ATL: DON - Remnant - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models
0z GFDL coming out soon....oh the suspense...
0z CMC doesnt see squat.....
0z CMC doesnt see squat.....

0 likes
- Texashawk
- Category 2
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:50 am
- Location: Missouri City, TX (Houston)
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion
ROCK wrote:Texashawk wrote:dwsqos2 wrote:I'm sorry, but I think this is still a mess. It was interesting this morning when I saw decent inflow, but now blah. Most of the did eventually develop a very sharp surface trough or weak surface low, so they haven't been that bad. I am going to play devil's advocate and say rather blindly that, based on the globals, no classification as a tropical cyclone will ever occur.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Are we even talking about the same system? I'm not trying to be rude, but... there's a pronounced spin, the cloud tops are firing very cold and the beginnings of a CDO is starting to form. Plus, the convection is expanding and the winds are closing off. If this is a mess, then I'd hate to see a real storm!
bro, hes been doing this same show since I became a member back in 04.....just let it go....
Thanks Rock... not that I was doubting my own limited, amateur forecasting skills, but... no, I wasn't.

0 likes
- TwisterFanatic
- Category 5
- Posts: 1041
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:43 pm
- Location: Sallisaw, Oklahoma
Won't be shocked whatsoever if RECON finds a TD tomorrow, maybe even Don.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- Texashawk
- Category 2
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:50 am
- Location: Missouri City, TX (Houston)
Re:
TwisterFanatic wrote:Won't be shocked whatsoever if RECON finds a TD tomorrow, maybe even Don.
Me, neither. It's really come together since about 9 PM. Solid core and good spin now. And since it's fairly small, it should pull itself together quickly.
0 likes
- TwisterFanatic
- Category 5
- Posts: 1041
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:43 pm
- Location: Sallisaw, Oklahoma
Re:
CrazyC83 wrote:TD4 at 5 am? Or will they wait for a visible?
If it's clear, and they got evidence from the buoys, yes, if not they'll wait for RECON.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion
they might call it TD5....better now than later I think since its bound for a GOM landfall somewhere. MY bet is recon will name this once they get in there tomorrow.
IMO, this might more formidable than some think....Models never handle intensity well....
IMO, this might more formidable than some think....Models never handle intensity well....
0 likes
- HurricaneBrain
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:07 pm
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion
dwsqos2 wrote:I'm sorry, but I think this is still a mess. It was interesting this morning when I saw decent inflow, but now blah. Most of the did eventually develop a very sharp surface trough or weak surface low, so they haven't been that bad. I am going to play devil's advocate and say rather blindly that, based on the globals, no classification as a tropical cyclone will ever occur.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
And this is why Storm2k has a disclaimer.

Last edited by HurricaneBrain on Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- TwisterFanatic
- Category 5
- Posts: 1041
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:43 pm
- Location: Sallisaw, Oklahoma
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion
ROCK wrote:they might call it TD5....better now than later I think since its bound for a GOM landfall somewhere. MY bet is recon will name this once they get in there tomorrow.
IMO, this might more formidable than some think....Models never handle intensity well....
That's a good point, didn't think about the GOM threat.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models
0z GFDL.....right up the Houston Ship channel ala IKE.....at 66knts....also a Cat 1
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfdltc2. ... =Animation
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfdltc2. ... =Animation
Last edited by ROCK on Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models
0 likes
- Texashawk
- Category 2
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:50 am
- Location: Missouri City, TX (Houston)
Re:
BigB0882 wrote:GFDL seems to strengthen it rather quickly, from 35kts to 63kts in just 6 hours. Not sure if that will pan out but we don't want a rapidly strengthening storm moving in, it could surprise a lot of people.
Indeed. Even the notoriously hyperbolic Houston weather media has been giving this one a slow yawn for the last day or so.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion
All you GOMERS need to check out the 0z GFDL and HWRF runs...in the model thread...
0 likes
- TwisterFanatic
- Category 5
- Posts: 1041
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:43 pm
- Location: Sallisaw, Oklahoma
HWRF doesn't seem to unreasonable strength wise.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- South Texas Storms
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4229
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models
Tonight's 0z Euro shows stronger vorticity making landfall near South Padre in 72 hours.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models
The GFDL does not look right.. The "storm" would already have to be moving NW for it to verify. Maybe a bit of -removed- but if that verified.. parts of Texas who need rain the most would get nada.. zilch
Last edited by hriverajr on Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models
that is a pretty scary scenario given some of things we have seen over the last few years....Rita ,Katrina and even Humberto.....bombing out like they did....The GOM is incredibly toasty right now...
http://wxmaps.org/pix/hurpot.html#ATL
http://wxmaps.org/pix/hurpot.html#ATL
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests