ATL : TROPICAL DEPRESSION ERIKA (06L)

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

#1741 Postby Vortex » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:14 pm

00z NAM rollling in

At H+36 very near if not over the northern Leewards..


http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_036l.gif

H+42 passing just north of the leewards heading generally west.

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_042l.gif

H+60 organized and just ne of PR. Heading w-wnw..

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_060l.gif
Last edited by Vortex on Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
GeneratorPower
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1648
Age: 45
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:48 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1742 Postby GeneratorPower » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:15 pm

jinftl wrote:Impressive.....but the question is, do we have a closed-off circulation? Cloud tops will warm and cool during the day, the key to this system is the need to be developing a closed circulation, not fighting the shear as much, and getting vertically stacked.

Living in South Florida, we see very impressive thunderstorm complexes from time to time....but that doesn't make them developing hurricanes.




Convection like that will help to FORM an LLC and tighten the system up. Convection, feeding on warm moist air is what causes tropical systems to grow.
0 likes   

User avatar
storms NC
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 247
Age: 69
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 2:41 pm
Location: Coast of NC & southwest coast of Fla

Re: Re:

#1743 Postby storms NC » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:15 pm

'CaneFreak wrote:
BensonTCwatcher wrote:No, Derek has repeatedly said (and every other met I have seen here) weak (or shallow) systems are steered by lower level flow versus stronger (deeper) systems are steered at higher level flows. It all depends on which way the prevailing wind is flowing at a given atmospheric height. Most of the time, weaker systems are caught in the westerly flow nearer the surface, but they could also be NW or N depending on longitude.

Correct me if I am wrong


Absolutely....to put it more plainly, the stronger the system the more vertical depth it takes up in the atmosphere....thus the need to figure out the steering flow in the upper levels in order to determine in which direction the system will move...however, for most systems the 500 mb flow will work....it is usually a good level for most systems unless they are extremely weak or extremely strong... :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:


Danny was very weak but still went NW to N to NE. So weak really don't have that much to do with it going west. More on steering and troughs etc... :wink: :wink: :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
bevgo
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 634
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 12:46 pm
Location: Ocean Springs, MS

#1744 Postby bevgo » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:15 pm

Is this an invest any longer?
0 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 16023
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

#1745 Postby Kingarabian » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:16 pm

Isnt this thing getting sheared up a little as of now?
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#1746 Postby deltadog03 » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:17 pm

well, if it looks like this in 6-12 hours then it will prolly skip TD status. VERY impressive blow up. Is there a LLC don't really know yet.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1747 Postby Sanibel » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:17 pm

The models should grab it better now.


Total guess: Carolinas.
0 likes   

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re:

#1748 Postby Evil Jeremy » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:18 pm

Kingarabian wrote:Isnt this thing getting sheared up a little as of now?


Apparently so. The shear has died down this evening.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#1749 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:18 pm

if this large area of storms were to quickly dissipate, the thing is toast. There would be too much surface divergence for this to overcome. Something to watch for during the overnight hours
0 likes   

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

#1750 Postby 'CaneFreak » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:18 pm

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic2/real ... oom=&time=

HMMMM...looking at the latest 200mb vorticity map reveals an interesting tidbit...the Upper Low is fragmenting on the eastern side!!! HMMMMMM....what kind of implications might that have? Pro mets comments are welcomed...
0 likes   

User avatar
GeneratorPower
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1648
Age: 45
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:48 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

Re:

#1751 Postby GeneratorPower » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:18 pm

Kingarabian wrote:Isnt this thing getting sheared up a little as of now?


It would be easier to see with a daytime, visible satellite shot. But you can see some of it on the IR. Look for clouds that seem to stream away from the system at high speed. I was looking at the loops earlier and it seemed that the shear had relaxed a little bit. In fact, I believe the relaxation is what enabled the current burst of convection.
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#1752 Postby southerngale » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:19 pm

It's disappeared from the map above... that usually means something is either being dropped or is being upgraded/downgraded, etc. It's still showing Invest on NRL, however.
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1753 Postby jinftl » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:20 pm

As of last reporting, the estimated center was at 15.4N 54.3W.....on the southern edge of the ball of convection.....not saying reformation of the center further north is not possible (although has anyone seen the current shear map), but realizing the center is on the edge of this impressive ball changes my interpretation of the image for sure....

Ivanhater wrote:Image
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23692
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re:

#1754 Postby gatorcane » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:20 pm

Vortex wrote:00z NAM rollling in

At H+36 very near if not over the northern Leewards..


http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_036l.gif

H+42 passing just north of the leewards heading generally west.

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_042l.gif


Trending south some yet again but yet with pretty decent development here. What do you think cycloneye in Puerto Rico?
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145684
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re:

#1755 Postby cycloneye » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:20 pm

southerngale wrote:It's disappeared from the map above... that has always meant something was either dropped or is being upgraded/downgraded, etc. It's still showing Invest on NRL, however.


Also best track has not renumbered yet from 94L to AL06.
0 likes   

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re:

#1756 Postby Evil Jeremy » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:21 pm

southerngale wrote:It's disappeared from the map above... that has always meant something was either dropped or is being upgraded/downgraded, etc. It's still showing Invest on NRL, however.


I doubt it would be downgraded when at code red and convection like this taking place.
0 likes   

User avatar
artist
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9792
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: West Palm

Re:

#1757 Postby artist » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:21 pm

southerngale wrote:It's disappeared from the map above... that has always meant something was either dropped or is being upgraded/downgraded, etc. It's still showing Invest on NRL, however.

it may have disappeared due to marshall clearing the cache trying to get Jimena to show as a cat 4 that she is rather than a cat 5 it had. Go see the thread about this for more info.
viewtopic.php?f=59&t=106427
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1758 Postby jinftl » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:21 pm

why? the center is not under the mass of thunderstorms. Buoy reports do not suggest the center reforming further north. Not sure that a blow-up of thunderstorms will alter the models much until we get a closed circulation.

Sanibel wrote:The models should grab it better now.


Total guess: Carolinas.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11162
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1759 Postby Ivanhater » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:22 pm

I don't see it moving to much further north in the near term

Image
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: Re:

#1760 Postby jinftl » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:24 pm

Hispanola may deliver the k.o. punch at this rate.....

gatorcane wrote:
Vortex wrote:00z NAM rollling in

At H+36 very near if not over the northern Leewards..


http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_036l.gif

H+42 passing just north of the leewards heading generally west.

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_042l.gif


Trending south some yet again but yet with pretty decent development here. What do you think cycloneye in Puerto Rico?
0 likes   


Return to “2009”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests