DESTRUCTION5 wrote:12z going more conventional with a Panhandle landfall and turning her in to a MONSTER Noreaster rater than the dive SE....
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... n_072l.gif
Yep, my concern is growing by the hour!
Moderator: S2k Moderators
DESTRUCTION5 wrote:12z going more conventional with a Panhandle landfall and turning her in to a MONSTER Noreaster rater than the dive SE....
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... n_072l.gif
cycloneye wrote:deltadog03 wrote:I find it interesting that recon is flying at 400mb level right now on there way to IDA and in there obs there are indicating that the winds are only 23kt at that level. Not too bad right now over the northern gom.
Winds increasing in the central gulf.160200 2516N 08747W 3928 07683 0371 -177 -225 117041 043 031 000 00
160230 2514N 08746W 3925 07691 0369 -181 -225 122039 041 032 000 00
160300 2512N 08745W 3926 07674 0372 -180 -225 137038 039 031 000 00
$$
Aric Dunn wrote:shear continues to drop rather fast almost to the gulf coast..
curtadams wrote:I can think of another reason for hurricane warnings only for LA and MS. For Ida to landfall as a hurricane the front will probably have to slow or weaken - meaning Ida will move more W as well. If Ida gets smacked over to the Panhandle by 40 kt shear she's very unlikely to be a hurricane or even tropical - so much less likelihood of a hurricane strike and no warning.
Ivanhater wrote:I noticed the Hurricane watch only extends to the MS/AL border. Is that supposed to extend east as it gets closer cause landfall is still showing the Pensacola area?
Ivanhater wrote:Ivanhater wrote:I noticed the Hurricane watch only extends to the MS/AL border. Is that supposed to extend east as it gets closer cause landfall is still showing the Pensacola area?
Anybody know? lol
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests