ATL INVEST 91L: Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#101 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Sep 12, 2008 7:43 am

12/1145 UTC 23.1N 71.0W T1.0/1.0 91L -- Atlantic Ocean
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139222
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#102 Postby cycloneye » Fri Sep 12, 2008 7:49 am

12:00 UTC BEST TRACK:

AL, 91, 2008091212, , BEST, 0, 228N, 715W, 25, 1013, DB,
0 likes   

User avatar
AdamFirst
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2487
Age: 35
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:54 am
Location: Port Saint Lucie, FL

Re: ATL INVEST 91L: Discussion

#103 Postby AdamFirst » Fri Sep 12, 2008 8:48 am

If this ends up developing, wouldn't they end up using Josephine again?
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23499
Age: 46
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#104 Postby gatorcane » Fri Sep 12, 2008 8:58 am

cycloneye wrote:ABNT20 KNHC 121205
TWOAT
TROPICAL WEATHER OUTLOOK
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
800 AM EDT FRI SEP 12 2008

FOR THE NORTH ATLANTIC...CARIBBEAN SEA AND THE GULF OF MEXICO...

THE NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER IS ISSUING ADVISORIES ON LARGE
HURRICANE IKE...LOCATED ABOUT 230 MILES SOUTHEAST OF GALVESTON
TEXAS.

:rarrow: AN AREA OF DISTURBED WEATHER...INCLUDING SOME OF THE REMNANTS OF
TROPICAL STORM JOSEPHINE...IS LOCATED ABOUT 200 MILES NORTHEAST OF
THE SOUTHEASTERN BAHAMAS. SOME SLOW DEVELOPMENT IS POSSIBLE OVER
THE NEXT COUPLE OF DAYS AS IT MOVES SLOWLY WEST-NORTHWESTWARD.

ELSEWHERE...TROPICAL CYCLONE FORMATION IS NOT EXPECTED DURING THE
NEXT 48 HOURS.

$$
FORECASTER ROBERTS/AVILA


well the wording has changed slightly more in favor of development. The previous couple of TWO's indicated "development IF ANY"...

the models that develop this wait for about 48-72 hours until it is over the Bahamas....then drive it WNW to NW into the SE Coast of Florida (or just along the East coast of Florida) but nothing strong at the moment.
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3873
Age: 60
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: West Melbourne, Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL INVEST 91L: Discussion

#105 Postby AJC3 » Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:14 am

AdamFirst wrote:If this ends up developing, wouldn't they end up using Josephine again?


A couple days ago, my answer to this question was that IMHO they would b/c in my mind there was clear continuity between Josephine and this area of disturbed weather. Now I don't think they would anymore because it has gotten itself tangled up with a second area of disturbed weather that was out ahead of it. I think that's why this was designated a separate invest number 91L on NRL, and even the verbiage in the last few TWO's (i.e. "AN AREA OF DISTURBED WEATHER, INCLUDING THE PARTIAL REMNANTS OF JOSEPHINE") makes it clear to me that a new number/name would be used if it developed into something.

That having been said, I don't think it will develop. Aside from the NAM which (isn't really a global model, and) has a horrible bias toward TC-genesis, I haven't seen any global model really do very much with 91L (granted I haven't looked at the *cough* *gasp* ...CMC). Additionally, there's an UL trough immediately to it's west and a more well-defined ULL to it's NW that is dropping south. I think the convective flareups you're seeing with 91L are baroclinically enhanced (i.e. jet forced ascent) - meaning the shear that the trough to the west is imparting on 91L is divergent.

Something to watch...as it could enhance rain chances here in the FL east coast several days down the road should some of the vort energy hold together and actually get this far west.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10348
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL INVEST 91L: Discussion

#106 Postby Sanibel » Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:19 am

Very weak center. Won't develop until Ike departs Gulf.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6776
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL INVEST 91L: Discussion

#107 Postby jlauderdal » Fri Sep 12, 2008 10:40 am

AJC3 wrote:
AdamFirst wrote:If this ends up developing, wouldn't they end up using Josephine again?


A couple days ago, my answer to this question was that IMHO they would b/c in my mind there was clear continuity between Josephine and this area of disturbed weather. Now I don't think they would anymore because it has gotten itself tangled up with a second area of disturbed weather that was out ahead of it. I think that's why this was designated a separate invest number 91L on NRL, and even the verbiage in the last few TWO's (i.e. "AN AREA OF DISTURBED WEATHER, INCLUDING THE PARTIAL REMNANTS OF JOSEPHINE") makes it clear to me that a new number/name would be used if it developed into something.

That having been said, I don't think it will develop. Aside from the NAM which (isn't really a global model, and) has a horrible bias toward TC-genesis, I haven't seen any global model really do very much with 91L (granted I haven't looked at the *cough* *gasp* ...CMC). Additionally, there's an UL trough immediately to it's west and a more well-defined ULL to it's NW that is dropping south. I think the convective flareups you're seeing with 91L are baroclinically enhanced (i.e. jet forced ascent) - meaning the shear that the trough to the west is imparting on 91L is divergent.

Something to watch...as it could enhance rain chances here in the FL east coast several days down the road should some of the vort energy hold together and actually get this far west.


Boo Hoo
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3296
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

Re: ATL INVEST 91L: Discussion

#108 Postby fci » Fri Sep 12, 2008 10:52 am

AJC3 wrote:
AdamFirst wrote:If this ends up developing, wouldn't they end up using Josephine again?


A couple days ago, my answer to this question was that IMHO they would b/c in my mind there was clear continuity between Josephine and this area of disturbed weather. Now I don't think they would anymore because it has gotten itself tangled up with a second area of disturbed weather that was out ahead of it. I think that's why this was designated a separate invest number 91L on NRL, and even the verbiage in the last few TWO's (i.e. "AN AREA OF DISTURBED WEATHER, INCLUDING THE PARTIAL REMNANTS OF JOSEPHINE") makes it clear to me that a new number/name would be used if it developed into something.

That having been said, I don't think it will develop. Aside from the NAM which (isn't really a global model, and) has a horrible bias toward TC-genesis, I haven't seen any global model really do very much with 91L (granted I haven't looked at the *cough* *gasp* ...CMC). Additionally, there's an UL trough immediately to it's west and a more well-defined ULL to it's NW that is dropping south. I think the convective flareups you're seeing with 91L are baroclinically enhanced (i.e. jet forced ascent) - meaning the shear that the trough to the west is imparting on 91L is divergent.

Something to watch...as it could enhance rain chances here in the FL east coast several days down the road should some of the vort energy hold together and actually get this far west.



Thanks Tony for adding sensibility to this discussion.
Those who are getting hot and bothered, make sure you read

NEWS FLASH: Not every Invest is a threat to South Florida.
0 likes   

User avatar
dixiebreeze
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5140
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
Location: crystal river, fla.

Re: ATL INVEST 91L: Discussion

#109 Postby dixiebreeze » Fri Sep 12, 2008 10:56 am

Looks like 91L is getting her groove on:

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/rb-l.jpg
0 likes   

Weatherfreak000

#110 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Fri Sep 12, 2008 11:06 am

I am indeed still weary on development with this but becoming a little bit more intrigued...

24 hours of sustained convection and I think I can jump on the bandwagon. Overall, I think this has an alright shot to become Kyle.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#111 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Sep 12, 2008 12:44 pm

815
ABNT20 KNHC 121726
TWOAT
TROPICAL WEATHER OUTLOOK
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
200 PM EDT FRI SEP 12 2008

FOR THE NORTH ATLANTIC...CARIBBEAN SEA AND THE GULF OF MEXICO...

THE NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER IS ISSUING ADVISORIES ON HURRICANE
IKE...LOCATED OVER THE NORTHWESTERN GULF OF MEXICO.

:rarrow: AN AREA OF DISTURBED WEATHER...INCLUDING SOME OF THE REMNANTS OF
TROPICAL STORM JOSEPHINE...IS LOCATED A COUPLE HUNDRED MILES
NORTHEAST OF THE SOUTHEASTERN BAHAMAS. SOME SLOW DEVELOPMENT OF
THIS SYSTEM IS POSSIBLE OVER THE NEXT COUPLE OF DAYS AS IT MOVES
SLOWLY WEST-NORTHWESTWARD.

SHOWERS AND THUNDERSTORMS HAVE INCREASED THIS AFTERNOON IN
ASSOCIATION WITH A TROPICAL WAVE LOCATED ABOUT 1400 MILES EAST OF
THE WINDWARD ISLANDS. DEVELOPMENT...IF ANY...OF THIS SYSTEM IS
EXPECTED TO BE SLOW TO OCCUR AS IT MOVES NORTHWESTWARD AT ABOUT
15 MPH.

ELSEWHERE...TROPICAL CYCLONE FORMATION IS NOT EXPECTED DURING THE
NEXT 48 HOURS.

$$
FORECASTER ROBERTS/BROWN
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#112 Postby RL3AO » Fri Sep 12, 2008 12:46 pm

I. ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
1. NEGATIVE RECONNAISSANCE REQUIREMENTS.
2. OUTLOOK FOR SUCCEEDING DAY: POSSIBLE LOW LEVEL
INVEST NEAR 25.0N 77.5W AT 14/1800Z WITH FOLLOW ON
6-HRLY FIXES BEGINNING AT 15/0600Z IF SYSTEM DEVELOPS
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23499
Age: 46
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#113 Postby gatorcane » Fri Sep 12, 2008 12:47 pm

:uarrow:

well it appears NHC has gained some interest in this area....

convection has been gradually on the increase here also.....

Image
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6776
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL INVEST 91L: Discussion

#114 Postby jlauderdal » Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:00 pm

we need to get ajc3 on board with this system, he had a good call on hanna surviving when it looked like it could collapse at any minute.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139222
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL INVEST 91L: Discussion

#115 Postby cycloneye » Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:06 pm

I think its time to bring a new family here apart from what jlauderdal posted back in the thread.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3873
Age: 60
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: West Melbourne, Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL INVEST 91L: Discussion

#116 Postby AJC3 » Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:11 pm

jlauderdal wrote:we need to get ajc3 on board with this system, he had a good call on hanna surviving when it looked like it could collapse at any minute.



LOL...thx, however like I said earlier, I just don't like the look of the upper air pattern near this system with an upper trough to it's west providing quite a bit of upper tropospheric shear over and around the wave axis, and another upper low to the NW dropping southward.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/nwatl/loop-wv.html

I'll take a better look at it, and some of the high res model data when I get into work (3 PM) to see if upper conditions look like they might improve. But for now, count me as still saying 'nyet' as far as development into a TC is concerned.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6776
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL INVEST 91L: Discussion

#117 Postby jlauderdal » Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:13 pm

cycloneye wrote:I think its time to bring a new family here apart from what jlauderdal posted back in the thread.

Image


these bears look more interested than this mornings polar bears
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#118 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:16 pm

Image

This image is better to describe 91L. Just waiting for better conditions to develop but it's not in a hurry!!!
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6776
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL INVEST 91L: Discussion

#119 Postby jlauderdal » Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:16 pm

AJC3 wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:we need to get ajc3 on board with this system, he had a good call on hanna surviving when it looked like it could collapse at any minute.



LOL...thx, however like I said earlier, I just don't like the look of the upper air pattern near this system with an upper trough to it's west providing quite a bit of upper tropospheric shear over and around the wave axis, and another upper low to the NW dropping southward.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/nwatl/loop-wv.html

I'll take a better look at it, and some of the high res model data when I get into work (3 PM) to see if upper conditions look like they might improve. But for now, count me as still saying 'nyet' as far as development into a TC is concerned.


no peeking at what is going on around hou/galveston while on duty, the weather around east central florida looks really active later today which should keep everyone real busy :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3873
Age: 60
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: West Melbourne, Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL INVEST 91L: Discussion

#120 Postby AJC3 » Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:21 pm

jlauderdal wrote: no peeking at what is going on around hou/galveston while on duty, the weather around east central florida looks really active later today which should keep everyone real busy :wink:



Actually, from the looks of things, this evening's probably gonna be pretty tame. The AM crew's HWO/G-HWO mentioned only isolated lightning strikes over the interior in a deep onshore flow regime, and typically storms aren't all that intense and tend to pile up toward the west coast during deep easterlies.

http://www.srh.noaa.gov/mlb/ghwo/ghwomain.shtml
http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?rid= ... 11&loop=no
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests