fci wrote:Migle wrote:ROCK wrote:[
Rock you should look back at prior posts in this, and other; threads before you leap to STS's defense
not leaping...I see a new guy needing guidance...thats all.....
Moderator: S2k Moderators
fci wrote:Migle wrote:ROCK wrote:[
Rock you should look back at prior posts in this, and other; threads before you leap to STS's defense
Florida1118 wrote:Please can we stop talking about STS? How would anyone like it if you came back to a thread and find nearly a page about what you did/didnt say? Im willing to bet a mod or Admins gonna come wide out our post...So lets not create anymore post that will just be deleted.
Wx_Warrior wrote:Ignorance that one would think that Gaston won't develop? WOW
Wx_Warrior wrote:Ignorance that one would think that Gaston won't develop? WOW
Florida1118 wrote:Wx_Warrior wrote:Ignorance that one would think that Gaston won't develop? WOW
Eh. As of this moment most of the models dont see Gaston at all. And weve seen 70-80% systems crash and burn. I dont think its ignorance. I think as of now its guessing.
fasterdisaster wrote:Florida1118 wrote:Wx_Warrior wrote:Ignorance that one would think that Gaston won't develop? WOW
Eh. As of this moment most of the models dont see Gaston at all. And weve seen 70-80% systems crash and burn. I dont think its ignorance. I think as of now its guessing.
The models that don't develop him are the global models that probably are barely detecting Gaston's circulation. Ignorance might have been too loaded a word, but I do think there's far more observational and factual evidence supporting redevelopment than otherwise.
fci wrote:Thanks for stepping away from the "ignorance" label. It has been like 3 days now that the odds have been 60%-80% and still nothing yet.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests