ATL: KATIA - Post Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
meriland23
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1239
Age: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:29 pm

#1821 Postby meriland23 » Thu Sep 01, 2011 11:34 pm

h177
Image
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: KATIA - Models

#1822 Postby SouthFLTropics » Thu Sep 01, 2011 11:36 pm

abajan wrote:
SouthFLTropics wrote:At 120 hours starts moving west at around 26 north...High pressure sitting overhead of her...

I've seen this movie before somewhere!!!

SFT
It's kinda reminding me of Andrew in '92.


Tsk Tsk...Don't say the "A" word in here!!! :double: I start to get twitches and have flashbacks!!!

SFT
0 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: KATIA - Models

#1823 Postby SouthFloridawx » Thu Sep 01, 2011 11:37 pm

Hey meriland, check your pm's.
0 likes   

User avatar
meriland23
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1239
Age: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:29 pm

#1824 Postby meriland23 » Thu Sep 01, 2011 11:37 pm

h186
Image
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
meriland23
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1239
Age: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:29 pm

#1825 Postby meriland23 » Thu Sep 01, 2011 11:38 pm

h204
Image
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
meriland23
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1239
Age: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:29 pm

#1826 Postby meriland23 » Thu Sep 01, 2011 11:40 pm

h216 then she heads on out
Image
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4233
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

Re: ATL: KATIA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1827 Postby abajan » Thu Sep 01, 2011 11:40 pm

stewart715 wrote:
meriland23 wrote:
T'Bonz wrote:Our local met (Miami) said this will NOT hit Florida.

He had better be right!

Did he say probably not? Or a definitive NO. Cause if he made such a bold statement and that does not follow through. There are going to be a lot of angry people and a lot of people staying behind because they took his word to heart. Making absolute certain claims this far out is nothing short of rediculous. Do most models project florida? No, but the chances of her recurving later and heading into the EC is becoming more and more or a reality as time passes. I think his statement was kind of irresponsible.


+1
You should've heard our weather presenter (not a meteorologist - just a presenter of the weather news) in 2004 emphatically stating that Ivan will pass (not would likely pass but will pass) well to the north of Barbados. Its eye eventually passed fairly far to our south (thankfully, because a number of roofs were blown off).
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: KATIA - Models

#1828 Postby SouthFLTropics » Thu Sep 01, 2011 11:43 pm

This is a close call for the Outer Banks. If we see a further trend west in the next two runs or so I think the chances of a CONUS strike will go up dramatically. I'm still not sold on the slow movement of her between say hours 110 to 160. We are out past 5 days at this point in this model and I'm somewhat concerned for the CONUS. The trend has been west but we are not being hit 5 days out on the model. Personally I prefer to have the storm hitting me at 5 days out...because I know it will change. GFS had a target on my house for quite a while with Irene when she was 5+ days out...I felt pretty good because I knew it would change. When I'm not the target at that range but it's in my region I get concerned.

SFT
0 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

bamajammer4eva
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 907
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 3:21 am
Location: Ozark, AL

Re: ATL: KATIA - Models

#1829 Postby bamajammer4eva » Thu Sep 01, 2011 11:46 pm

That's comical, for a day or two there it looks like Lee and Katia form some sort of double barrel tropical cyclone. :double:
0 likes   

supercane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2858
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:27 pm

Re:

#1830 Postby supercane » Thu Sep 01, 2011 11:51 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:haha really ... 16.7 n.. thats funny. its barely at 16n

What makes you think that? While ultimately morning vis would be helpful, data supporting the NHC's current location include:
Latest microwave imagery (poor resolution with AMSUB, but shows center north of 16N):
Image
Latest ASCAT image:
Image
Continuity from Dvorak fixes from 00Z, which were already north of 16N with an apparent WNW motion on IR satellite:
AL, 12, 201109012345, 10, DVTS, CI, , 1630N, 4980W, , 2, 55, 2, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , L, SAB, EG, IM, 3, 3535 /////, , , GOES13, LLCC, T, DT=3.5 BO CBND MET=4.0 PT=3.5 FTBO DT
AL, 12, 201109012345, 10, DVTS, CI, , 1640N, 4980W, , 3, 65, 2, 987, 2, DVRK, , , , , , , , , , , , , , L, TAFB, GR, I, 5, 3540 /////, , , GOES13, CSC, T,

So I ask again, what evidence do you have that makes the current position so laughable?

edited by tolakram
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

Re: Re:

#1831 Postby fci » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:01 am

supercane wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:haha really ... 16.7 n.. thats funny. its barely at 16n

What makes you think that? While ultimately morning vis would be helpful, data supporting the NHC's current location include:
Latest microwave imagery (poor resolution with AMSUB, but shows center north of 16N):
http://img585.imageshack.us/img585/6252 ... ax891d.jpg
Latest ASCAT image:
http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/3336 ... katiaa.png
Continuity from Dvorak fixes from 00Z, which were already north of 16N with an apparent WNW motion on IR satellite:
AL, 12, 201109012345, 10, DVTS, CI, , 1630N, 4980W, , 2, 55, 2, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , L, SAB, EG, IM, 3, 3535 /////, , , GOES13, LLCC, T, DT=3.5 BO CBND MET=4.0 PT=3.5 FTBO DT
AL, 12, 201109012345, 10, DVTS, CI, , 1640N, 4980W, , 3, 65, 2, 987, 2, DVRK, , , , , , , , , , , , , , L, TAFB, GR, I, 5, 3540 /////, , , GOES13, CSC, T,

So I ask again, what evidence do you have that makes the current position so laughable?


I think Aric signed off about 30 minutes ago.

From the models forum at 12:08 AM
well good night.. dont need to see anymore models since I know what they will say even if katia turns SW lol


So, he can't defend himself to you and comment on the points that you bring up.
You might prefer to send him a PM rather than flaming him on the board
Just my opinion........................

edited by tolakram: removed images!
0 likes   

theweatherwatch

Re: Re:

#1832 Postby theweatherwatch » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:05 am

fci wrote:
supercane wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:haha really ... 16.7 n.. thats funny. its barely at 16n

What makes you think that? While ultimately morning vis would be helpful, data supporting the NHC's current location include:
Latest microwave imagery (poor resolution with AMSUB, but shows center north of 16N):
http://img585.imageshack.us/img585/6252 ... ax891d.jpg
Latest ASCAT image:
http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/3336 ... katiaa.png
Continuity from Dvorak fixes from 00Z, which were already north of 16N with an apparent WNW motion on IR satellite:
AL, 12, 201109012345, 10, DVTS, CI, , 1630N, 4980W, , 2, 55, 2, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , L, SAB, EG, IM, 3, 3535 /////, , , GOES13, LLCC, T, DT=3.5 BO CBND MET=4.0 PT=3.5 FTBO DT
AL, 12, 201109012345, 10, DVTS, CI, , 1640N, 4980W, , 3, 65, 2, 987, 2, DVRK, , , , , , , , , , , , , , L, TAFB, GR, I, 5, 3540 /////, , , GOES13, CSC, T,

So I ask again, what evidence do you have that makes the current position so laughable?


I think Aric signed off about 30 minutes ago.

From the models forum at 12:08 AM
well good night.. dont need to see anymore models since I know what they will say even if katia turns SW lol


So, he can't defend himself to you and comment on the points that you bring up.
You might prefer to send him a PM rather than flaming him on the board
Just my opinion........................


Also he said it was Barely at 16 north which means according to him it is at 16 north or just north of there BUT NOT way up at almost 17 north (16.7).

edited by tolakram: removed images
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: KATIA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1833 Postby SouthFloridawx » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:10 am

Yeah the ascat does show barely 16...
0 likes   

User avatar
Cranica
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 69
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2011 3:31 pm

Re: Re:

#1834 Postby Cranica » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:10 am

fci wrote:So, he can't defend himself to you and comment on the points that you bring up.
You might prefer to send him a PM rather than flaming him on the board
Just my opinion........................


Stating reasons why he's wrong is hardly "flaming".

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/flash-avn.html

Very impressive convective blowup over/near the center, but looking at the microwave she's still got a long way to go before assembling a core.
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

Re: Re:

#1835 Postby fci » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:29 am

Cranica wrote:
fci wrote:So, he can't defend himself to you and comment on the points that you bring up.
You might prefer to send him a PM rather than flaming him on the board
Just my opinion........................


Stating reasons why he's wrong is hardly "flaming".

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/flash-avn.html

Very impressive convective blowup over/near the center, but looking at the microwave she's still got a long way to go before assembling a core.


I agree that stating reasons that the author thinks he is incorrect is fine.
This quote is what I was referring to, that I thought was "flaming" and better suited for a PM:

What makes you think that? IMO you shouldn't be so cavalier about things and write lol about everything you disagree with off, especially given your rise to moderator.
0 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: KATIA - Models

#1836 Postby SFLcane » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:32 am

00z CMC & Navy Nogaps both recurve.
0 likes   

supercane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2858
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:27 pm

#1837 Postby supercane » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:33 am

Operational GFS comparisons over the last 4 cycles; very similar to 18Z but as with 18Z farther west than the earlier runs:
Image
0 likes   

bexar
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 182
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 11:23 am

#1838 Postby bexar » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:38 am

Katia is literally circular via latest satellite presentation :double:
0 likes   

User avatar
meriland23
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1239
Age: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: ATL: KATIA - Models

#1839 Postby meriland23 » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:38 am

SFLcane wrote:00z CMC & Navy Nogaps both recurve.


I am looking at both right now, it says at the bottom it is 00z 01/09/ and not 02/09. I might have a lagging model or something.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: KATIA - Models

#1840 Postby SouthFloridawx » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:41 am

meriland23 wrote:
SFLcane wrote:00z CMC & Navy Nogaps both recurve.


I am looking at both right now, it says at the bottom it is 00z 01/09/ and not 02/09. I might have a lagging model or something.



Go to North Atlantic:

https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/wxmap_cgi/index.html
Last edited by SouthFloridawx on Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:54 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   


Return to “2011”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests