ATL : TROPICAL DEPRESSION ERIKA (06L)

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145555
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1381 Postby cycloneye » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:03 am

The 12 UTC SHIP shear forecast looks favorable for 94L.

Code: Select all

ATLANTIC SHIPS INTENSITY FORECAST       *
                    *      GOES DATA AVAILABLE                  *
                    *      OHC  DATA AVAILABLE                  *
                    *  INVEST      AL942009  08/31/09  12 UTC   *

TIME (HR)          0     6    12    18    24    36    48    60    72    84    96   108   120

SHEAR (KT)         7     2     8     4     4     2     4     9    10    12     5    12    12
0 likes   

otowntiger
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1921
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm

Re:

#1382 Postby otowntiger » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:05 am

Derek Ortt wrote:if this deosn't develop today, it probably does not develop at all given the latest shear trends

I am curious, just how HORRIFIC does the upper shear forecasts have to be before changes are made? These shear forecasts are embarrassing. Last night, SHIPS was showing strong EASTERLY shear affecting this in 48 hours.


Well Derek you one of the scientists, go help them figure it out. :lol: We're all behind you! :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanetrack
HurricaneTrack.com
HurricaneTrack.com
Posts: 1781
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:46 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

#1383 Postby hurricanetrack » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:06 am

If it does develop today then it should be torn apart tomorrow then based on that thinking. Perhaps this will never be upgraded since it looks like there is enough shear to reduce this to a pile of ashes and then those ashes get blown around by even more shear. This would explain very well why the global models don't "see" this. It won't be there to see apparently. Oh well, it was interesting while it lasted. I suspect that the next TWO would mention the unfavorable upper level winds ahead and am not sure why the last one did not.
0 likes   

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re:

#1384 Postby Evil Jeremy » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:10 am

hurricanetrack wrote:If it does develop today then it should be torn apart tomorrow then based on that thinking. Perhaps this will never be upgraded since it looks like there is enough shear to reduce this to a pile of ashes and then those ashes get blown around by even more shear. This would explain very well why the global models don't "see" this. It won't be there to see apparently. Oh well, it was interesting while it lasted. I suspect that the next TWO would mention the unfavorable upper level winds ahead and am not sure why the last one did not.


You make it sound like this system is already dead. Anything can happen in the tropics, and I don't think this system will simply fall apart.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1385 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:11 am

cycloneye wrote:The 12 UTC SHIP shear forecast looks favorable for 94L.

Code: Select all

ATLANTIC SHIPS INTENSITY FORECAST       *
                    *      GOES DATA AVAILABLE                  *
                    *      OHC  DATA AVAILABLE                  *
                    *  INVEST      AL942009  08/31/09  12 UTC   *

TIME (HR)          0     6    12    18    24    36    48    60    72    84    96   108   120

SHEAR (KT)         7     2     8     4     4     2     4     9    10    12     5    12    12


Let me guess, the Good For you know what missed another large UL?
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5899
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1386 Postby MGC » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:13 am

Looks like a TD to me...but the NHC has the final say but if I were running the place I'd say UPGRADE! Sure don't look any worst than Danny did.......MGC
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#1387 Postby x-y-no » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:15 am

Much of that shear directly ahead is due to outflow from 94L itself. I think pretty much all of the increase in shear overnight as depicted by CIMSS is attributable to the burst of convection.

That said, there is an issue with mid-level westerly shear ahead which looks like it could inhibit development.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#1388 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:16 am

THe shear should stay about the same as long as it moves with the upper lows.. since they are just about moving in tandum right now..
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanetrack
HurricaneTrack.com
HurricaneTrack.com
Posts: 1781
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:46 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

#1389 Postby hurricanetrack » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:18 am

I just looked at the ECMWF shear map for the next 168 hours and wow! It is really looking bad for this thing. I totally missed that when thinking this would develop and be a player. Unless all of these models are off the mark, there is shear city out there waiting for this thing. I would post the links to these maps but they are on a proprietary site with a password. I have my doubts now unless something unexpected happens. Could be a short upgrade like Ingrid in 2007- remember THAT one. It was downright obscene to watch that poor puppy get killed by shear approaching Mach 1.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7184
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1390 Postby jlauderdal » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:18 am

MGC wrote:Looks like a TD to me...but the NHC has the final say but if I were running the place I'd say UPGRADE! Sure don't look any worst than Danny did.......MGC


upgrading on looks isnt very scientific nor is it how things are done
0 likes   

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

Re:

#1391 Postby 'CaneFreak » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:20 am

hurricanetrack wrote:I just looked at the ECMWF shear map for the next 168 hours and wow! It is really looking bad for this thing. I totally missed that when thinking this would develop and be a player. Unless all of these models are off the mark, there is shear city out there waiting for this thing. I would post the links to these maps but they are on a proprietary site with a password. I have my doubts now unless something unexpected happens. Could be a short upgrade like Ingrid in 2007- remember THAT one. It was downright obscene to watch that poor puppy get killed by shear approaching Mach 1.


Its just the year of the shear...thats my new saying for anything and everything that develops...
0 likes   

User avatar
tpr1967
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 185
Age: 58
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2003 8:37 pm
Location: Palmetto,FL

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1392 Postby tpr1967 » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:21 am

Thats why the ECWF has this moving so far to the west in the long term basically keeps it a wave.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re:

#1393 Postby Stormcenter » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:22 am

I guess that's why "some" of the models don't show 94L becoming much.
I can't say I'm sad to read that bit of information. Thanks hurricanetrack.

hurricanetrack wrote:I just looked at the ECMWF shear map for the next 168 hours and wow! It is really looking bad for this thing. I totally missed that when thinking this would develop and be a player. Unless all of these models are off the mark, there is shear city out there waiting for this thing. I would post the links to these maps but they are on a proprietary site with a password. I have my doubts now unless something unexpected happens. Could be a short upgrade like Ingrid in 2007- remember THAT one. It was downright obscene to watch that poor puppy get killed by shear approaching Mach 1.
0 likes   

User avatar
AtlanticWind
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 66
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 9:57 pm
Location: Plantation,Fla

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1394 Postby AtlanticWind » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:29 am

http://euler.atmos.colostate.edu/~vigh/ ... early1.png

Funny all this "Shear" coming up and look at the intesity forecasts.
0 likes   

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1395 Postby 'CaneFreak » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:32 am

AtlanticWind wrote:http://euler.atmos.colostate.edu/~vigh/guidance/northatlantic/intensity_early1.png

Funny all this "Shear" coming up and look at the intesity forecasts.


and so I take it you agree with these intensity forecasts despite the overwhelming evidence that shear will increase as this thing moves west?
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re:

#1396 Postby tailgater » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:32 am

Aric Dunn wrote:THe shear should stay about the same as long as it moves with the upper lows.. since they are just about moving in tandum right now..

I was just thinking the same thing and the mid and upper level portion of this storm seem to be developing nicely and with the convection it has now I would think the lower levels will start to fall in line shortly.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22984
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1397 Postby wxman57 » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:33 am

Pressure at the buoy just west of the center has risen another 1/2 millibar in the past hour, and still has a NE wind 5 kts. Not a sign of a developing system.
0 likes   

User avatar
AtlanticWind
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 66
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 9:57 pm
Location: Plantation,Fla

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1398 Postby AtlanticWind » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:35 am

'CaneFreak wrote:
AtlanticWind wrote:http://euler.atmos.colostate.edu/~vigh/guidance/northatlantic/intensity_early1.png

Funny all this "Shear" coming up and look at the intesity forecasts.


and so I take it you agree with these intensity forecasts despite the overwhelming evidence that shear will increase as this thing moves west?

These forecasts take in to account shear , at this point there are conflicting forecasts on how much shear 94l will encounter , lets wait and see , by the way Hwrf shows this as a major hurricane!
Last edited by AtlanticWind on Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
tpr1967
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 185
Age: 58
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2003 8:37 pm
Location: Palmetto,FL

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1399 Postby tpr1967 » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:35 am

WXMAN could the LLC be redeveloping further east near the convection.
0 likes   

jconsor
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 552
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 9:31 pm
Location: Jerusalem, Israel
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1400 Postby jconsor » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:40 am

One would think that convective burst would eventually cause pressures to lower and the circulation to tighten up, but this system seems to be perpetually stretched NE to SW.

wxman57 wrote:Pressure at the buoy just west of the center has risen another 1/2 millibar in the past hour, and still has a NE wind 5 kts. Not a sign of a developing system.
0 likes   


Return to “2009”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests