ATL: EMILY - Remnants
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- Bocadude85
- Category 5
- Posts: 2991
- Age: 38
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
- Location: Honolulu,Hi
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
Seems like this could be a close call for the SE US next week. Still think David in 1979 is a good analog for a potential track.
0 likes
- Evil Jeremy
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5463
- Age: 32
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion
sunnyday wrote:So. Fla. newspaper says today that the storm will take a strong east turn into the Bahamas, thus missing Florida. That's not very responsible to be so certain at this point, is it?
No, but props to them for discussing the system this far out. At least people may know that a system could be coming close to us.
0 likes
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17
- vacanechaser
- Category 5
- Posts: 1461
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 9:34 pm
- Location: Portsmouth, Va
- Contact:
Explodes into a strong system on the ECM at 192hrs, recurving ENE out to sea, very close to Bermuda!
models have been shifting westwards overall today, at least for the first 96hrs, thats something that will need to be watched.
models have been shifting westwards overall today, at least for the first 96hrs, thats something that will need to be watched.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
I've been trying to get a center fix. Looks like about 13.7 N at 53 W. Last center fix I had was 12.6 N at 48 W. A little more than a degree of latitude north for 5 every degrees west. Some of that could have been the system lifting out of the ITC.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
The HWRF that cycloneye posted (http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/hwrftc2.cgi?time=2011073112-invest91l&field=Sea+Level+Pressure&hour=Animation) has it at 25N 74W heading northward having reached 75-85 knots (bouncing around some), but not sure there's enough weakness north of it to keep it headed that way, although the ridge in the Atlantic isn't blocking it either. Anybody else see anything?
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion
scotto wrote:It looks like the one to the west is slowing down and the easterly one is going to run in to it.
Thats a possible solution, the surface low of the western one would likely become dominant and the two will merge together.
Thats at least what the ECm/Nogaps have both been showing on thier 12z.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
- x-y-no
- Category 5
- Posts: 8359
- Age: 65
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Well this throws a spanner in the works:
Source: http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/tdpositions.html
OB 16 of recon (last set I've seen) had NW winds in what should have been the NW quad of the old (trailing) circulation. But that makes sense if the leading blob has taken over.
If that's the case - throw all the models out.
31/1745 UTC 13.1N 56.8W T1.5/1.5 91L -- Atlantic
Source: http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/tdpositions.html
OB 16 of recon (last set I've seen) had NW winds in what should have been the NW quad of the old (trailing) circulation. But that makes sense if the leading blob has taken over.
If that's the case - throw all the models out.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion
look where they placed the center
31/1745 UTC 13.1N 56.8W T1.5/1.5 91L
31/1745 UTC 13.1N 56.8W T1.5/1.5 91L
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion
They've been discussing it for a couple of days now. Readers are writing in, making fun of it all and saying to head to the store and buy up all the bread! They say they don't care if it doesn't come where they live! 

0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
Nimbus wrote:I've been trying to get a center fix. Looks like about 13.7 N at 53 W. Last center fix I had was 12.6 N at 48 W. A little more than a degree of latitude north for 5 every degrees west. Some of that could have been the system lifting out of the ITC.
Good luck trying to get a center fix, its pretty messy out there and there are two regions that seems to be competing and disruping each other at the moment.
Thats why I'd put rather small amount of trust in the models for now.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
Recurve wrote:The HWRF that cycloneye posted (http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/hwrftc2.cgi?time=2011073112-invest91l&field=Sea+Level+Pressure&hour=Animation) has it at 25N 74W heading northward having reached 75-85 knots (bouncing around some), but not sure there's enough weakness north of it to keep it headed that way, although the ridge in the Atlantic isn't blocking it either. Anybody else see anything?
yeah posted that earlier..
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion
XYNO, why would they throw all the models out? How would the direction change then?
0 likes
- Hurricaneman
- Category 5
- Posts: 7351
- Age: 45
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
- Location: central florida
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion
EyELeSs1 wrote:look where they placed the center
31/1745 UTC 13.1N 56.8W T1.5/1.5 91L
if that true, throw all the model runs in the trash bin because they would be wrong
0 likes
Re: Re:
beoumont wrote:Dean4Storms wrote:The western area should fade away as the the low near 14N 52W continues to organize and deepen. That is where Recon. will be investigating and likely to find our TC!
Another double-yolk elongated disturbance to deal with. Hopefully the yoke is not on us.
Best hurricane pun of the YEAR!

0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion
EyELeSs1 wrote:Lowpressure wrote:Recon windfield data will be very interesting.
100% agree
Can you post the web site for this PIC. thanks in advance.
0 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion
Hurricaneman wrote:EyELeSs1 wrote:look where they placed the center
31/1745 UTC 13.1N 56.8W T1.5/1.5 91L
if that true, throw all the model runs in the trash bin because they would be wrong
well that is just the mean center of the two areas... just splitting the difference.
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
- Dave
- Retired Staff
- Posts: 13442
- Age: 74
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:57 pm
- Location: Milan Indiana
- Contact:
31/1745 UTC 13.1N 56.8W T1.5/1.5 91L -- Atlantic
Source: http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/tdpositions.html
Still no updates from AF304 on HDOBS..
Someone else take over please, I have to leave soon. Good luck & thanks!
Source: http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/tdpositions.html
Still no updates from AF304 on HDOBS..
Someone else take over please, I have to leave soon. Good luck & thanks!
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote:Hurricaneman wrote:EyELeSs1 wrote:look where they placed the center
31/1745 UTC 13.1N 56.8W T1.5/1.5 91L
if that true, throw all the model runs in the trash bin because they would be wrong
well that is just the mean center of the two areas... just splitting the difference.
So there's not two entities? This is just one big mess?? Wow.. will be awhile before this will consolidate into some sort of organization.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote:Hurricaneman wrote:EyELeSs1 wrote:look where they placed the center
31/1745 UTC 13.1N 56.8W T1.5/1.5 91L
if that true, throw all the model runs in the trash bin because they would be wrong
well that is just the mean center of the two areas... just splitting the difference.
So there's not two entities? This is just one big mess?? Wow.. will be awhile before this will consolidate into some sort of organization.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests