ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#161 Postby clfenwi » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:09 am

12Z Best Track

AL, 96, 2010070512, , BEST, 0, 211N, 857W, 25, 1009
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#162 Postby tailgater » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:12 am

tolakram wrote:I like to follow MIMIC-TPW, and it appears to put the spin near the Gulf.

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Somewhere near this convection I assume.

Loop: http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ge ... umframes=5

Image

Yeah, just looking at the Visible loop this morning the trough is in the Yucatan pass and southerly winds in the NW Caribbean
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143871
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#163 Postby cycloneye » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:13 am

clfenwi wrote:12Z Best Track

AL, 96, 2010070512, , BEST, 0, 211N, 857W, 25, 1009


That is a big relocation from the last position at 06z 17.3N-83.3W.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

redfish1
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 125
Age: 44
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:24 pm
Location: Port Arthur, Tx

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#164 Postby redfish1 » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:21 am

cycloneye wrote:
clfenwi wrote:12Z Best Track

AL, 96, 2010070512, , BEST, 0, 211N, 857W, 25, 1009


That is a big relocation from the last position at 06z 17.3N-83.3W.


if thats the case would it have a better chance of going more north since it is getting closer to 95L?









l
0 likes   

User avatar
mvtrucking
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 698
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 10:01 am
Location: Monroe,La

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#165 Postby mvtrucking » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:26 am

redfish1 wrote:
if thats the case would it have a better chance of going more north since it is getting closer to 95L?


No way of knowing right now, just have to watch & wait to see what happens with this wave.
0 likes   

User avatar
Fego
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 767
Age: 65
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 7:58 pm
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#166 Postby Fego » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:36 am

mvtrucking wrote:
redfish1 wrote:
if thats the case would it have a better chance of going more north since it is getting closer to 95L?


No way of knowing right now, just have to watch & wait to see what happens with this wave.


Talking about getting closer or not to 95L, here is an extract from todays marine weather discussion.
THE TROPICAL WAVE IN THE WESTERN CARIBBEAN IS EXPECTED TO PASS
THROUGH THE YUCATAN CHANNEL TODAY. MUCH OF THE GLOBAL GUIDANCE
ALLOWS THE MID LEVEL ENERGY ON THE NORTHERN EDGE OF THIS WAVE TO
BE LURED NORTHWARD INTO THE WEAK TROUGHING ASSOCIATED WITH THE
LOW LINGERING IN THE N CENTRAL GULF. THE OPERATIONAL GFS HAS
BEEN MORE CONSISTENT WITH THIS SOLUTION THAN ECMWF
. THE 00Z
ECMWF HAS NOW TRENDED TOWARD THE GFS...ABANDONING ITS MORE
CLOSED OFF SOLUTION FROM 1200 UTC THAT CARRIED A STRENGTHENING
LOW CENTER NW ACROSS THE WESTERN GULF...WELL SEPARATED FROM THE
TROUGHING ASSOCIATED WITH THE LOW CURRENTLY IN THE N CENTRAL
GULF. NOW THAT THERE IS MORE AGREEMENT AMONG THE GUIDANCE ON
ALLOWING THE TROUGHING TO THE N TO INFLUENCE THE TIMING OF AND
STRENGTH OF THE SYSTEM...CONFIDENCE HAS BECOME HIGHER IN A TRACK
THAT IS SLIGHTLY MORE TO THE E THAN PREVIOUSLY FORECAST. THIS
SOLUTION ALSO SUGGESTS A MORE ELONGATED LOW LEVEL CIRCULATION
TRACKING NORTH-NORTHWESTWARD FROM THE YUCATAN CHANNEL.
HOWEVER...THE PRES GRADIENT ON THE E SIDE OF THE SYSTEM BETWEEN
IT AND RIDGING OVER THE NE GULF WILL ALLOW FOR SOUTHERLY WINDS
TO BUILD TO THE 25-30 KT RANGE IN THE CENTRAL GULF. THE GFS
PARALLEL AND ECMWF ARE CONSIDERABLY SLOWER THAN THE OPERATIONAL
GFS AND THE UKMET TO CARRY THE SYSTEM NORTHWARD. THE GFS AND
UKMET MAY BE GIVING MUCH MORE CREDIT TO THE TROUGHING CURRENTLY
IN THE CENTRAL GULF THAN IT WARRANTS...SO THE SLOWER SOLUTIONS
SEEM MORE REASONABLE. THE PMDHMD FROM HPC PREFERS THE SLOWER
SOLUTIONS. THEY RECOMMENDED THE 00Z ECMWF AND GFS ENSEMBLE MEAN
SOLUTIONS WHICH SEEMS REASONABLE.
0 likes   
Go Giants! Go Niners! Go Warriors!

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#167 Postby KWT » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:36 am

They've moved the center towards the northern convective region, if that is where the system develops then a landfall in Texas/LA is odds on, but to be honest I don't think we will get anything too potent from this if it does decide to develop, I'm thinking between 45-50kts at the moment.

edit---in fact they've gone way north of even that convective region, there is clearly southerly winds in the Yucatan channel but if thats where they think the center is, its going to have a tough time developing at all because it really is well shunted away from any convection right now...looks like an MLC is present with the convection at the moment as well.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

redfish1
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 125
Age: 44
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:24 pm
Location: Port Arthur, Tx

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#168 Postby redfish1 » Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:27 am

does anyone think 96L will get its act together today?
0 likes   

User avatar
johngaltfla
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 9:17 pm
Location: Sarasota County, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#169 Postby johngaltfla » Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:31 am

redfish1 wrote:does anyone think 96L will get its act together today?


I wish we knew. Recon will tell everyone a lot about it, but right now it looks like a mess. After more data is received the pros here will weigh in with some excellent analysis as they did during Alex.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#170 Postby Sanibel » Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:42 am

If it heads north it will head into the same dry air issues 95L is dealing with.


We'll see if 96L gets it together like Alex did despite its disorganization.
0 likes   

redfish1
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 125
Age: 44
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:24 pm
Location: Port Arthur, Tx

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#171 Postby redfish1 » Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:55 am

what kind of environment is 96L in right now is it conducive for further development?
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#172 Postby KWT » Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:55 am

redfish1 wrote:does anyone think 96L will get its act together today?


Well its taken a step backwards today it seems so its unlikely we will see it develop today. I still think it'll probably develop but its not quite so likely as it was this time yesterday though...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#173 Postby Sanibel » Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:00 am

I think we could be seeing a little too close to Alex syndrome.


What I don't understand is if the overhead is good why the convection is so discomblobulated?
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#174 Postby KWT » Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:01 am

I'm not sure Sanibel because I've not had a good look at the uppers today but usually if it looks like something is stopping the convection from getting going, then there must be something aloft that is preventing it from developing.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9483
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#175 Postby ROCK » Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:03 am

the voricity is up around the the Yucatan channel while the convection is still to the south...not sure what to make of it. Looked like a go yesterday.....

thanks Hurak...I was looking for that map....why would the BAMMS initialize so far north is what I dont understand....
Last edited by ROCK on Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#176 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:05 am

Image

vorticity remains strong

Image

wind shear isn't bad
0 likes   

redfish1
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 125
Age: 44
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:24 pm
Location: Port Arthur, Tx

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#177 Postby redfish1 » Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:07 am

may just be a matter of time before convection starts wrapping around it....just an uneducated guess
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#178 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:09 am

Image

There is some mid-level shear, maybe that's the problem
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#179 Postby HouTXmetro » Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:13 am

so happy 96L fell apart last night :D

Seems like there is new convection developing where the NHC places the Low.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

User avatar
mvtrucking
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 698
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 10:01 am
Location: Monroe,La

Re:

#180 Postby mvtrucking » Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:17 am

HURAKAN wrote:
Image

wind shear isn't bad


Hurakan,
Am I reading this right? (About 20 kts NW over 96L )Thanks in advance
Last edited by mvtrucking on Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests