ATL : TROPICAL DEPRESSION ERIKA (06L)

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#1841 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:48 pm

what really sucks.. is we only get one more image then we hit the eclipse.. :(
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re:

#1842 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:52 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:and keep in mind, models are in general agreement about recurve in about 5 days. may have the first true fish storm



wow.. that is completely backwards.. not sure what models you are looking at but the only one out to see is the cmc ..

well let me rephrase the only that does not threaten land first..

and well if this does make to depression in the morning it will be most likely crossing near or over the NE islands..

so fish ??? dont think so not at least when it comes to models..
0 likes   

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L - Computer Models

#1843 Postby Evil Jeremy » Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:55 pm

boca wrote:We can't discount the CMC model either since they upgraded just recently.


But we still don't know how well the new CMC is. It has not had that much to be tested on this season, and even with 94L it has been intensifying it unnecessarily deeply over the past runs.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#1844 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:57 pm

CMC intensifies this north of the Caribbean

also, remember the EURO that many here worship, also has this turning to affect only the sharks and barracudas

but then again, a model that indicates recurve can never be correct... can it?
0 likes   

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5277
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1845 Postby PTrackerLA » Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:57 pm

Does not seem to be moving much right now, and what little movement is seen by IR sat appears to be NW. Could just be the shear creating that illusion. Excellent looking Invest tonight though!
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L - Computer Models

#1846 Postby Bocadude85 » Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:59 pm

Evil Jeremy wrote:
boca wrote:We can't discount the CMC model either since they upgraded just recently.


But we still don't know how well the new CMC is. It has not had that much to be tested on this season, and even with 94L it has been intensifying it unnecessarily deeply over the past runs.


Also the CMC has Jimena missing the Baja and moving WNW which would make me think this is not the best model to use for future track.
0 likes   

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re:

#1847 Postby Evil Jeremy » Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:59 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:CMC intensifies this north of the Caribbean

also, remember the EURO that many here worship, also has this turning to affect only the sharks and barracudas

but then again, a model that indicates recurve can never be correct... can it?


Well, when you say "models are in general agreement", you make it sound like a majority or even a good chunk are showing this, when it is only just a few.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: Re:

#1848 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:00 pm

Evil Jeremy wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:CMC intensifies this north of the Caribbean

also, remember the EURO that many here worship, also has this turning to affect only the sharks and barracudas

but then again, a model that indicates recurve can never be correct... can it?


Well, when you say "models are in general agreement", you make it sound like a majority or even a good chunk are showing this, when it is only just a few.


I don't count the BAM suite as real models
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re:

#1849 Postby Bocadude85 » Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:01 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:CMC intensifies this north of the Caribbean

also, remember the EURO that many here worship, also has this turning to affect only the sharks and barracudas

but then again, a model that indicates recurve can never be correct... can it?


It seems to me that the models that actually do threaten land are written off more then the models that recurve. Atleast seems that way to me this season.
0 likes   

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Re:

#1850 Postby Evil Jeremy » Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:05 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:
Evil Jeremy wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:CMC intensifies this north of the Caribbean

also, remember the EURO that many here worship, also has this turning to affect only the sharks and barracudas

but then again, a model that indicates recurve can never be correct... can it?


Well, when you say "models are in general agreement", you make it sound like a majority or even a good chunk are showing this, when it is only just a few.


I don't count the BAM suite as real models


No, but the HWRF, GFS, NOGAPS, and the UKMET don't show recurve, and even the CMC isn't the best preforming model out there, even with its upgrades. All I am saying is that you made it sound like a majority of the models were showing recurve rather than just a few.
0 likes   

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

Re: Re:

#1851 Postby 'CaneFreak » Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:09 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:
Evil Jeremy wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:CMC intensifies this north of the Caribbean

also, remember the EURO that many here worship, also has this turning to affect only the sharks and barracudas

but then again, a model that indicates recurve can never be correct... can it?


Well, when you say "models are in general agreement", you make it sound like a majority or even a good chunk are showing this, when it is only just a few.


I don't count the BAM suite as real models


Actually, the BAM suite does pretty well in the deep tropics....it has performed the best with this system thus far...(probably because it has been rather weak)

The numbers don't lie Ortt...

http://hurricane.methaz.org/tracking/st ... _perf.html

Oh and you said this thing was going to stay weak earlier....are you changing your tune? If this stays weak...its headed west...
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20016
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1852 Postby tolakram » Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:09 pm

Shortwave/Visible clearly shows the shear and the LLC looks to be getting more exposed.

Loop:
http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... _floater_2

Image
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1853 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:12 pm

alrighty.. latest microwave again..

its becoming pretty clear we have a closed circ.. this image was a couple hours ago but shows clear banding and the center on the western edge of the convection but it does not mean that it wont be pulled under the convection or reform either thats just what we have at the moment. we will know more in a couple hours when the hi resolution microwaves come out again and hopefully they are good passes, also fom the images i made earlier it has not moved very much ..

original link
http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc09/A ... W.69pc.jpg

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#1854 Postby deltadog03 » Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:13 pm

Good finds both of yall...It looks like we have a LLC, but should either reform or push back in closer to that very deep convection. I also see some fanning out on the W quad of this. Tells me shear is lessoning.
0 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6369
Age: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1855 Postby boca » Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:13 pm

tolakram wrote:Shortwave/Visible clearly shows the shear and the LLC looks to be getting more exposed.

Loop:
http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... _floater_2

Image


Great image,it looks like theirs infow coming into it from the south.It looks heathly right now but it could look like a skeleton in the morning.
0 likes   

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

#1856 Postby Evil Jeremy » Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:14 pm

TD by 11 in the morning, calling it now lol. Now let me start preparing my Crow for lunch tomorrow. I have enough time to prepare it in advance to make it nice and tasty.
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1857 Postby Bocadude85 » Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:15 pm

tolakram wrote:Shortwave/Visible clearly shows the shear and the LLC looks to be getting more exposed.

Loop:
http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... _floater_2

Image


Yup does seem the LLC is exposed and on the SW side of the convection.
0 likes   

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

Re:

#1858 Postby 'CaneFreak » Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:18 pm

Evil Jeremy wrote:TD by 11 in the morning, calling it now lol. Now let me start preparing my Crow for lunch tomorrow. I have enough time to prepare it in advance to make it nice and tasty.


Shhhhhhhhh.....stop jinxing it...LOL....
0 likes   

CYCLONE MIKE
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2183
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: Gonzales, LA

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L - Computer Models

#1859 Postby CYCLONE MIKE » Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:18 pm

Please correct me if i'm wrong about this, but wasn't the cmc the model that showed south louisiana getting slammed by three storms in a row earlier this month? Believe it was Ana, Bill, and Claudette.
0 likes   

MWatkins
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:51 pm
Location: SE Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#1860 Postby MWatkins » Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:19 pm

I have no doubt, at all, that this is a depression and probably Erika already.

Waves don't produce circular, -80 degree cloud tops like this. Even if it lasts 24 hours (and I could be eating crow if it doesn't) if it smells like a TC, looks like a TC and produces cold cloud tops like this...

Maybe they are waiting to see if the tops get sheared out. It still looks a lot like Irene did when it passed over SFL in 99, even if the thunderstorms are displaced to the east of the LLC.

MW
0 likes   


Return to “2009”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests