Gustav Recon Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re:

#181 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:15 pm

WindRunner wrote:Dropsonde in the supposed "eyewall" seems to have gotten spun around a bit...surface reported 935mb/16kts, and looking at the wind profile it probably got spun out of the eyewall somewhere between 700 and 850mb...


That happened with Felix when he was bombing (in fact, it spun a whole loop around before landing in the eye).
0 likes   

physicx07
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 215
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 7:46 am
Location: Miami

Re:

#182 Postby physicx07 » Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:16 pm

WindRunner wrote:Dropsonde in the supposed "eyewall" seems to have gotten spun around a bit...surface reported 935mb/16kts, and looking at the wind profile it probably got spun out of the eyewall somewhere between 700 and 850mb...


Wow! We can only hope it's not really that low.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: Re:

#183 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:17 pm

physicx07 wrote:
WindRunner wrote:Dropsonde in the supposed "eyewall" seems to have gotten spun around a bit...surface reported 935mb/16kts, and looking at the wind profile it probably got spun out of the eyewall somewhere between 700 and 850mb...


Wow! We can only hope it's not really that low.


That would be well below the original dropsonde and extrapolations. I wouldn't be surprised though.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#184 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:19 pm

Dropsonde reading confirmed at 116 kt, so it is definitely a Cat 4 now.
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 33
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

Re: Re:

#185 Postby WindRunner » Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:21 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
WindRunner wrote:Dropsonde in the supposed "eyewall" seems to have gotten spun around a bit...surface reported 935mb/16kts, and looking at the wind profile it probably got spun out of the eyewall somewhere between 700 and 850mb...


That happened with Felix when he was bombing (in fact, it spun a whole loop around before landing in the eye).


Haha I think I remember that.

And yes, looking at the extra wind data it seems that the wind profile is as follows:
700mb - 315/78kts
723mb - 325/88kts
736mb - 325/75kts
757mb - 330/98kts
788mb - 305/120kts
850mb - 295/114kts
862mb - 290/115kts
872mb - 290/121kts
889mb - 285/121kts hold on....

Actually, I'm now realizing that this drop reads 935mb/116kts!!!

EDIT: to finish the wind profile...
899mb - 280/125kts
909mb - 275/118kts
922mb - 275/121kts
935mb - 265/116kts

Somehow MBL wind of only 112kts, which makes me doubt these specific readings.
Last edited by WindRunner on Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

physicx07
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 215
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 7:46 am
Location: Miami

Re:

#186 Postby physicx07 » Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:22 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:Dropsonde reading confirmed at 116 kt, so it is definitely a Cat 4 now.


Yes, and that was in the weaker SW portion of the storm.
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 33
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

Re: Gustav Recon Discussion

#187 Postby WindRunner » Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:30 pm

Man, I actually was planning on going out and doing some shopping this afternoon...looks like that's getting blown out of the water!
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139081
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Gustav Recon Discussion

#188 Postby cycloneye » Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:39 pm

Here is a detailed version of the VDM that just came out.

Product: Air Force Vortex Message (URNT12 KNHC)
Transmitted: 30th day of the month at 17:24Z
Aircraft: Air Force Aircraft (Last 3 digits of the tail number are 308)
Storm Number & Year: 07L in 2008
Storm Name: Gustav (in the North Atlantic basin)
Mission Number: 15
Observation Number: 03
A. Time of Center Fix: 30th day of the month at 16:54:50Z
B. Center Fix Coordinates: 21°27'N 82°21'W (21.45N 82.35W) (View map)
B. Center Fix Location: 109 miles (176 km) to the SE (128°) from Pinar del Río, Cuba.
C. Minimum Height at Standard Level: 2,638m (8,655ft) at 700mb
D. Estimated (by SFMR or visually) Maximum Surface Wind: 105kts (~ 120.8mph)
E. Location of the Estimated Maximum Surface Wind: 12 nautical miles (14 statute miles) to the NE (50°) of center fix
F. Maximum Flight Level Wind Inbound: From 140° at 141kts (From the SE at ~ 162.3mph)
G. Location of Maximum Flight Level Wind Inbound: 18 nautical miles (21 statute miles) to the NE (51°) of center fix
H. Minimum Sea Level Pressure: 945mb (27.91 inHg)
I. Maximum Flight Level Temp & Pressure Altitude Outside Eye: 9°C (48°F) at a pressure alt. of 3,048m (10,000ft)
J. Maximum Flight Level Temp & Pressure Altitude Inside Eye: 19°C (66°F) at a pressure alt. of 3,042m (9,980ft)
K. Dewpoint Temp (collected at same location as temp inside eye): 5°C (41°F)
K. Sea Surface Temp (collected at same location as temp inside eye): Not Available
L. Eye Character: Closed Wall
M. Eye Shape & Diameter: Circular with a diameter of 30 nautical miles (35 statute miles)
N. Fix Determined By: Penetration, Radar, Wind, Pressure and Temperature
N. Fix Level: 700mb
O. Navigation Fix Accuracy: 0.02 nautical miles
O. Meteorological Accuracy: 1 nautical mile
Remarks Section:
Maximum Flight Level Wind: 140kts (~ 161.1mph) in the northeast quadrant at 16:49:30Z
Maximum Surface (likely estimated by SFMR) Wind Outbound: 108kts (~ 124.3mph) in the southwest quadrant at 16:58Z
0 likes   

Chris_in_Tampa
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4963
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:06 pm
Location: Tampa, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: Gustav Recon Discussion

#189 Postby Chris_in_Tampa » Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:47 pm

Here is why the dropsonde that measured 935mb seems to be wrong.

Image

See those coords well away from the flight path? That is where the sonde landed, in the eyewall, with 133 mph winds. That makes no sense to have a pressure like that where it landed. Something must have been damaged on the way down so that it reported that very wrong pressure. The 945mb sonde dropped in the eye. Where that sonde dropped is noted where the wind shift occurred.

Although, this is my opinion that the 935mb is invalid.
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 33
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

Re: Gustav Recon Discussion

#190 Postby WindRunner » Sat Aug 30, 2008 1:00 pm

Chris_in_Tampa wrote:Here is why the dropsonde that measured 935mb seems to be wrong.

Image

See those coords well away from the flight path? That is where the sonde landed, in the eyewall, with 133 mph winds. That makes no sense to have a pressure like that where it landed. Something must have been damaged on the way down so that it reported that very wrong pressure. The 945mb sonde dropped in the eye. Where that sonde dropped is noted where the wind shift occurred.

Although, this is my opinion that the 935mb is invalid.


I agree...although in terms of its location relative to the flight path, I see no problem with that...the strong winds should blow it around about that much, and the slow backing of the wind as it dropped supports about that much rotation around the eyewall as well. I think the winds are fine, I'm just not sure why the pressure would read funny. The pressure IS fine when the sonde leaves the plane (first wind report was at 698mb, the flight level at that time), but I don't see any horrible discontinuities elsewhere. Personally, I'll wait the ~40 minutes to the next fix before making any wholehearted suggestions otherwise.
0 likes   

User avatar
gotoman38
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1395
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 1:15 pm
Location: near Durham, NC

Re: Gustav Recon Discussion

#191 Postby gotoman38 » Sat Aug 30, 2008 3:26 pm

Interesting that they're flying over Cuba's landmass - they usually avoid flying over ANY land, especially Cuba (except in transit) - any ideas on this?
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#192 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Aug 30, 2008 3:31 pm

Last data supports 130 kt intensity.
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 33
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

Re:

#193 Postby WindRunner » Sat Aug 30, 2008 3:43 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:Last data supports 130 kt intensity.


Yeah, but with the landfall and frictional effects I wouldn't be surprised if they left it as-is at 125kts.

Also interesting to note that FL winds supported hurricane-strength winds for about half the width of the Cuban island on the most recent outbound leg, using the traditional reductions. In reality, near-hurricane force winds are probably being felt along a line starting at Havana and running appx. SErd.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#194 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Aug 30, 2008 5:05 pm

137 kt at 13,000 feet (620mb) is what at the surface?
0 likes   

User avatar
gotoman38
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1395
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 1:15 pm
Location: near Durham, NC

Re: Gustav Recon Discussion

#195 Postby gotoman38 » Sat Aug 30, 2008 5:31 pm

Cuban landfall area

Image

Image

Image
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#196 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Aug 30, 2008 5:42 pm

Looks like the VDM missed the eye since the 941 is not lined up with the clearing.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139081
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Gustav Recon Discussion

#197 Postby cycloneye » Sat Aug 30, 2008 5:48 pm

Here is the detailed recent VDM:

Product: Air Force Vortex Message (URNT12 KNHC)
Transmitted: 30th day of the month at 22:30Z
Aircraft: Air Force Aircraft (Last 3 digits of the tail number are 308)
Storm Number & Year: 07L in 2008
Storm Name: Gustav (in the North Atlantic basin)
Mission Number: 15
Observation Number: 17
A. Time of Center Fix: 30th day of the month at 21:54:10Z
B. Center Fix Coordinates: 22°21'N 83°05'W (22.35N 83.0833W) (View map)
B. Center Fix Location: 39 miles (63 km) to the E (98°) from Pinar del Río, Cuba.
C. Minimum Height at Standard Level: 2,604m (8,543ft) at 700mb
D. Estimated (by SFMR or visually) Maximum Surface Wind: 53kts (~ 61.0mph)
E. Location of the Estimated Maximum Surface Wind: 41 nautical miles (47 statute miles) to the NW (315°) of center fix
F. Maximum Flight Level Wind Inbound: From 66° at 123kts (From the ENE at ~ 141.5mph)
G. Location of Maximum Flight Level Wind Inbound: 14 nautical miles (16 statute miles) to the NW (320°) of center fix
H. Minimum Sea Level Pressure: 941mb (27.79 inHg)
I. Maximum Flight Level Temp & Pressure Altitude Outside Eye: 10°C (50°F) at a pressure alt. of 3,052m (10,013ft)
J. Maximum Flight Level Temp & Pressure Altitude Inside Eye: 22°C (72°F) at a pressure alt. of 3,048m (10,000ft)
K. Dewpoint Temp (collected at same location as temp inside eye): 6°C (43°F)
K. Sea Surface Temp (collected at same location as temp inside eye): Not Available
L. Eye Character: Closed Wall
M. Eye Shape & Diameter: Circular with a diameter of 24 nautical miles (28 statute miles)
N. Fix Determined By: Penetration, Radar, Wind, Pressure and Temperature
N. Fix Level: 700mb
O. Navigation Fix Accuracy: 0.02 nautical miles
O. Meteorological Accuracy: 1 nautical mile
Remarks Section - Remarks That Were Decoded...
Maximum Flight Level Wind Outbound: 123kts (~ 141.5mph) in the southeast quadrant at 21:57Z
Remarks Section - Additional Remarks...
MAX FL WIND 143 NE QUAD 2014Z
CENTER EYE MOVING ONSHORE
0 likes   

Nexus
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 137
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 12:13 am

Re: Gustav Recon Discussion

#198 Postby Nexus » Sat Aug 30, 2008 5:52 pm

gotoman38 wrote:Interesting that they're flying over Cuba's landmass - they usually avoid flying over ANY land, especially Cuba (except in transit) - any ideas on this?


They are allowed to fly over land during the day. I do wonder what the cutoff for "daytime" is though, being the center is onshore now, and it's getting dark soon.
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 33
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

Re: Gustav Recon Discussion

#199 Postby WindRunner » Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:00 pm

Nexus wrote:
gotoman38 wrote:Interesting that they're flying over Cuba's landmass - they usually avoid flying over ANY land, especially Cuba (except in transit) - any ideas on this?


They are allowed to fly over land during the day. I do wonder what the cutoff for "daytime" is though, being the center is onshore now, and it's getting dark soon.


It really doesn't matter, as it'll still technically be dusk/pre-sunset around when they make their last fix of the flight, at 00z. After that, they'll leave the storm and not come back until much later (next fix scheduled for 06z) and the center should be out over water by that point anyway.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#200 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:11 pm

NOAA plane just reported 127 kt at about 650mb - in the SE quad.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 133 guests