deal with the hotels to offer deep discounts to evacuees from Texas FYI. So if anyone is looking for rooms, check out N.O.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9639 Postby Sanibel » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:16 pm

You could be seeing the outer eyewall rotating faster than the inner.
0 likes   

User avatar
Wthrman13
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 502
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 12:44 pm
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9640 Postby Wthrman13 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:16 pm

Pebbles wrote:
Ed Mahmoud wrote:Look at this loop
Clouds near the center rotating much slower than the clouds around it. Weirod.


Wow that is bizarre. Humm my totally noneducated thoughts is this will cause the windfield to continue to expand? I usually am pretty confident on what I'm seeing on most storms but this whole set up is so unusual it has me stumped. The hurricane is just not acting like a normal storm. The core is just... as you said WEIROD!


That's leftover convective debris from the old inner eye, which has pretty much collapsed. That's why it's not rotating as fast as the clouds outside of that radius. If that debris were to clear out, you would see quite clearly the new, larger eye.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 156 guests