Tropical Storm Edouard recon discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
MiamiensisWx

Tropical Storm Edouard recon discussion

#1 Postby MiamiensisWx » Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:26 pm

Discuss the mission(s) here.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31390
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#2 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:27 pm

I expect recon will find rotation but whether it'll be totally closed off is hard to say, I'd guess they may well it in the process of closing off.
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

#3 Postby MiamiensisWx » Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:35 pm

Personally, I doubt they'll confirm the existance of a closed LLC, since I don't think it's present at this time. As I mentioned, the first signs of a formative LLC may be documented under the convection and MLC further south. Recent satellite imagery suggests that new convection may eventually develop in the vicinity between 25.9-28.9 N and 86.8-89.1 W as well. It will be interesting to observe future buoy/ASOS coastal observations later today and tonight.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#4 Postby RL3AO » Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:36 pm

Long flight...
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31390
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#5 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:42 pm

Haha compared to the flight to Bertha this is nothing :P
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 28974
Age: 72
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Spring Branch area, Houston, TX
Contact:

Re:

#6 Postby vbhoutex » Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:46 pm

MiamiensisWx wrote:Personally, I doubt they'll confirm the existance of a closed LLC, since I don't think it's present at this time. As I mentioned, the first signs of a formative LLC may be documented under the convection and MLC further south. Recent satellite imagery suggests that new convection may eventually develop in the vicinity between 25.9-28.9 N and 86.8-89.1 W as well. It will be interesting to observe future buoy/ASOS coastal observations later today and tonight.

I've been checking them this morning on a regular basis. I found obs lately that suggest a secondary circulation over the extreme SE tip of LA. I'm sure this is an anamoly of some sort, but it also suggests to me that there may be other " mini-vorts" circulating around the larger broad circulation. Needs to be a lot more consolidation in the lower levels for this system to start any kind of strengthening, much less become a tropical depression, imo. I definitely would like the rain something like this would bring to SE TX if track progs are correct, but I'm starting to wonder if it is going to develop. Don't get me wrong, I am not writing this off but I think development, whatever form it takes is going to be much slower than many think.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139083
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: 91L recon discussion

#7 Postby cycloneye » Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:47 pm

Plane already decending.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#8 Postby RL3AO » Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:55 pm

Operational altitude: 200 m.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31390
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#9 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:57 pm

200M...thats really low isn't it though I suppose its a weak system.

Edit---flight winds of 33kts and estimate surface winds of 34...if LLC is found we may see this go straight to TS status!
Last edited by KWT on Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re:

#10 Postby RL3AO » Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:59 pm

KWT wrote:200M...thats really low isn't it though I suppose its a weak system.


Usually its around 300m.
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

#11 Postby MiamiensisWx » Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:59 pm

They may classify this one as a TD if a broad, ill defined closed circulation is found. Proximity to land may play a role as well, especially when compared to other systems far out in the Atlantic.
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanefloyd5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1659
Age: 43
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 10:53 am
Location: Spartanburg
Contact:

Re: 91L recon discussion

#12 Postby hurricanefloyd5 » Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:59 pm

I expect that the RECON will find a TD and then after that I think watches/warning could go out.. With a system this close to land that I am sure is safe to say but I want to ait and sea what the recon find first and I am not trying to jump ahead of RECON'S ability to do the flight job!!!!!!!!!


RECON ROCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31390
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#13 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:02 pm

MiamiensisWx this would go straight to TS status given the winds found already would support 35kts.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139083
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: 91L recon discussion

#14 Postby cycloneye » Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:06 pm

Lowest pressure so far has been 1010.1 mbs.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8344
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: 91L recon discussion

#15 Postby SouthFloridawx » Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:12 pm

Sorry I'll post my questions here....
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8344
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: 91L recon discussion

#16 Postby SouthFloridawx » Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:18 pm

Found this cool decoding site...

http://tropicalatlantic.com/recon/

Are these winds correct?

Estimated Surface Wind (30 sec. Avg.)
Using Estimated Reduction Factor Peak Wind at Flight Level to
Est. Surface Reduction Factor

44.9 knots (~ 51.7 mph)
Tropical Storm
Last edited by SouthFloridawx on Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

xironman
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2159
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: NoVA

Re: 91L recon discussion

#17 Postby xironman » Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:20 pm

49 knot SFMR? Seems high
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

#18 Postby MiamiensisWx » Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:23 pm

It should be noted that the SFMR reading isn't flagged as "suspect". It could have been accurate, but it isn't representative of the system's maximum 1-min winds. It may have been related to one of the more intense, localized thunderstorms.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re:

#19 Postby RL3AO » Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:25 pm

MiamiensisWx wrote:It should be noted that the SFMR reading isn't flagged as "suspect". It could have been accurate, but it isn't representative of the system's maximum 1-min winds. It may have been related to one of the more intense, localized thunderstorms.


It never tagged the 100kt SFMR readings during Cristobal either.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31390
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#20 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:25 pm

Yeah there was some heavy rainfall when those higher readings came in but there has been some 30-35kts readings that have come during light to no rainfall.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 104 guests