ATL: DON - Remnant - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: Re:

#1061 Postby KWT » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:02 am

cycloneye wrote:
SouthDadeFish wrote:90L may be on a collision course with the Yucatan. That may slow down development.


Yucatan is flat on the northern side,is not like Hispanola.


not only that but the coast will probably help to get the western side of any LLC going due to the frictional effects of land.

May actually help to finally get every going combined with the wicked heat content...just depends on whether the shear stays low or not.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

#1062 Postby SouthDadeFish » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:11 am

Yesterday:

Image

Today:

Image
Mind you that's not even a 24 hour interval. Much better organized.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#1063 Postby KWT » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:15 am

SDF, sure does look like a developing TD it has to be said, however I've seen many a MLC have similar presentations only for recon to find nothing at all at the surface...Dolly 2008 was a prime example of that actually!

I'm not sure what's going on in the lower levels, shame we don't have recon today.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9483
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1064 Postby ROCK » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:16 am

petit_bois wrote:all of the bouys in the area suggest there really isn't much going on at the surface.
5-10 knot winds from the south reporting from bouys east, west and south of the area.



there is only one buoy and 90L passed it last night...not sure where you are seeing additional buoys out in that area...
0 likes   

User avatar
TropicalAnalystwx13
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2109
Age: 27
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:20 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

Re:

#1065 Postby TropicalAnalystwx13 » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:16 am

SouthDadeFish wrote:I don't want to stir the pot or anything, but what's stopping possible Don from exploding in the Gulf if he develops in the next 24-36 hours? Shear is forecast to be very low, and the waters are crazy warm... What am I missing?


There is an upper trough draped across the Gulf of Mexico, creating relatively unfavorable upper level conditions. Not to mention, the death ridge is also creating unfavorable easterly shear. However, 90L may be able to "throw" enough heat to the upper trough to cause it to split, which takes care of it. This could allow for slightly more favorable upper level conditions, but the winds aren't going to be perfect.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9483
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1066 Postby ROCK » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:18 am

Ivanhater wrote:Show me a Global model that showed this looking as good as it does now. None....This is obviously developing this morning and if it continues that makes 3 out of the 4 storms this season the globals didn't see....A bit concerning :D

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/gmex/vis-l.jpg



Ivan, I think what happened (discounting the jacked up GFS) is that the other globals couldnt latch on due to all the land interaction. With no LLC before DR they had no idea what to do with it.....just my theory of course...
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: Re:

#1067 Postby SouthDadeFish » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:18 am

TropicalAnalystwx13 wrote:
SouthDadeFish wrote:I don't want to stir the pot or anything, but what's stopping possible Don from exploding in the Gulf if he develops in the next 24-36 hours? Shear is forecast to be very low, and the waters are crazy warm... What am I missing?


There is an upper trough draped across the Gulf of Mexico, creating relatively unfavorable upper level conditions. Not to mention, the death ridge is also creating unfavorable easterly shear. However, 90L may be able to "throw" enough heat to the upper trough to cause it to split, which takes care of it. This could allow for slightly more favorable upper level conditions, but the winds aren't going to be perfect.


Thanks, I was going mainly by the SHIPS shear forecast with that statement. The GFS and NAM seem to present much different upper-level conditions.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9483
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: Re:

#1068 Postby ROCK » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:19 am

TropicalAnalystwx13 wrote:
SouthDadeFish wrote:I don't want to stir the pot or anything, but what's stopping possible Don from exploding in the Gulf if he develops in the next 24-36 hours? Shear is forecast to be very low, and the waters are crazy warm... What am I missing?


There is an upper trough draped across the Gulf of Mexico, creating relatively unfavorable upper level conditions. Not to mention, the death ridge is also creating unfavorable easterly shear. However, 90L may be able to "throw" enough heat to the upper trough to cause it to split, which takes care of it. This could allow for slightly more favorable upper level conditions, but the winds aren't going to be perfect.



The SHIPS would have taken this into account but still shows favorable conditions....we shall see...
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143867
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1069 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:21 am

ROCK,and that land interaction was the cause of why the tropical models were not runned for 48 hours.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
drezee
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3664
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 12:49 pm
Location: FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1070 Postby drezee » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:21 am

I know at least a couple of people visit this board from the NHC...we need a resources permitting flight today...please...there are a lot of taxpayers on this board...
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11153
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1071 Postby Ivanhater » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:22 am

I still do not think there is anything at the surface....yet. That should change later today if it continues to organize.
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re:

#1072 Postby SouthDadeFish » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:22 am

KWT wrote:SDF, sure does look like a developing TD it has to be said, however I've seen many a MLC have similar presentations only for recon to find nothing at all at the surface...Dolly 2008 was a prime example of that actually!

I'm not sure what's going on in the lower levels, shame we don't have recon today.


I completely agree. Dolly and 90L are relatively the same location when Dolly became classified. Dolly was 18.4N 84.2W.
0 likes   

Nederlander
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1248
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:28 pm
Location: Conroe, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models

#1073 Postby Nederlander » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:25 am

Tireman4 wrote:
Nederlander wrote:Actually mikey we are fine here in SETX in regards to the drought. Our KBDI numbers are the best in the state. We've gotten good rain lately. I would rather see south central TX get this system..


For you maybe, but not us. Houston-Galveston is still WAY WAY behind in drought numbers.

http://www.srh.noaa.gov/hgx/?n=drought

And looking at these numbers, you are not doing that well either.

Edit: under KBDI, yes, but under the Drought Index, no.


His location said Beaumont, so when I said SETX, i was referring to mostly Jefferson/Orange counties. Sorry for not being specific, next time I will include lat/lon coordinates. Also, yes of course we are still way under normal rainfall totals, and I know the Houston area is too, but I dont really think you understand how bad the conditions are out in West, Central, and Southern Texas. They need it way worse than we do. (we being Jefferson county).. geez when did everyone become so persnickety on here.. ok back to model talk..
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9483
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1074 Postby ROCK » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:25 am

Ivanhater wrote:I still do not think there is anything at the surface....yet. That should change later today if it continues to organize.


yeah we will know it once 90L hits the surface...be like a bomb going off..
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#1075 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:25 am

Very little at the surface.. but some weak rotation around 85 west.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
drezee
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3664
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 12:49 pm
Location: FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1076 Postby drezee » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:26 am

Ivanhater wrote:I still do not think there is anything at the surface....yet. That should change later today if it continues to organize.


Looking at the high res visibles...I think there are two competing areas of low pressure (not LLCs yet) one near 22/82 and one near 20/83. Once one takes over, it will pop. Sort of like Erin from 1995, two areas of low pressure.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#1077 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:27 am

But I would imagine we get a more defined LLC develop associated with the deep convection near the isle of youth later today.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Outlaw JW
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 10:35 am
Location: Del Rio TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models

#1078 Postby Outlaw JW » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:27 am

Nederlander wrote:
Tireman4 wrote:
Nederlander wrote:Actually mikey we are fine here in SETX in regards to the drought. Our KBDI numbers are the best in the state. We've gotten good rain lately. I would rather see south central TX get this system..


For you maybe, but not us. Houston-Galveston is still WAY WAY behind in drought numbers.

http://www.srh.noaa.gov/hgx/?n=drought

And looking at these numbers, you are not doing that well either.

Edit: under KBDI, yes, but under the Drought Index, no.


His location said Beaumont, so when I said SETX, i was referring to mostly Jefferson/Orange counties. Sorry for not being specific, next time I will include lat/lon coordinates. Also, yes of course we are still way under normal rainfall totals, and I know the Houston area is too, but I dont really think you understand how bad the conditions are out in West, Central, and Southern Texas. They need it way worse than we do. (we being Jefferson county).. geez when did everyone become so persnickety on here.. ok back to model talk..


We've had about two inches of rain since the end of last August with a 1/2 inch coming in last Friday. Cedar or Juniper trees are dying. We need the rain as a drought buster.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143867
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1079 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:29 am

wxman57, what are you thoughts today on 90L?
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

bbadon
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 190
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 7:21 am
Location: Johnson Bayou, LA
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1080 Postby bbadon » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:30 am

It looks to me an LLC is forming just at west edge of the convection associated with the MLC. Also It looks to me the MLC is trying to allign with the developing LLC. Anyone else see this?
0 likes   


Return to “2011”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 84 guests