ATL: DEBBY - Post-Tropical

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

#1141 Postby northjaxpro » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:13 am

Yeah, conditions currently are only marginally conducive at best with the shear still going on across the Northern GOM. Now, we have another ULL in the NW GOM which formed seemingly out of nowhere during the past 6-12 hours.
Last edited by northjaxpro on Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#1142 Postby HouTXmetro » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:14 am

Looks NE to me as well of where it was pronged to be.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

CYCLONE MIKE
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2183
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: Gonzales, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#1143 Postby CYCLONE MIKE » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:17 am

NDG wrote:
CYCLONE MIKE wrote:If shear would let up this would have a chance.Like NHC said the center is becoming much better defined as apparent on visible this morning.Just cant get anything to wrap north and west yet. Surprised they didn't mention anything about the shear. Is it supposed to calm down any today?


The ECMWF did a nice job a few days ago of forecasting the ULL in the NW GOM to create the SW shear across the northern gulf.
Now the same model is forecasting it to slide to the SW towards southern TX/northern MX away from 96L over the next few days, to create a little better environment for it, still not the best but definetely better, starting tomorrow into at least Tuesday.


Didnt remember that with all the crazy model runs.
Also once this trough lifts out should settle down as well.
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: Re:

#1144 Postby Portastorm » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:18 am

caneman wrote:
brunota2003 wrote:Wouldn't it be something if the GFS verified?


You have to credit them for at least being the most consistent so far and not really flip flopping.


FWIW, the Canadian (CMC/GGEM) has been just as consistent with its WGOM solution.
0 likes   
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.

caneman

Re: Re:

#1145 Postby caneman » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:20 am

Portastorm wrote:
caneman wrote:
brunota2003 wrote:Wouldn't it be something if the GFS verified?


You have to credit them for at least being the most consistent so far and not really flip flopping.


FWIW, the Canadian (CMC/GGEM) has been just as consistent with its WGOM solution.


They had a pretty big shift overnight from Tx. to La. though. Still too early to tell but looks to be moving at a decent clip now due North.
0 likes   

CYCLONE MIKE
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2183
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: Gonzales, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#1146 Postby CYCLONE MIKE » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:20 am

cycloneye wrote:
Ivanhater wrote:It sure looks pretty far north and east already but well see how the models do today.


The more north it goes then Texas is out of it,or the high blocks it and turns that way?


From the latest I've seen makes a run at the LA coast and gets turned away towards TX.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145383
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Recon

#1147 Postby cycloneye » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:21 am

Todays mission is a go with the plane departing at 12:15 PM EDT.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
robbielyn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1298
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 9:45 am
Location: brooksville, fl

#1148 Postby robbielyn » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:21 am

Finally our baby in the womb has finally appeared. Shes a go now. I am guessing that the broad low has shrunk rather than moved eastward and is consolidating into an llc looks to be moving northward towards ms/al. Its where aric said to look out for it to develop yesterday.

Im not a met.
0 likes   
Robbielyn McCrary
I know just about enough to sound like I know what I'm talking about sometimes. But for your safety please follow the nhc for truly professional forecasting. :D

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

#1149 Postby NDG » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:21 am

This is where I'm thinking the COC is.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: Re:

#1150 Postby HouTXmetro » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:25 am

caneman wrote:
They had a pretty big shift overnight from Tx. to La. though. Still too early to tell but looks to be moving at a decent clip now due North.


I somewhat disagree, as someone said in the discussion page, the broad area of Low Pressure probably shrank and that's where the LLC is taking place. Moving slowly North, but north non the less as was forecast by the models.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

CYCLONE MIKE
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2183
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: Gonzales, LA

Re: Re:

#1151 Postby CYCLONE MIKE » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:26 am

Portastorm wrote:
caneman wrote:
brunota2003 wrote:Wouldn't it be something if the GFS verified?


You have to credit them for at least being the most consistent so far and not really flip flopping.


FWIW, the Canadian (CMC/GGEM) has been just as consistent with its WGOM solution.



Don't forget the euro as well :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: Re:

#1152 Postby HouTXmetro » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:29 am

caneman wrote:
FWIW, the Canadian (CMC/GGEM) has been just as consistent with its WGOM solution.


They had a pretty big shift overnight from Tx. to La. though. Still too early to tell but looks to be moving at a decent clip now due North.[/quote]

LOL, not to pester you cane man... but upper TX coast to Morgan City is not a big shift. give or take it's no more than 125-175 miles. ;-)
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#1153 Postby Air Force Met » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:30 am

caneman wrote:

Doesn't look to be that much shear. Seems to be aiding right now.


As we all talked about yesterday...it should take one more DMAX to get this going and that was it. If a plane was in there now this would be a TS.

But more to your point: You can't look at a satellite picture and say there's not that much shear. That is a classic Gulf sheared system. This is what I was attempting to tell some of the posters yesterday....that shear would be an issue. NOT enough to kill it...or even keep it from developing...but all this talk of surprising everyone by how fast it got to major hurricane status is nonsense.

Again...look at the satellite presentation. All of the convection is on the east. 10-15 kt winds are cutting right through the circulation.

In essence...it is a CLASSIC early Gulf storm. It's a poster child.
0 likes   

CYCLONE MIKE
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2183
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: Gonzales, LA

Re: Re:

#1154 Postby CYCLONE MIKE » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:30 am

HouTXmetro wrote:
caneman wrote:
They had a pretty big shift overnight from Tx. to La. though. Still too early to tell but looks to be moving at a decent clip now due North.


I somewhat disagree, as someone said in the discussion page, the broad area of Low Pressure probably shrank and that's where the LLC is taking place. Moving slowly North, but north non the less as was forecast by the models.


And also being the cmc did shift some around central la coast landfall is not for 4 or 5 days. So it will slow down as the trough lifts out and high builds in.
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#1155 Postby Portastorm » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:31 am

:uarrow:

True that! :lol:

And let me be clear, I'm of the "I have no clue where this is going" camp. The GFS could indeed score a huge coup here if 96L ends up Florida-bound. Can't rule it out whatsoever.
0 likes   
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20010
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#1156 Postby tolakram » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:32 am

Let's not fill the model thread with this back and forth please. You can come to the s2k irc chatroom if you want to chat about it.
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

CYCLONE MIKE
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2183
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: Gonzales, LA

Re: Re:

#1157 Postby CYCLONE MIKE » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:32 am

HouTXmetro wrote:
caneman wrote:
FWIW, the Canadian (CMC/GGEM) has been just as consistent with its WGOM solution.


They had a pretty big shift overnight from Tx. to La. though. Still too early to tell but looks to be moving at a decent clip now due North.


LOL, not to pester you cane man... but upper TX coast to Morgan City is not a big shift. give or take it's no more than 125-175 miles. ;-)[/quote]

That's what I've been trying to say. 4 days out that is not that big of shift

Sorry mark just saw your post :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145383
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#1158 Postby cycloneye » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:34 am

12z Best Track

Watching to see if they renumber it.

AL, 96, 2012062312, , BEST, 0, 254N, 876W, 30, 1002, LO

http://ftp.nhc.noaa.gov/atcf/tcweb/inve ... 012.invest
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
mutley
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 311
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 7:18 am
Location: Gainesville, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#1159 Postby mutley » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:35 am

At this point, it seems the storm is headed northward and head faking both northeast and west, giving forecasters and computers some anxiety. But are air patterns moving fast enough that the northeast/west directional choice will be settled as the day goes by today?
0 likes   
The preceding comments are never to be used as information to establish circumstances, plans or procedures for any weather related events. Only use official National Hurricane Center or National Weather Service information issued for your area.

caneman

Re: Re:

#1160 Postby caneman » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:37 am

CYCLONE MIKE wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:
caneman wrote:
FWIW, the Canadian (CMC/GGEM) has been just as consistent with its WGOM solution.


They had a pretty big shift overnight from Tx. to La. though. Still too early to tell but looks to be moving at a decent clip now due North.


LOL, not to pester you cane man... but upper TX coast to Morgan City is not a big shift. give or take it's no more than 125-175 miles. ;-)


That's what I've been trying to say. 4 days out that is not that big of shift[/quote]

All entitled to our opinion but I would say that the ULL seems to be steering it now and seems to have picked up speed. IMHO. ANd, I'll leave it at that for now.
0 likes   


Return to “2012”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests