ATL : TROPICAL DEPRESSION ERIKA (06L)

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1721 Postby clfenwi » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:39 pm

gatorcane wrote:
cycloneye wrote:Derek,in past systems you talked about sometimes strong systems go more west and weak ones go north.What do you say about 94L?


I have a feeling he will say strong means more of a recurve possibility (Bermuda threat???), weak means more west.......


Although, if you look at the BAM suite, the shallow BAM is the northern-most, while the deep and medium BAMs are further south.
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1722 Postby Bocadude85 » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:39 pm

So is this moving to the NW now?
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145675
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1723 Postby cycloneye » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:41 pm

Bocadude85 wrote:So is this moving to the NW now?


WNW at 295 degrees per Bam models at 00 UTC.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1724 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:42 pm

cycloneye wrote:Derek,in past systems you talked about sometimes strong systems go more west and weak ones go north.What do you say about 94L?


weak means west this time, with the low level flow
0 likes   

User avatar
Lurker
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 176
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:14 am
Location: Miami, Fl

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1725 Postby Lurker » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:44 pm

Just curious....are your chances still near 0 at this time?

george_r_1961 wrote:Last night we had some convection caused by this system interacting with a UL that was clearly shown on the shear map. There was some evidence of maybe an mlc.

This afternoon it looks horrible. Chances of development in the next 24-36 hours are near zero in my opinion.
0 likes   

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1726 Postby 'CaneFreak » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:47 pm

cycloneye wrote:
Bocadude85 wrote:So is this moving to the NW now?


WNW at 295 degrees per Bam models at 00 UTC.


right, the circulation is trying to reform to the NW...but the whole system is moving to the wnw...
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1727 Postby jinftl » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:47 pm

An invest that has been struggling for days to even close off a circulation is 'strong'.....what would a weak system be?

94L is looking a bit better but this is in no way 'ramping up'. The shear map reminds us of that.

In the world of 'relatively speaking', Bill was the strong system more prone to recurving and 94L is the wnw trakker. In fact, he may bend back to the west per several models which show him not building much latitude west of 60W. Gaining latitude now may ultimately result in a system moving north of....not be ripped apart over...hispanola.

Image

gatorcane wrote:
cycloneye wrote:Derek,in past systems you talked about sometimes strong systems go more west and weak ones go north.What do you say about 94L?


I have a feeling he will say strong means more of a recurve possibility (Bermuda threat???), weak means more west.......
Last edited by jinftl on Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22985
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1728 Postby wxman57 » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:54 pm

AtlanticWind wrote:
wxman57 wrote:I wouldn't get too excited yet. The 00Z position is still about 100 mils SW of that convective burst. You won't be able to tell much at all using IR imagery tonight. You have to use a combination of visible imagery and actual surface obs to determine what's really happening. Surface obs from the two buoys in the area don't indicate much happening yet (like LLC reforming northeast). Certainly not a TD now. Maybe tomorrow. The convective burst is impressive, anyway.

Too late, Im excited :D


I told you to wait. ;-)

Well, I think that the NHC will wait until morning to take a good look at visible imagery before doing anything, which means a full night's sleep for me. Off to bed.
0 likes   

User avatar
BensonTCwatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1046
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:11 pm
Location: Southport NC

#1729 Postby BensonTCwatcher » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:57 pm

No, Derek has repeatedly said (and every other met I have seen here) weak (or shallow) systems are steered by lower level flow versus stronger (deeper) systems are steered at higher level flows. It all depends on which way the prevailing wind is flowing at a given atmospheric height. Most of the time, weaker systems are caught in the westerly flow nearer the surface, but they could also be NW or N depending on longitude.

Correct me if I am wrong
0 likes   

Scorpion

#1730 Postby Scorpion » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:59 pm

LLC will definitely form under that convection
0 likes   

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

Re:

#1731 Postby 'CaneFreak » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:01 pm

BensonTCwatcher wrote:No, Derek has repeatedly said (and every other met I have seen here) weak (or shallow) systems are steered by lower level flow versus stronger (deeper) systems are steered at higher level flows. It all depends on which way the prevailing wind is flowing at a given atmospheric height. Most of the time, weaker systems are caught in the westerly flow nearer the surface, but they could also be NW or N depending on longitude.

Correct me if I am wrong


Absolutely....to put it more plainly, the stronger the system the more vertical depth it takes up in the atmosphere....thus the need to figure out the steering flow in the upper levels in order to determine in which direction the system will move...however, for most systems the 500 mb flow will work....it is usually a good level for most systems unless they are extremely weak or extremely strong... :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanetrack
HurricaneTrack.com
HurricaneTrack.com
Posts: 1781
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:46 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

#1732 Postby hurricanetrack » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:02 pm

If this thing really is out there for another 200+ hours as some models show, this thread could set a record. Poor us. People are upset, tired and impatient waiting on this thing to develop. Not everyone, but people in general. Hang in there, it was still there when I got up THIS morning and it should still be there tomorrow- and stronger too! I put in a good word for Ben Linus to pass along to Jacob that we really need an upgrade here to help calm "the others". Let's see if destiny calls.
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re:

#1733 Postby jinftl » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:03 pm

Correct. I guess the question becomes, is 94L considered weak and prone to lower level steering or strong and prone to higher level steering. In terms of organization, this is definitely a prime contender to be steered by the low level flow.....as the track-to-date and especially the model forecasts suggest.

BensonTCwatcher wrote:No, Derek has repeatedly said (and every other met I have seen here) weak (or shallow) systems are steered by lower level flow versus stronger (deeper) systems are steered at higher level flows. It all depends on which way the prevailing wind is flowing at a given atmospheric height. Most of the time, weaker systems are caught in the westerly flow nearer the surface, but they could also be NW or N depending on longitude.

Correct me if I am wrong
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re:

#1734 Postby jinftl » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:05 pm

Folks shouldn't be that hard up for development, i mean we did see 4 named storms, including one cat 4, in the last couple of weeks. Not to mention, the near Cat 5 south of Baja.


hurricanetrack wrote:If this thing really is out there for another 200+ hours as some models show, this thread could set a record. Poor us. People are upset, tired and impatient waiting on this thing to develop. Not everyone, but people in general. Hang in there, it was still there when I got up THIS morning and it should still be there tomorrow- and stronger too! I put in a good word for Ben Linus to pass along to Jacob that we really need an upgrade here to help calm "the others". Let's see if destiny calls.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1735 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:06 pm

Image

First time in a long time that strong convection lasts during the entire day
0 likes   

User avatar
BensonTCwatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1046
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:11 pm
Location: Southport NC

#1736 Postby BensonTCwatcher » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:09 pm

No doubt this is stacking up. I would bet the morning visibles confirm the LLC under the convection if it hasn't already done so.
0 likes   

User avatar
GeneratorPower
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1648
Age: 45
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:48 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1737 Postby GeneratorPower » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:09 pm

Just to put that giant thunderstorm complex in perspective...the area showing "black" on the IR-channel 4 picture below is approximately 1 degree of LATITUDE and 1 degree of LONGITUDE in size. This is approximately equal to a SINGLE THUNDERSTORM that COVERS AN AREA 70 MILES WIDE BY 70 MILES LONG. That's BIG.

Image

EDIT: Added annotations.
Last edited by GeneratorPower on Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11162
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1738 Postby Ivanhater » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:12 pm

Image
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1739 Postby Sanibel » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:12 pm

No look back
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1740 Postby jinftl » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:12 pm

Impressive.....but the question is, do we have a closed-off circulation? Cloud tops will warm and cool during the day, the key to this system is the need to be developing a closed circulation, not fighting the shear as much, and getting vertically stacked.

Living in South Florida, we see very impressive thunderstorm complexes from time to time....but that doesn't make them developing hurricanes. That said, we may see a td tomorrow. But 3 days from invest to td doesn't equate to rapid intensification.

(but it may well end up being that her slow-to-organize nature is what buys her ticket west)

GeneratorPower wrote:Just to put that giant thunderstorm complex in perspective...the area showing "black" on the IR-channel 4 picture below is approximately 1 degree of LATITUDE and 1 degree of LONGITUDE in size. This is approximately equal to a SINGLE THUNDERSTORM that COVERS AN AREA 70 MILES WIDE BY 70 MILES LONG. That's BIG.

Image
Last edited by jinftl on Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   


Return to “2009”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests