ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Texas Snowman
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 6180
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:29 am
Location: Denison, Texas

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#2721 Postby Texas Snowman » Sun Jun 27, 2010 10:32 pm

LSU2001 wrote:I think it was Humberto. I remember it was kind of a non player then all of a sudden it exploded into a cane.
Thanks a bunch I knew someone would help me out.
Tim



Humberto didn't go to Cat 3 status though. 90 mph was top wind speed.

Now Hurricane Bret in 199 went from being classified as a Cat 1 to a 145 mph Cat 4 in something between 24 and 48 hours.
0 likes   
The above post and any post by Texas Snowman is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to NWS products.

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5316
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - DISCUSSION

#2722 Postby Ptarmigan » Sun Jun 27, 2010 10:32 pm

TeamPlayersBlue wrote:
LSU2001 wrote:Does anyone remember the storm several years ago that went from a Tropical Storm to a Cat 3 Hurricane in like 24 hours or something like that. I remember the storm but can't remember the name. I think Alex may try his hand at some RI as it moves away from the Yucatan.
Thanks in advance,
Tim


Is it Humberto from 2007? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Humberto_(2007)

I follow the waves in the atlantic very closely and i remember that morening it literally popped up! I was like, "um wow, that could be a hurricane pretty quickly." At the time it was barely a depression, but i remember that storm had a nice circulation, great "balance" (the eye was in the middle of the circulation and not the NW side of the storm like many young TS's in the gulf. Sure enough, that night, it made it to 90 mph. We had a beach hous in Crystal beach so we became worried but, the storm surge was minimal. Had 75 mph winds and only lost some shingles. I'm going to look for some youtube vids of the storm coming ashore. Many thought the storm had wind gusts to 115 as it made landfall!

In regards to Alex, i dont expect the same thing to happen since Humberto was in Sept., but Alex has a broad circulation and the eye is in the middle of the Low, so it can strengthen quickly

(sorry for going slightly off topic)


Humberto was a Category 1 at landfall. Also, it was much smaller than Alex, with tropical storm force winds extending up to 60 miles. Also, Bret in 1999 intensified quickly and it too was a small hurricane.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#2723 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Jun 27, 2010 10:33 pm

Image

If TS winds are affecting the Yucatan peninsula, shouldn't this area be under a tropical storm warning?
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145813
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#2724 Postby cycloneye » Sun Jun 27, 2010 10:34 pm

HURAKAN,good catch,interesting.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Texas Snowman
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 6180
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:29 am
Location: Denison, Texas

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#2725 Postby Texas Snowman » Sun Jun 27, 2010 10:35 pm

Ivanhater wrote:Image



Ok, I'm sure there is something I'm missing here. But from the looks of those t-storm cloud tops over Mexico shooting off to the NE, why wouldn't that also tend to pull Alex further to the north?
0 likes   
The above post and any post by Texas Snowman is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to NWS products.

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re:

#2726 Postby ozonepete » Sun Jun 27, 2010 10:37 pm

HURAKAN wrote:Image

If TS winds are affecting the Yucatan peninsula, shouldn't this area be under a tropical storm warning?



Very good catch.
0 likes   

Javlin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1621
Age: 64
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 7:58 pm
Location: ms gulf coast

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#2727 Postby Javlin » Sun Jun 27, 2010 10:41 pm

Texas Snowman wrote:
Ivanhater wrote:Image



Ok, I'm sure there is something I'm missing here. But from the looks of those t-storm cloud tops over Mexico shooting off to the NE, why wouldn't that also tend to pull Alex further to the north?


My contention earlier in another post but he does seem stationary for the last couple of hours??change in direction??
0 likes   

Ikester
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 361
Age: 39
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#2728 Postby Ikester » Sun Jun 27, 2010 10:42 pm

Just so everybody understands, Miami has no control over watches and warnings on foreign coast lines...it's up to each individual government to do that.
0 likes   

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4769
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

#2729 Postby psyclone » Sun Jun 27, 2010 10:44 pm

those windfield graphics always seem to be waaaay overcooked. according to that pic, a good chunk of land area is experiencing ts conditions. i bet ground truth is far different...obs from merida or progresso or campeche would be telling.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#2730 Postby brunota2003 » Sun Jun 27, 2010 10:45 pm

the winds...if they were in a marine environment...very well may be TS force.
0 likes   

curtadams
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

#2731 Postby curtadams » Sun Jun 27, 2010 10:52 pm

Convection is collapsing NW of the center in a way that makes me think "mid level dry air intrusion". That may be why the global keep Alex weak.
0 likes   

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#2732 Postby hurricaneCW » Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:00 pm

I don't see any dry air intrusion, the core is just building up, in fact there is some intense convective bursting occurring right around the center. Alex is still near land so some of the inflow is cut off but once it starts moving it should organize quite rapidly in a very favorable environment.
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re:

#2733 Postby ConvergenceZone » Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:00 pm

curtadams wrote:Convection is collapsing NW of the center in a way that makes me think "mid level dry air intrusion". That may be why the global keep Alex weak.


Yea, you may be right. Perhaps the dynamic models will be right in keeping this a tropical storm. Only time will tell.
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re:

#2734 Postby jinftl » Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:04 pm

Agree 100%...love the graphic, but never sure if it is meant to represent flight level winds or the windfield if there was no reduction due to land interaction, friction, etc.

Highest winds reported at Campeche airport today has been 30 mph, even though they are clearly in the ts wind swath in the NHC graphic posted.
http://www.wunderground.com/history/air ... atename=NA





psyclone wrote:those windfield graphics always seem to be waaaay overcooked. according to that pic, a good chunk of land area is experiencing ts conditions. i bet ground truth is far different...obs from merida or progresso or campeche would be telling.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

Re: Re:

#2735 Postby brunota2003 » Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:07 pm

jinftl wrote:Agree 100%...love the graphic, but never sure if it is meant to represent flight level winds or the windfield if there was no reduction due to land interaction, friction, etc.

Highest winds reported at Campeche airport today has been 30 mph, even though they are clearly in the ts wind swath in the NHC graphic posted.
http://www.wunderground.com/history/air ... atename=NA





psyclone wrote:those windfield graphics always seem to be waaaay overcooked. according to that pic, a good chunk of land area is experiencing ts conditions. i bet ground truth is far different...obs from merida or progresso or campeche would be telling.


Could just read the product description :cheesy:

About this product:

This graphic shows the areas potentially being affected by the sustained winds of tropical storm force (in orange) and hurricane force (in red). The display is based on the wind radii contained in the latest Forecast/Advisory (indicated at the top of the figure). Users are reminded that the Forecast/Advisory wind radii represent the maximum possible extent of a given wind speed within particular quadrants around the tropical cyclone. As a result, not all locations falling within the orange or red shaded areas will be experiencing sustained tropical storm or hurricane force winds, respectively.

In addition to the wind field, this graphic shows an approximate representation of coastal areas under a hurricane warning (red), hurricane watch (pink), tropical storm warning (blue) and tropical storm watch (yellow). The white dot indicates the current position of the center of the tropical cyclone, and the dashed line shows the history of the center of the tropical cyclone.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9485
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#2736 Postby ROCK » Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:14 pm

0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: Re:

#2737 Postby jinftl » Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:15 pm

Way to reasonable of a suggestion!!! lol...i plead guilty to not reading the product description. What's next...reminding folks not to focus on the exact track of an individual model run or not forgetting to factor in the standard margin of error that increases as we move out in time for a given forecast track!


:idea: :wink: :idea:



brunota2003 wrote:
jinftl wrote:Agree 100%...love the graphic, but never sure if it is meant to represent flight level winds or the windfield if there was no reduction due to land interaction, friction, etc.

Highest winds reported at Campeche airport today has been 30 mph, even though they are clearly in the ts wind swath in the NHC graphic posted.
http://www.wunderground.com/history/air ... atename=NA





psyclone wrote:those windfield graphics always seem to be waaaay overcooked. according to that pic, a good chunk of land area is experiencing ts conditions. i bet ground truth is far different...obs from merida or progresso or campeche would be telling.


Could just read the product description :cheesy:

About this product:

This graphic shows the areas potentially being affected by the sustained winds of tropical storm force (in orange) and hurricane force (in red). The display is based on the wind radii contained in the latest Forecast/Advisory (indicated at the top of the figure). Users are reminded that the Forecast/Advisory wind radii represent the maximum possible extent of a given wind speed within particular quadrants around the tropical cyclone. As a result, not all locations falling within the orange or red shaded areas will be experiencing sustained tropical storm or hurricane force winds, respectively.

In addition to the wind field, this graphic shows an approximate representation of coastal areas under a hurricane warning (red), hurricane watch (pink), tropical storm warning (blue) and tropical storm watch (yellow). The white dot indicates the current position of the center of the tropical cyclone, and the dashed line shows the history of the center of the tropical cyclone.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#2738 Postby brunota2003 » Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:19 pm

Just because the model is pointed directly at your house does not mean it is 100% guaranteed to hit you! :P
0 likes   

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4769
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

#2739 Postby psyclone » Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:21 pm

I've read the product description before and IMO they're overdone to the point of being useless but i admit this could be a defect on my part:)
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#2740 Postby Sanibel » Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:41 pm

The front isn't plunging as much as it looked earlier. You have to be careful calling for turns too early.
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests