ATL: Ex Tropical Storm EARL - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#3021 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:35 pm

plasticup wrote:
AJF0602 wrote:there's one model that has shifted and puts North Carolina in line for a direct hit.
http://i.imwx.com/images/sat/regions/spec_sat10_600_en.jpg

But it's definitely an outlier. What model is that? NOGAPS?


It's the GFNI. It's the interprolated model from the GFDN...which is the NOGAPS version of the GFDL.
0 likes   

User avatar
artist
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9792
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: West Palm

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#3022 Postby artist » Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:35 pm

TropicalWXMA wrote:
AJF0602 wrote:there's one model that has shifted and puts North Carolina in line for a direct hit.
Image


Oh God..... TWC. :x


People are forgetting that Knabb from the National Hurricane Center joined TWC this year. :wink:
0 likes   

cpdaman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:44 am
Location: SPB county (gulf stream)

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#3023 Postby cpdaman » Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:35 pm

for SNE model consensus takes this right over the Bench mark (i.e 40N/ 70W)....which is a good distance off shore...unless u live on nantucket
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#3024 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:36 pm

TropicalWXMA wrote:

Oh God..... TWC. :x


No need to get mad at TWC...the GFDI is a model that is plotted on numerous sites.

http://euler.atmos.colostate.edu/~vigh/guidance/northatlantic/track_early1.png
0 likes   

User avatar
artist
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9792
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: West Palm

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#3025 Postby artist » Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:36 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
plasticup wrote:
AJF0602 wrote:there's one model that has shifted and puts North Carolina in line for a direct hit.
http://i.imwx.com/images/sat/regions/spec_sat10_600_en.jpg

But it's definitely an outlier. What model is that? NOGAPS?


It's the GFNI. It's the interprolated model from the GFDN...which is the NOGAPS version of the GFDL.

does that mean it has the same reliability as the NOGAPS? :D
0 likes   

SunnyThoughts
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2263
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Pensacola, Florida

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#3026 Postby SunnyThoughts » Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:39 pm

Latest

Image
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#3027 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:39 pm

artist wrote: does that mean it has the same reliability as the NOGAPS? :D


Yes...kinda...
0 likes   

User avatar
webke
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 290
Age: 70
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 12:39 pm
Location: North Myrtle Beach SC

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#3028 Postby webke » Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:42 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
artist wrote: does that mean it has the same reliability as the NOGAPS? :D


Yes...kinda...


What do you mean by kinda?
0 likes   

ncweatherwizard
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1243
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 9:45 am
Location: Ft. Collins, CO

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#3029 Postby ncweatherwizard » Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:44 pm

Hurritrax wrote:Mandatory evacuation for all residents and visitors on Ocracoke Island on the Outer Banks has been ordered and will commence tommorrow morning at 5:00 AM...it may take 14-20 hours to get everyone off the island by ferry. Expecting major overwash on Highway 12 from Kitty Hawk through Hatteras Island, with the worse occurring Thursday night through Friday morning. High tide occurs at 2:30 AM Friday. No evacuations ordered yet for Hatteras Island north to Duck, and in my opinion, unless something drastic happens with the forecast track, there probably will not be any mandatory orders for this area.


Good call since it's impossible to access Ocracoke once any storm gets close. Overall, I'm pleased with the 5PM NHC Watches/Warnings. No metropolis areas yet included, yet plenty of room given for a westward shift in track or expansion of the 64kt wind field. Plenty of time to adjust.
0 likes   

shah8
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:36 pm

#3030 Postby shah8 » Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:44 pm

Yeah, that really was the worst kind of geeky equivocation in a non-geek forum, wasn't it?
0 likes   

User avatar
Tstormwatcher
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3086
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: New Bern, NC

Re:

#3031 Postby Tstormwatcher » Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:44 pm

UpTheCreek wrote:We're now under a hurricane watch, but I doubt my town will get anything more that light tropical storm winds, if that. However, being on the water, surge could be a major issue.


Just learned this myself. I think it all depends on how close to the coast earl gets as to what we will get. Higher water will happen no matter how close it gets.
0 likes   

SCHawkFan
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Myrtle Beach

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#3032 Postby SCHawkFan » Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:46 pm

SCHawkFan wrote:Joe Bastardi joining Sean Hannity on the radio in one minute.


What he said - 50-100 miles off OBX and Cape Cod. If the track changes, it will move a little west. He does not think it will significantly impact all of the east coast north of OBX. Maybe some good wind over the eastern end of Long Island. His forecast is inline with the NHC, et al.
0 likes   

User avatar
UpTheCreek
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 397
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:28 pm
Location: Vassalboro, Maine

Re: Re:

#3033 Postby UpTheCreek » Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:47 pm

I-wall wrote:I think the main difference between a watch and a warning is the time frame in which the hurricane conditions will occur. I'd say it's likely that your hurricane watch will be converted to a warning within the next day or two provided that there isnt a significant track shift to the east. Glad you're prepared and watching this, hopefully it doesnt get too bad for you. In any case, we will look forward to you posting observations from the area :D Stay safe!



I had to go review those definitions again, it's been so long since we've had a decent storm here....a la Isabel. After further review, you are absolutely KIND of correct! :)

A watch is "possible" and within 48 hours. A warning is "expected" and within 36 hours. But it makes no nevermind, I know what you mean.

Hurricane Warning:
An announcement that hurricane conditions (sustained winds of 74 mph or higher) are expected somewhere within the specified coastal area. Because hurricane preparedness activities become difficult once winds reach tropical storm force, the hurricane warning is issued 36 hours in advance of the anticipated onset of tropical-storm-force winds.


Hurricane Watch:
An announcement that hurricane conditions (sustained winds of 74 mph or higher) are possible within the specified coastal area. Because hurricane preparedness activities become difficult once winds reach tropical storm force, the hurricane watch is issued 48 hours in advance of the anticipated onset of tropical-storm-force winds.



Thanks for the well wishes, much appreciated. I'll keep posting observations as long as we have a connection!
0 likes   

User avatar
UpTheCreek
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 397
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:28 pm
Location: Vassalboro, Maine

Re: Re:

#3034 Postby UpTheCreek » Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:50 pm

Tstormwatcher wrote:
UpTheCreek wrote:We're now under a hurricane watch, but I doubt my town will get anything more that light tropical storm winds, if that. However, being on the water, surge could be a major issue.


Just learned this myself. I think it all depends on how close to the coast earl gets as to what we will get. Higher water will happen no matter how close it gets.


I agree. While I am being vigilant, I think our chances of something very strong are fairly low. Anything can happen and preparing for the worst case scenario!
0 likes   

User avatar
UpTheCreek
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 397
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:28 pm
Location: Vassalboro, Maine

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#3035 Postby UpTheCreek » Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:51 pm

SCHawkFan wrote:
SCHawkFan wrote:Joe Bastardi joining Sean Hannity on the radio in one minute.


What he said - 50-100 miles off OBX and Cape Cod. If the track changes, it will move a little west. He does not think it will significantly impact all of the east coast north of OBX. Maybe some good wind over the eastern end of Long Island. His forecast is inline with the NHC, et al.



Hope Joe is right and I'm sorry for anything I ever said about him in the past! If we get hammered, all bets are off! :grr:
0 likes   

User avatar
dixiebreeze
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5140
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
Location: crystal river, fla.

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#3036 Postby dixiebreeze » Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:57 pm

Looks like Earl's western boundaries are improving quite a lot.
0 likes   

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4234
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#3037 Postby abajan » Tue Aug 31, 2010 5:00 pm

LowndesCoFire wrote:
dixiebreeze wrote:Anyone recall if Earl even remotely resembles Hugo?

Image

I guess not! :lol:
That picture certainly spoke 1000 words. Hugo was a monster.
0 likes   

User avatar
thetruesms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 844
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Tallahasee, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#3038 Postby thetruesms » Tue Aug 31, 2010 5:06 pm

webke wrote:
Air Force Met wrote:
artist wrote: does that mean it has the same reliability as the NOGAPS? :D


Yes...kinda...


What do you mean by kinda?
NOGAPS provides the initial conditions for the model, and since the GFDL is a regional model, it also needs a global to supply it boundary conditions, which the GFDN would also get from NOGAPS. So, while the initial data and the general hemispheric flow come from NOGAPS with the same reliability, everything that happens within the model's domain comes from the regional model's physics.
0 likes   

User avatar
CronkPSU
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2014
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:44 pm
Location: Avalon Park, FL

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#3039 Postby CronkPSU » Tue Aug 31, 2010 5:15 pm

abajan wrote:
LowndesCoFire wrote:
dixiebreeze wrote:Anyone recall if Earl even remotely resembles Hugo?


I guess not! :lol:
That picture certainly spoke 1000 words. Hugo was a monster.


wait and see what Earl look like in about 24 hours when he is done with his EWRC and around the same spot...maybe more like 20 words
0 likes   

User avatar
webke
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 290
Age: 70
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 12:39 pm
Location: North Myrtle Beach SC

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#3040 Postby webke » Tue Aug 31, 2010 5:16 pm

NOGAPS provides the initial conditions for the model, and since the GFDL is a regional model, it also needs a global to supply it boundary conditions, which the GFDN would also get from NOGAPS. So, while the initial data and the general hemispheric flow come from NOGAPS with the same reliability, everything that happens within the model's domain comes from the regional model's physics.
[/quote]

So if I understand you correctly if the data from the NOGAPS is incorrect the output of the GFDN will be also. The interesting thing is that the model run for the NOGAPS was in line with the GFS>
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests