ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1061 Postby Air Force Met » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:14 pm

drezee wrote:Enjoy ladies and gentlemen...you are watching cyclogenesis...pressures are falling like a rock now...LLC will form East of the current 18z position, IMO

It is all relative. For a LLC with no convection this is like a rock. 30mb in 6 hours is only for very well established convective tropical cyclones.

Atmospheric Pressure (PRES): 1007.2 mb
Pressure Tendency (PTDY): -2.2 mb ( Falling )


I agree...this is on its way now. The broad low has stoped moving west and is now getting pulled back to the east towards the convection. You can also see the low level cu field along the 15 latitude from 80-82W beginning to veer as the pressures are lowering. Something is going to try and get going near 16/80...whether its a new low or the weak low getting sucked under...I feel pretty confident now...thinking 80-85% chance.
0 likes   

rockyman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1967
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:24 pm
Location: Dauphin Island, AL

#1062 Postby rockyman » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:14 pm

Wow! I've spent the last 4 hours browsing the board but neglected to run IR sat loops...I just did, and the difference is amazing...convection is really blossoming near the "old center"
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145382
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1063 Postby cycloneye » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:23 pm

AFM ,do you think NHC may issue a special TWO or they will wait to the 8 PM one and up the %? IMO I say at next TWO will be 50%.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

crimi481
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 602
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:47 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1064 Postby crimi481 » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:24 pm

I thing its good to "pull away" -with wide sat loop - then go zoom crazy
0 likes   

User avatar
Clint_TX
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu May 01, 2003 8:31 am

#1065 Postby Clint_TX » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:25 pm

AFM, I'm still thinking there's a real shot of it going east of us, the models mishandling summer troughs notwithstanding. It just looks like there will be little keeping it from going north. Thoughts?
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4822
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1066 Postby ronjon » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:25 pm

I agree AFM. The LLC is becoming elongated east-west and will probably relocate under the heavy convection just to its east. After that occurs, we'll probably have a tropical cyclone.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-vis.html
0 likes   

I-wall
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:24 pm

#1067 Postby I-wall » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:26 pm

Could a new LLC be forming under that blob of convection southwest of Jamaica?
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1068 Postby Air Force Met » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:26 pm

cycloneye wrote:AFM ,do you think NHC may issue a special TWO or they will wait to the 8 PM one and up the %? IMO I say at next TWO will be 50%.


They will wait...but I would expect at least a 50%...if not a 60% or higher.
0 likes   

I-wall
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:24 pm

#1069 Postby I-wall » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:28 pm

If a depression does form, wouldnt it just continue going west or WNW? I thought only the stronger systems were pulled north by approaching troughs?
0 likes   

rockyman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1967
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:24 pm
Location: Dauphin Island, AL

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1070 Postby rockyman » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:30 pm

Since 93L has taken so long to develop, it will potentially be within "5 day striking distance" of the CONUS. With that in mind (especially this year with the oil), I would imagine the NHC will spend even more time than usual on their first forecast.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re:

#1071 Postby Air Force Met » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:31 pm

Clint_TX wrote:AFM, I'm still thinking there's a real shot of it going east of us, the models mishandling summer troughs notwithstanding. It just looks like there will be little keeping it from going north. Thoughts?


Hey clint...


I think there is a chance it will get pulled north...but stall. I am really sold on the Euro solution to the upper air and it really doesn't like the trof...and neither do I. Even the HGX guys say they think the GFS solution on pulling a front through here is out to lunch...and that is the problem I am having. The GFS is so bullish on the trof is gives us FROPA and I just can't buy into that solution. So...either the EURO will be right and the ridge weakens enough to allow Alex (to be) to head towards BRO/CRP...or there may be an in between solution where it gets pulled north then stalls...then moves west as the ridge builds back on Wednesday....
0 likes   

Ikester
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 361
Age: 39
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1072 Postby Ikester » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:32 pm

rockyman wrote:Since 93L has taken so long to develop, it will potentially be within "5 day striking distance" of the CONUS. With that in mind (especially this year with the oil), I would imagine the NHC will spend even more time than usual on their first forecast.


Keep in mind that there are new changes this year. The cone is narrower and watches and warnings are hoisted 48 and 36 hours in advance, respectively.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re:

#1073 Postby Air Force Met » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:35 pm

I-wall wrote:Could a new LLC be forming under that blob of convection southwest of Jamaica?


Yes...that is where something is happening. It is trying to pull the low under it...but it may also be forming its own low on its own.

Take a look at the cu field near 15-16N and 82W...watch how it is now trying to move east. Also note how the cu field is veering with time along 15N and 79-82W

http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/get-goes?satellite=GOES-E%20CONUS&lat=16&lon=-80&info=vis&zoom=1&width=2800&height=2000&type=Animation&numframes=20&map=latlon
0 likes   

User avatar
Iune
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 291
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 12:23 pm
Location: New York City

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1074 Postby Iune » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:35 pm

Image of storm:
Image
0 likes   
Floyd 1999 · Irene 2011 · Sandy 2012

SunnyThoughts
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2263
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Pensacola, Florida

#1075 Postby SunnyThoughts » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:36 pm

Well, when AFM speaks...I certainly listen. I respect him immensely as a met as well as the other mets on this site.. Thanks AFM for your participation on this site. WE definitely need your analysis this year, where the GOM is concerned.
0 likes   

Florida1118

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1076 Postby Florida1118 » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:37 pm

I like how we started off " It has a good chance of development" then " It looks like crap, it wont do anything" and just going back and forth for the whole forum.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#1077 Postby KWT » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:38 pm

I'd go for a 60% now from the NHC, they seem to be rather keen on going to a high chance once they see a LLC developing with the models suggesting development.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

SunnyThoughts
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2263
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Pensacola, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1078 Postby SunnyThoughts » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:38 pm

rockyman wrote:Since 93L has taken so long to develop, it will potentially be within "5 day striking distance" of the CONUS. With that in mind (especially this year with the oil), I would imagine the NHC will spend even more time than usual on their first forecast.



I totally agree, I heard where the folks working on the relief wells need a fairly big lead time in order to prepare and get out of the way.
0 likes   

User avatar
antonlsu
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 37
Age: 35
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:34 pm
Location: Galveston, Tx / Baton Rouge, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1079 Postby antonlsu » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:39 pm

Looks like she is finally getting her act together, should be interesting to see how much she develops tonight.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1080 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:40 pm

Florida1118 wrote:I like how we started off " It has a good chance of development" then " It looks like crap, it wont do anything" and just going back and forth for the whole forum.


Welcome to the Hurricane Season!!!
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests