ATL : TROPICAL DEPRESSION ERIKA (06L)
Moderator: S2k Moderators
00z NAM rollling in
At H+36 very near if not over the northern Leewards..
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_036l.gif
H+42 passing just north of the leewards heading generally west.
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_042l.gif
H+60 organized and just ne of PR. Heading w-wnw..
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_060l.gif
At H+36 very near if not over the northern Leewards..
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_036l.gif
H+42 passing just north of the leewards heading generally west.
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_042l.gif
H+60 organized and just ne of PR. Heading w-wnw..
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_060l.gif
Last edited by Vortex on Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- GeneratorPower
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1648
- Age: 45
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:48 pm
- Location: Huntsville, AL
Re: ATL : INVEST 94L
jinftl wrote:Impressive.....but the question is, do we have a closed-off circulation? Cloud tops will warm and cool during the day, the key to this system is the need to be developing a closed circulation, not fighting the shear as much, and getting vertically stacked.
Living in South Florida, we see very impressive thunderstorm complexes from time to time....but that doesn't make them developing hurricanes.
Convection like that will help to FORM an LLC and tighten the system up. Convection, feeding on warm moist air is what causes tropical systems to grow.
0 likes
- storms NC
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 247
- Age: 69
- Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 2:41 pm
- Location: Coast of NC & southwest coast of Fla
Re: Re:
'CaneFreak wrote:BensonTCwatcher wrote:No, Derek has repeatedly said (and every other met I have seen here) weak (or shallow) systems are steered by lower level flow versus stronger (deeper) systems are steered at higher level flows. It all depends on which way the prevailing wind is flowing at a given atmospheric height. Most of the time, weaker systems are caught in the westerly flow nearer the surface, but they could also be NW or N depending on longitude.
Correct me if I am wrong
Absolutely....to put it more plainly, the stronger the system the more vertical depth it takes up in the atmosphere....thus the need to figure out the steering flow in the upper levels in order to determine in which direction the system will move...however, for most systems the 500 mb flow will work....it is usually a good level for most systems unless they are extremely weak or extremely strong...![]()
![]()
![]()
Danny was very weak but still went NW to N to NE. So weak really don't have that much to do with it going west. More on steering and troughs etc...



0 likes
- Kingarabian
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 16023
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
- Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
- deltadog03
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 3580
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
- Location: Macon, GA
- Evil Jeremy
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5463
- Age: 32
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Re:
Kingarabian wrote:Isnt this thing getting sheared up a little as of now?
Apparently so. The shear has died down this evening.
0 likes
- 'CaneFreak
- Category 5
- Posts: 1486
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
- Location: New Bern, NC
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic2/real ... oom=&time=
HMMMM...looking at the latest 200mb vorticity map reveals an interesting tidbit...the Upper Low is fragmenting on the eastern side!!! HMMMMMM....what kind of implications might that have? Pro mets comments are welcomed...
HMMMM...looking at the latest 200mb vorticity map reveals an interesting tidbit...the Upper Low is fragmenting on the eastern side!!! HMMMMMM....what kind of implications might that have? Pro mets comments are welcomed...
0 likes
- GeneratorPower
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1648
- Age: 45
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:48 pm
- Location: Huntsville, AL
Re:
Kingarabian wrote:Isnt this thing getting sheared up a little as of now?
It would be easier to see with a daytime, visible satellite shot. But you can see some of it on the IR. Look for clouds that seem to stream away from the system at high speed. I was looking at the loops earlier and it seemed that the shear had relaxed a little bit. In fact, I believe the relaxation is what enabled the current burst of convection.
0 likes
- southerngale
- Retired Staff
- Posts: 27418
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
- Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)
Re: ATL : INVEST 94L
As of last reporting, the estimated center was at 15.4N 54.3W.....on the southern edge of the ball of convection.....not saying reformation of the center further north is not possible (although has anyone seen the current shear map), but realizing the center is on the edge of this impressive ball changes my interpretation of the image for sure....
Ivanhater wrote:
0 likes
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23692
- Age: 47
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
Re:
Vortex wrote:00z NAM rollling in
At H+36 very near if not over the northern Leewards..
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_036l.gif
H+42 passing just north of the leewards heading generally west.
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_042l.gif
Trending south some yet again but yet with pretty decent development here. What do you think cycloneye in Puerto Rico?
0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 145684
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re:
southerngale wrote:It's disappeared from the map above... that has always meant something was either dropped or is being upgraded/downgraded, etc. It's still showing Invest on NRL, however.
Also best track has not renumbered yet from 94L to AL06.
0 likes
- Evil Jeremy
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5463
- Age: 32
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Re:
southerngale wrote:It's disappeared from the map above... that has always meant something was either dropped or is being upgraded/downgraded, etc. It's still showing Invest on NRL, however.
I doubt it would be downgraded when at code red and convection like this taking place.
0 likes
Re:
southerngale wrote:It's disappeared from the map above... that has always meant something was either dropped or is being upgraded/downgraded, etc. It's still showing Invest on NRL, however.
it may have disappeared due to marshall clearing the cache trying to get Jimena to show as a cat 4 that she is rather than a cat 5 it had. Go see the thread about this for more info.
viewtopic.php?f=59&t=106427
0 likes
Re: ATL : INVEST 94L
why? the center is not under the mass of thunderstorms. Buoy reports do not suggest the center reforming further north. Not sure that a blow-up of thunderstorms will alter the models much until we get a closed circulation.
Sanibel wrote:The models should grab it better now.
Total guess: Carolinas.
0 likes
Re: Re:
Hispanola may deliver the k.o. punch at this rate.....
gatorcane wrote:Vortex wrote:00z NAM rollling in
At H+36 very near if not over the northern Leewards..
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_036l.gif
H+42 passing just north of the leewards heading generally west.
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_042l.gif
Trending south some yet again but yet with pretty decent development here. What do you think cycloneye in Puerto Rico?
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests