
ATL : TROPICAL DEPRESSION ERIKA (06L)
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- HURAKAN
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 46086
- Age: 38
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
- Location: Key West, FL
- Contact:
First we need to see this system develop and then we can talk about the future. A lot of people are already talking about a US landfall. At the moment, there's nothing to indicate that will happen. Everyone should know that the first computer runs are not very reliable and we need to see more of them. There is a lot of time. Don't let the panic reign!!!
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm
Re:
Derek Ortt wrote:large differences in the BAM models equals strong shear
Please explain.
(Thanks by the way for your constant input and tolerance of us amateurs.)
0 likes
- Emmett_Brown
- Category 5
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
- Location: Sarasota FL
Re: ATL : INVEST 94L
Very little data available yet, the last Quikscat pass missed 94L. Where Bill clearly had some rotation at this stage, it is less obvious with this wave, so my gut feeling is that it will be another 48 hours before TD. Probably around 40W.
0 likes
Re: ATL : INVEST 94L
Hope it recurves. Something about this one reminds me of a nasty little hurricane.
GFS finally recognizes it but keeps it as a weak minor cyclone.
CMC tracks it low towards Caribbean even though the weaknesses are still there off the east coast. GFS more towards recurve off east coast.
GFS finally recognizes it but keeps it as a weak minor cyclone.
CMC tracks it low towards Caribbean even though the weaknesses are still there off the east coast. GFS more towards recurve off east coast.
0 likes
- Evil Jeremy
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5463
- Age: 31
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Re: Re:
sandyb wrote:Dean4Storms wrote:I noticed the CMC is pretty much in the same camp as these models, holding the ridge and driving it toward the Islands.
dont look at cmc its never right as we have seen with danny
Very few of the models were right with Danny, and the CMC has been much better this year than it has previously.
0 likes
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 529
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 6:38 am
Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

Nice convection, potential she is compact and already has the "look". I don't think the same weather pattern is going to be in place in a week when whatever this turns out to be gets into the carribbean.
Lemme have a peek at the gfs and see where the trough and the high will be sitting in 72.
0 likes
Re: ATL : INVEST 94L
The red IR and slight curvature are the give aways. I think the board will be busy in a couple of days over this one.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm
Re:
Derek Ortt wrote:not that impressed. Convection seems more associated with the ITCZ
Yeah, it is pretty close to the ITCZ but you really think that large circular blob is just being fed by the ITCZ? It looks fairly self contained to me.
Last edited by otowntiger on Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:01 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes
Re: Re:
sandyb wrote:Dean4Storms wrote:I noticed the CMC is pretty much in the same camp as these models, holding the ridge and driving it toward the Islands.
dont look at cmc its never right as we have seen with danny
Thats incorrect. CMC is a good model.
0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 143867
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: ATL : INVEST 94L
A good example of a low latitud system that developed was Ivan.It started more south than where 94L is.
Code: Select all
Date: 02-24 SEP 2004
Hurricane IVAN
ADV LAT LON TIME WIND PR STAT
1 9.70 -29.10 09/02/21Z 25 1009 TROPICAL DEPRESSION
2 9.80 -29.40 09/03/03Z 25 1009 TROPICAL DEPRESSION
3 10.00 -30.70 09/03/09Z 35 1005 TROPICAL STORM
4 9.60 -32.90 09/03/15Z 40 1003 TROPICAL STORM
5 8.90 -34.60 09/03/21Z 45 1000 TROPICAL STORM
6 9.10 -35.80 09/04/03Z 45 999 TROPICAL STORM
7 9.00 -37.40 09/04/09Z 50 997 TROPICAL STORM
8 8.90 -38.90 09/04/15Z 50 997 TROPICAL STORM
9 9.10 -40.80 09/04/21Z 50 994 TROPICAL STORM
10 9.40 -42.20 09/05/03Z 60 991 TROPICAL STORM
11 9.70 -44.30 09/05/09Z 65 987 HURRICANE-1
12 9.90 -46.00 09/05/15Z 75 980 HURRICANE-1
13 10.10 -46.60 09/05/17Z 100 960 HURRICANE-3
14 10.40 -47.70 09/05/21Z 110 950 HURRICANE-3
14A 10.60 -48.50 09/06/00Z 115 948 HURRICANE-4
15 10.80 -49.40 09/06/03Z 115 948 HURRICANE-4
0 likes
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5
- Posts: 5194
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
Re: ATL : INVEST 94L
The fact that this is staying weak and so far south makes me believe that it won't recurve like the others.....
0 likes
-
- Admin
- Posts: 19990
- Age: 61
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: ATL : INVEST 94L - Computer Models
This looks like a good place to post a tidbit from Jeff Masters blog.
From:
http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMa ... rynum=1295

Figure 2. Performance of the main models used to forecast Hurricane Bill. Forecasts for the time periods 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours are shown, with the track errors for each models' forecasts in nautical miles (nm). The statistics are shown for the regular interpolated version of the models used by the NHC forecasters in real time to make their forecasts. The "Consensus" model is the NHC's TVCN consensus, which is the average of at least two of the other models shown here (but not including the Canadian model). The Canadian model had the best performance of any model for Bill, surpassing even the Official NHC forecast. The next best performing models were the GFDL and GFS. Last year's best performing model, the European Center model, was not available for this analysis. Image credit: Dr. Jim Goerss, Navy Research Lab, Monterey.
From:
http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMa ... rynum=1295

Figure 2. Performance of the main models used to forecast Hurricane Bill. Forecasts for the time periods 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours are shown, with the track errors for each models' forecasts in nautical miles (nm). The statistics are shown for the regular interpolated version of the models used by the NHC forecasters in real time to make their forecasts. The "Consensus" model is the NHC's TVCN consensus, which is the average of at least two of the other models shown here (but not including the Canadian model). The Canadian model had the best performance of any model for Bill, surpassing even the Official NHC forecast. The next best performing models were the GFDL and GFS. Last year's best performing model, the European Center model, was not available for this analysis. Image credit: Dr. Jim Goerss, Navy Research Lab, Monterey.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1289
- Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:26 pm
- Location: Newark, Nottinghamshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: ATL : INVEST 94L
ConvergenceZone wrote:The fact that this is staying weak and so far south makes me believe that it won't recurve like the others.....
Yeah, that occurred to me too.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests