CrazyC83 wrote:ozonepete wrote:MiamiensisWx wrote:All these trends just go to show that you really need a major hurricane accelerating from the Bahamas, rather than a late-season nor’easter-type hybrid, and a major hurricane that phases directly (à la 1938, a hybrid that really phased completely due to its location in the jet entrance), to really deliver the full punch of high winds and large surge to the Mid-Atlantic and the Northeast.
Just for you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ash_Wednes ... rm_of_1962
If Irene had this setup, how would it have been different?
It really doesn't matter whether the storm is tropical in origin or not or where it's coming from. It's the amount of time that high water is present while onshore winds are unusually strong and occurring at high tide. Also, it is very important whether the storm is intensifying or weakening. Irene moved fairly quickly and was a cat 1 weakening to a TS as it approached NYC. Thus there was only a few hours of high water before the center passed and winds shifted to offshore. With Sandy there will be 10 feet or so of high water for many many hours before the center approaches and it won't be weakening. As it mocves onto the Jersey coast it will push a storm surge into NY harbor and then winds will shift southeast to south and stay that way until Sandy turns north and passes east of us again. Thus we could have flooding for many many hours.